In-depth guide

UPDATED FEB 2026

Part of the IVC Filter investigation

The short answer

Retrievable IVC filters were designed to be temporary, but many became permanently embedded — struts penetrating vessel walls or the heart, making standard retrieval impossible. High-risk open or hybrid surgical removal is itself a serious injury and a compensable claim.

Even if your filter was never removed, fractured struts remaining in place support a lawsuit.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated February 23, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day

Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.

The ideal retrieval window for a retrievable IVC filter is generally within 6 months of implantation, before struts begin embedding in the vena cava wall. When retrieval is attempted beyond this window — or when struts have already fractured or penetrated the vessel — the procedure becomes substantially more dangerous. Failed retrieval attempts that leave struts in place, or high-risk open surgical extractions required because standard endovascular approaches failed, constitute independent compensable injuries in IVC filter litigation. Patients who underwent multiple retrieval attempts, or who were told their filter could not be safely removed, may have particularly strong claims.

The full investigation

Part of the IVC Filter Investigation