Injury guide

UPDATED FEB 2026

Part of the Construction Accident investigation
People's Justice Research TeamUpdated February 21, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day

Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.

Struck-by accidents involving falling objects — tools, materials, equipment, and structural components dropped from elevated work areas — are the second leading cause of construction fatalities, killing 175 workers in 2024 and seriously injuring thousands more. OSHA's struck-by protection requirements (29 CFR 1926.502(j)) require that contractors install toe boards, screens, guardrail systems, canopy structures, or barricades to prevent objects from falling onto workers below. Contractors performing overhead work must either contain all materials and tools on the elevated platform or establish exclusion zones below that keep workers clear. Failure to implement these measures — documented by OSHA inspection citations — is a primary basis for third-party negligence claims. In New York, falling object accidents are also covered by Labor Law §240(1), which extends the statute's absolute liability to objects that fall and strike workers below as well as to workers who fall from elevation.

Hard Hat Requirements Are Not Enough

Contractors often defend falling object cases by pointing to the victim's failure to wear a hard hat. Under OSHA 29 CFR 1926.100, hard hats are required in construction areas where there is a danger of head injury — but they are not a substitute for engineering controls that prevent objects from falling in the first place. A hard hat can reduce the severity of injury from a small tool drop but provides no protection against a large beam, pipe section, or pallet of materials dropped from 30 feet. The primary obligation is on the contractor to prevent the falling hazard through engineering controls — toe boards, nets, barricades, and exclusion zones — not to rely on personal protective equipment as the sole defense.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Yes — in most cases. Workers' compensation provides an 'exclusive remedy' against your direct employer, which means you generally cannot sue your employer in a civil lawsuit. However, the exclusive remedy doctrine does not protect third parties who are not your direct employer. On a construction site, many parties are present beyond your employer: the general contractor overseeing the project, other subcontractors, the property owner, equipment manufacturers, scaffolding rental companies, and material suppliers. If any of these third parties' negligence contributed to your accident, you can pursue a civil lawsuit against them while simultaneously receiving workers' comp benefits. The workers' comp carrier may assert a lien against your civil lawsuit recovery for benefits paid, but lien resolution negotiations typically allow you to keep the substantial majority of your civil recovery. The dual-track strategy — workers' comp for immediate income replacement plus a civil lawsuit for full damages including pain and suffering — almost always produces a higher total recovery than either track alone.

The full investigation

Part of the Construction Accident Investigation