Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold
Quick Eligibility Review
Answer one question at a time. This usually takes under 2 minutes.
Check your eligibility — free
Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.
Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day
Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.
The 11-Hour Driving Limit and 14-Hour Window
Under 49 CFR Part 395, property-carrying commercial drivers may not drive more than 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty. More restrictively, no driving is permitted after the 14th consecutive hour following the driver coming on duty after 10 hours off duty — even if the driver has not yet reached the 11-hour driving limit. This 14-hour window cannot be extended by taking breaks within the shift. Once the 14-hour clock starts, it runs continuously regardless of on-duty non-driving time (loading, fueling, inspections).
The 30-minute rest break requirement mandates that drivers take a break of at least 30 minutes before driving beyond 8 cumulative hours from the last off-duty or sleeper-berth period of at least 30 minutes. This rule targets the mid-shift fatigue window when drivers are most likely to experience lapses in alertness. An ELD record that shows continuous driving beyond 8 hours without a 30-minute break is a standalone HOS violation that proves regulatory non-compliance.
Weekly Limits — 60/70-Hour Rule
Beyond daily limits, FMCSA imposes weekly driving limits. Drivers may not drive after putting in 60 hours on duty in any 7 consecutive days (for carriers operating fewer than 7 days per week) or 70 hours on duty in any 8 consecutive days (for carriers operating every day of the week). These limits are designed to prevent cumulative fatigue from building up over days and weeks of extended driving. ELD records covering the full 7- or 8-day period before the accident can reveal weekly HOS violations that the driver and carrier may have attempted to conceal through log manipulation.
Before mandatory ELD requirements, paper logbook falsification was endemic in the industry — drivers maintained duplicate logs showing fictitious rest periods. The FMCSA's ELD mandate eliminated most paper log fraud for drivers required to use ELDs. However, some carriers remain exempt (short-haul operations, vehicles manufactured before 2000, agricultural operations), and paper log falsification still occurs. Corroborating evidence — fuel receipts, toll records, cell phone tower pings, and dispatch messages — can expose log falsification in exempt or non-compliant operations.
34-Hour Restart and Split Sleeper Berth Provisions
The 34-hour restart provision allows drivers to reset their weekly driving clock by taking at least 34 consecutive hours off duty. Carriers under schedule pressure frequently pressure drivers to take restart breaks at convenient times rather than after genuine rest, and then return to maximum driving hours immediately. The split sleeper berth exception allows drivers to split the required 10-hour off-duty period into a 7-hour sleeper berth segment and a 2-hour off-duty segment under specific conditions. Misapplication of these complex provisions to manufacture additional driving time is a documented pattern in HOS violation cases.
Key data
Data & Statistics
HOS violations are present in approximately 13% of truck crashes investigated by FMCSA
FMCSA Large Truck Crash Causation Study
Driving after 17+ hours awake produces impairment comparable to a BAC of 0.05-0.10%
AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
FMCSA ELD mandate (2017) reduced false log entries by an estimated 70% among covered carriers
FMCSA ELD Impact Analysis 2022
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Dive deeper
Related Guides
- Driver Fatigue AccidentsDriver fatigue is the leading cause of serious commercial truck accidents. FMCSA hours-of-service regulations and electronic logging device (ELD) records create a documented paper trail that can prove a fatigued driver violated federal law — establishing negligence per se and dramatically strengthening your claim.
- FMCSA Regulations OverviewThe Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's regulations are the backbone of truck accident litigation. Understanding which FMCSA rules were violated — and how those violations translate into legal negligence — is the foundation of every serious trucking case.
- Multiple Defendants in Trucking CasesUnlike car accidents involving a single at-fault driver, truck accident cases regularly involve multiple defendants: the driver, motor carrier, freight broker, cargo loader, and vehicle manufacturer. Identifying and pursuing all liable parties is essential for maximizing recovery from every available source of compensation.
- Black Box Data and EvidenceModern commercial trucks carry multiple overlapping electronic data systems — event data recorders (EDR), ELD devices, GPS, and dashcams — that can definitively reconstruct a crash. This data must be preserved immediately via spoliation letter, as retention periods are short and carriers may destroy records after 30 days.
- Trucking Company LiabilityTrucking companies bear liability not just for their drivers' actions but for their own corporate failures — negligent hiring, inadequate training, lax supervision, and poor maintenance practices. Proving corporate-level negligence often unlocks punitive damages and significantly increases total recovery.
- Cargo Liability ClaimsImproperly secured cargo that shifts during transport can cause catastrophic loss of vehicle control. FMCSA cargo securement regulations are detailed and violation-specific — load falling from a truck or a shifted center of gravity can transform a routine turn into a fatal rollover. Both the loader and the carrier may be liable.
- Wrongful Death in Truck AccidentsTruck accidents are the leading cause of wrongful death claims in the commercial vehicle context. When a family member is killed by a negligent truck driver or carrier, surviving family members have legal rights to compensation for economic losses, loss of companionship, and in appropriate cases, punitive damages against the carrier.
- Truck Accident Brain InjuriesTraumatic brain injuries from truck accidents are among the highest-value claims in personal injury law. The extreme forces generated by 80,000-pound trucks produce TBIs of greater severity and frequency than standard car crashes, often requiring lifetime care plans costing millions of dollars.
- Truck Accident Spinal InjuriesSpinal cord injuries from truck accidents are among the most devastating and costly personal injury outcomes. Paralysis — whether complete or incomplete — requires lifetime attendant care, specialized equipment, and home modifications that can cost $3-$8 million over a victim's lifetime, producing the highest average truck accident case values.
- Rollover Truck AccidentsCommercial truck rollovers are among the deadliest single-accident events on American highways. High center of gravity, excessive speed on curves, improper load distribution, and driver error combine to cause rollovers that devastate both the truck's occupant and any vehicles in the rollover path.
- Construction Zone Truck AccidentsConstruction zone truck accidents occur in conditions of reduced visibility, narrow lanes, sudden speed reductions, and lateral barriers that eliminate escape room. When trucks violate posted work zone speed limits — which carry doubled fines — or fail to observe construction zone traffic control, liability is clear and penalties are severe.
- Jackknife AccidentsJackknife accidents occur when a semi-truck's trailer swings out at an angle to the cab, creating an uncontrollable situation that can sweep across multiple lanes. These crashes are caused by improper braking, excessive speed, and trailer instability — and are almost always preventable with proper driver training and vehicle maintenance.
- Freeway and Highway Truck AccidentsMajor freight corridors — I-10, I-40, and I-35 — carry the highest concentrations of commercial truck traffic in the nation. Speed differentials between trucks operating near their governed limits and passenger vehicles creates dangerous passing scenarios, and long rural stretches provide no emergency services for serious crashes.
- Rear-End Truck CollisionsRear-end collisions are the most common type of truck crash. A fully loaded 18-wheeler requires up to 525 feet to stop from 65 mph — nearly twice the stopping distance of a passenger car. When a truck driver follows too closely or fails to brake in time, the consequences are often catastrophic for the vehicle in front.
- Toxic HAZMAT Cargo AccidentsHAZMAT truck accidents create multi-layered liability extending far beyond the initial collision — toxic spills, fires, and explosions injure first responders, nearby residents, and downstream contamination victims who may never have been near the accident scene. PHMSA and FMCSA HAZMAT regulations create strict compliance requirements whose violation substantially enhances carrier liability.
- Food Delivery Truck AccidentsLast-mile food and beverage delivery trucks — operating on tight schedules in dense urban and suburban environments — present a distinct accident profile from interstate freight. These claims may involve smaller carriers with lower insurance and independent contractor drivers whose employment status creates specific liability questions.
- Truck Accident InvestigationA successful truck accident claim begins with a rapid, comprehensive investigation. Spoliation letters, black box downloads, scene documentation, and witness interviews must happen within days — not weeks — of the crash. The investigation advantage is one of the primary reasons early attorney involvement is critical in commercial vehicle cases.
- Uber Freight and Amazon Logistics TrucksGig-economy freight platforms — Uber Freight, Amazon Delivery Service Partners, Convoy, and similar technology-brokered logistics companies — have created new and contested liability structures in trucking. Victims of accidents involving gig-economy trucks face complex questions of whether the platform, the DSP, or the independent owner-operator bears primary liability.
- Underride AccidentsUnderride accidents — where a smaller vehicle slides under a truck's trailer — are among the deadliest crash types, frequently fatal or catastrophic. Rear underride guards are required by FMCSA regulations, but many are inadequate; side underride remains largely unregulated despite advocacy from safety organizations.
- Blind Spot AccidentsCommercial trucks have four large blind spots — No-Zones — where drivers cannot see surrounding vehicles. FMCSA mirror requirements exist to minimize blind spots, but lane changes without adequate lookout remain a leading cause of truck-involved collisions. Understanding No-Zones is critical for establishing driver and carrier negligence.
- Tire Blowout AccidentsCommercial truck tire blowouts can cause catastrophic loss of vehicle control, sending debris across multiple lanes and creating sudden steering failures. FMCSA tire inspection requirements exist to prevent blowouts, and carriers who fail to maintain or inspect tires face significant negligence exposure.
- Brake Failure AccidentsCommercial truck brake failures are among the most preventable — and most deadly — trucking accidents. FMCSA inspection requirements specifically target brake systems, and brake defects are the most common reason commercial vehicles are placed out of service. Carriers that fail to maintain air brake systems face substantial negligence exposure.
- Commercial Truck InsuranceFederal law requires commercial trucks to carry substantially higher liability insurance than personal vehicles — $750,000 to $5 million depending on cargo type. Understanding these requirements and how commercial insurance policies are layered is essential for maximizing recovery in serious truck accident cases.
- CDL Violations and LiabilityCDL requirements, endorsements, and disqualification rules are federal standards that, when violated, create powerful evidence of negligence. A carrier that employs a driver with a disqualified CDL or without required endorsements for the cargo type being transported faces direct liability for negligent hiring and entrustment.
The full investigation