Injury guide

UPDATED FEB 2026

Part of the Construction Accident investigation
People's Justice Research TeamUpdated February 21, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day

Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.

Construction electrocution is one of the Fatal Four hazards, killing 82 construction workers in 2024 and causing severe, life-altering injuries to hundreds more each year. Electrical injuries in construction occur from contact with overhead power lines, contact with energized conductors on the job site, failure to implement lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures before electrical work, and use of damaged or improperly grounded electrical tools and equipment. OSHA's construction electrical standards, 29 CFR 1926 Subpart K (1926.400 through 1926.449), establish detailed requirements for electrical safety in construction including minimum approach distances to power lines, LOTO procedures, grounding of equipment, and use of ground-fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs). Third-party defendants in construction electrocution cases include the electrical subcontractor, the general contractor who failed to coordinate de-energization, the property owner (for pre-existing electrical hazards on the property), and potentially the utility company for failure to de-energize overhead lines during construction.

Overhead Power Line Proximity — A Leading Cause of Construction Electrocution

OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1408 requires minimum clearance distances of 10 feet from energized overhead power lines up to 50kV for cranes and equipment, with greater distances for higher voltages. Contractors must either arrange for the utility to de-energize and relocate lines, install insulating line guards, or maintain the specified minimum approach distances and post warning lines visible from the work area. Failure to follow these requirements when cranes, boom trucks, or elevated platforms operate near overhead lines is a leading cause of construction electrocution and a clear basis for OSHA citation and civil negligence liability.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Yes — in most cases. Workers' compensation provides an 'exclusive remedy' against your direct employer, which means you generally cannot sue your employer in a civil lawsuit. However, the exclusive remedy doctrine does not protect third parties who are not your direct employer. On a construction site, many parties are present beyond your employer: the general contractor overseeing the project, other subcontractors, the property owner, equipment manufacturers, scaffolding rental companies, and material suppliers. If any of these third parties' negligence contributed to your accident, you can pursue a civil lawsuit against them while simultaneously receiving workers' comp benefits. The workers' comp carrier may assert a lien against your civil lawsuit recovery for benefits paid, but lien resolution negotiations typically allow you to keep the substantial majority of your civil recovery. The dual-track strategy — workers' comp for immediate income replacement plus a civil lawsuit for full damages including pain and suffering — almost always produces a higher total recovery than either track alone.

The full investigation

Part of the Construction Accident Investigation