Case guide

FDA mesh actions: which device and which repair?

FDA stopped sales of mesh for vaginal POP repair in April 2019. Slings and repairs through the abdomen differ.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202614 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Prepare the mesh name, reason for repair and route used.
  • List symptoms, later care and the dates you know.
  • Bring any old claim or deal papers; ask a lawyer about your route.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Publisher of the dated POP mesh review and stop-sale record

Finding: In its October 2022 POP review entry, FDA kept an unfavorable benefit-risk assessment for vaginal prolapse mesh because of added exposure and erosion risks. That assessment is distinct from its sling review and from a diagnosis in any one patient.

FDA: dated POP and sling review activities (opens in a new tab) · Oct 17, 2022 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

United States Food and Drug Administration · 2022

FDA 2021/2022 final reviews of transvaginal prolapse mesh follow-up

Design:
Agency review
Participants:
Agency reviews of separate manufacturer studies; no combined participant total supplied on this page
Finding:
Similar outcomes to own-tissue repair at 36 months, but added exposure/erosion risks led FDA to maintain an unfavorable benefit-risk finding for vaginal POP mesh.
Main limitation
Specific POP devices and 36-month follow-up; not bladder slings or abdominal repair. No individual harm rate; underlying full reports not independently read.

Read the source: FDA 2021/2022 final reviews of transvaginal prolapse mesh follow-up (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What did FDA order in April 2019?
FDA stopped sales of mesh for vaginal POP repair. Two makers had three products left on sale. The action did not cover every surgical mesh. [1]
What happened in the later POP study reviews?
FDA reviewed follow-up after those products left the market. Outcomes at 36 months were similar to tissue-only repair. FDA still found added exposure and erosion concerns. [1]
Did the same action cover urinary slings?
No. FDA reviews slings for urine leaks on their own. Its 2024 review compared mini-slings with longer slings. [5]
Does an FDA warning mean I should have removal?
Ask your clinician about your own findings. FDA advises routine follow-up if you are well and satisfied. New symptoms should be discussed with the care team. [2]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A general finding does not decide the cause of your own harm.
  • These dated records do not decide a personal claim or care plan.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

FDA stopped sales of mesh for vaginal POP repair in April 2019. Slings and repairs through the abdomen differ. The action does not order all implants removed.

What did FDA order in April 2019?

FDA stopped sales of mesh for vaginal POP repair. Two makers had three products left on sale. The action did not cover every surgical mesh.

Pelvic organ prolapse, called POP, means organs drop as their support weakens. The remaining products were Boston Scientific’s Uphold LITE and Xenform and Coloplast’s Restorelle DirectFix Anterior. FDA rejected their approval applications because the submitted evidence did not reasonably assure safety and effectiveness. This scope matters before linking an old operation to the action.

What happened in the later POP study reviews?

FDA reviewed follow-up after those products left the market. Outcomes at 36 months were similar to tissue-only repair. FDA still found added exposure and erosion concerns.

The Boston Scientific review entry is dated August 16, 2021; the Coloplast entry is October 17, 2022. FDA kept its unfavorable benefit-risk view for this use. Similar outcomes at one follow-up period do not erase the agency’s concern or establish any patient’s cause.

Did the same action cover urinary slings?

No. FDA reviews slings for urine leaks on their own. Its 2024 review compared mini-slings with longer slings.

The agency examined manufacturer studies through 36 months and thirty randomized trials with follow-up through five years. It found comparable clinical performance, rather than no risk. Those studies were not a review of vaginal POP mesh or a guarantee for every brand and patient.

Does an FDA warning mean I should have removal?

Ask your clinician about your own findings. FDA advises routine follow-up if you are well and satisfied. New symptoms should be discussed with the care team.

Patient guidance identifies persistent bleeding or discharge, pelvic or groin pain and pain during sex. Tell a provider you have mesh before another procedure. Neither the stop-sale action nor a website can choose a removal plan for you.

Can adverse-event reports prove how often harm occurs?

Reports can flag possible safety problems. They can be incomplete or late. They do not tell how often harm occurs without a count of implants.

FDA describes underreporting, missing denominators and inaccurate or incomplete information as limitations of its passive report system. A reported problem is not a finding that a product caused one person’s harm. Ask for a study’s design and population before applying a risk number to yourself.

Which records help match the warning to my operation?

Check the product and what it treated. Ask whether the route was vaginal or abdominal. Keep a separate note for any urinary sling.

Request the surgery record and available labeling from the provider. If two procedures were done together, identify each one rather than guessing from the word mesh. Ask a lawyer how the correct regulatory record relates to the claimed injury; a warning alone does not decide liability.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. FDA mesh activities: POP stop-sale and later reviewsFDA mesh activities: POP stop-sale and later reviews · regulator
  2. FDA patient information: pelvic organ prolapseFDA patient information: pelvic organ prolapse · regulator
  3. FDA patient information: stress urinary incontinenceFDA patient information: stress urinary incontinence · regulator
  4. FDA guidance: vaginal versus abdominal prolapse meshFDA guidance: vaginal versus abdominal prolapse mesh · regulator
  5. FDA review: mini-slings for stress urinary incontinenceFDA review: mini-slings for stress urinary incontinence · regulator
  6. PROSPECT original four- and six-year randomized follow-upPROSPECT original four- and six-year randomized follow-up · study
  7. Ethicon MDL2327 Pretrial Order337, entered May1,2019Ethicon MDL2327 Pretrial Order337, entered May1,2019 · court
  8. Southern District of West Virginia: Ethicon MDL2327 public archiveSouthern District of West Virginia: Ethicon MDL2327 public archive · court
  9. JPML cumulative terminated litigations through September30,2025JPML cumulative terminated litigations through September30,2025 · court
  10. New Jersey courts: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare dated orders indexNew Jersey courts: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare dated orders index · court
  11. ABA Model Rule1.5: feesABA Model Rule1.5: fees
  12. HHS individual access to health informationHHS individual access to health information · regulator
  13. SDNY: how long to file a complaintSDNY: how long to file a complaint · court
  14. US Courts: civil casesUS Courts: civil cases · court

Checked against 14 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026