Who qualifies

Philips Device Checks: Recall and Claim Are Different

Use the model and serial number to check the recall. A recalled device alone does not prove harm.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202611 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Identify the actual Philips model and your dates of use.
  • Bring the diagnosis and treatment records for an individual legal check.
  • Tell the lawyer about any replacement, earlier registration or agreement.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Grégoire Justeau · Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Angers University Hospital, France · First-listed author of the original CPAP cancer cohort

Finding: The 4,447-person cohort found no increased overall cancer incidence among Philips users compared with other brands. Its observational design and follow-up cannot exclude every risk or decide an individual cause.

Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022 (opens in a new tab) · Jul 14, 2022 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Joy Flowers Conti · United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania · Senior United States District Judge

Finding: The January 16, 2026 opinion grants remand of the Graham case to Kentucky state court. It records past settlements and a January 31, 2025 private injury-settlement registration date; it does not decide personal medical cause or injury compensation.

Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · Jan 16, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort Study Group; Angers University Hospital, France · European Respiratory Journal · 2022

Cancer risk in adherent users of polyurethane foam-containing CPAP devices for sleep apnoea

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
4,447 patients, including 1,648 Philips and 2,799 other-device users
Finding:
No association with increased overall cancer incidence was found over a median 7.2-year follow-up.
Main limitation
Observational design, possible unmeasured factors and limited ability to detect certain cancers. Two authors disclosed Philips lecture honoraria outside the study. This does not establish individual cause or all-model safety.

Read the source: Cancer risk in adherent users of polyurethane foam-containing CPAP devices for sleep apnoea (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Which devices may qualify for a recall check?
Check the model and serial number. The recall does not cover every CPAP machine. [6]
What does not qualify a claim by itself?
A recalled model alone does not show an injury or who is at fault. Recall and legal-program rules answer different questions. [6]
What if my device history is unusual?
List model changes, repairs, replacements and gaps. Ask the supplier and provider how those details affect the check. [6]
What records should I gather?
Keep model, serial, purchase, use and recall records. Ask providers about copies of health and billing records. [6]

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

The criteria attorneys check

  1. 01

    Identify the actual Philips model and your dates of use.

  2. 02

    Bring the diagnosis and treatment records for an individual legal check.

  3. 03

    Tell the lawyer about any replacement, earlier registration or agreement.

Use the model and serial number to check the recall. A recalled device alone does not prove harm. It also does not qualify you for every legal program.

Which devices may qualify for a recall check?

Check the model and serial number. The recall does not cover every CPAP machine.

The June 2021 recall concerned specified ventilators, CPAP and BiPAP devices with PE-PUR sound-reducing foam. FDA directs people to recall information and supplier help when a model is not found. Keep the machine details and notices so the review does not rest on a broad brand name.

What does not qualify a claim by itself?

A recalled model alone does not show an injury or who is at fault. Recall and legal-program rules answer different questions.

FDA describes possible health risks, not disease in every user. A civil case concerns harm and responsibility. A private program also has its own defined terms. A recall list does not by itself prove acceptance, payment or a firm’s agreement to act.

What if my device history is unusual?

List model changes, repairs, replacements and gaps. Ask the supplier and provider how those details affect the check.

FDA discusses recalled and repaired or replaced devices on their own terms. Keep the old and later machine records. The French study’s overall cancer finding does not certify all models. It also cannot decide which device caused a symptom in one person, so your actual history still matters.

What records should I gather?

Keep model, serial, purchase, use and recall records. Ask providers about copies of health and billing records.

Covered health access has stated exceptions; ask who may obtain or receive missing copies. Include records from the equipment supplier and any prior program or claim papers. Mark unknown use dates rather than inventing a fixed duration that would supposedly qualify every person.

Which deadline needs its own check?

Ask a lawyer what law and program dates apply. A recall sign-up date is not everyone’s civil filing limit.

The January 16, 2026 Graham opinion records a January 31, 2025 registration date for a past private injury settlement. It does not set a universal personal filing deadline or decide that every later claim is excluded. Ask what needs prompt action with the actual diagnosis, use, place and prior-claim dates.

What happens after I ask for a check?

Ask who will review the device and the claim facts. Confirm the next action and written legal costs.

Discuss care with the provider before changing device use; stopping can be riskier for some people. Ask the lawyer which work the written fee agreement covers and how expenses are deducted. Nothing in this page’s device check establishes that a supplier, firm or program has accepted your case.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. HHS: Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
  2. Federal courts: civil casesFederal courts: civil cases · court
  3. ABA: fees paid from a successful claimABA: fees paid from a successful claim
  4. SDNY: filing time limitsSDNY: filing time limits · court
  5. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  6. FDA recalled Philips device patient guidanceFDA recalled Philips device patient guidance · regulator
  7. FDA foam testing summaryFDA foam testing summary · regulator
  8. Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022 · study
  9. Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026 · court
  10. Philips announced (Apr 29, 2024) a $1.1 billion total resolution of US Respironics personal-injury and medical-monitoring litigation; the official court settlement site confirms $1.075 billion for personal-injury claims in MDL 3014 and Massachusetts state court (~58,000 registrants; injuries diagnosed by Apr 29, 2024 qualify). A January 16, 2026 court opinion says payments were anticipated in early 2026; no admission of liability.respironicspisettlement.com · Apr 29, 2024
  11. Philips announced resolution of the US economic-loss class litigation in MDL 3014 (Sept 7, 2023 press release): predefined cash awards by device type, extended warranties, and a return bonus; Philips' release cites a EUR 575 million Q1 2023 provision and explicitly excludes personal injury and medical monitoring claims. The commonly cited $479 million settlement figure is from secondary press coverage (Drugwatch), not Philips' own release — flagged accordingly.usa.philips.com · Sep 7, 2023

Checked against 9 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026