Case guide

Family losses: what does a claim cover?

Loss of support or companionship may need a different legal check from grief or a surviving injury claim. Ask which claim and people are covered.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202612 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Preparation questions only; family relationship does not establish every state’s right to sue.
  • Identify the death, alleged event, family relationships and any estate representative.
  • Ask which claim, governing law, records and filing requirements apply.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Justice Richardson · Supreme Court of California · Author of the majority opinion identified in the original record

Finding: The historical majority distinguished society and companionship losses from grief in the California death action and reversed that verdict for misleading instructions. It did not set an award for this reader or decide every state’s losses.

Krouse v. Graham: original California majority opinion (opens in a new tab) · Mar 14, 1977 · Checked Oct 4, 2026

The short answer

What does loss of consortium mean in this context?
Consortium means aspects of a close bond, such as support and care. The legal claim matters. Do not assume every loss has the same rule. [12]
Is loss of companionship the same as grief for a claim?
The two may be treated differently by law. Ask which loss the claim covers. Do not use one label to decide all emotional harm. [12]
Who may bring a relationship-loss claim after death?
Have the claimant and relationship rules checked. A close bond alone does not settle filing authority. Family and estate roles may differ. [5]
Is the person’s own surviving claim a separate loss?
Ask whose claim and loss are involved. Keep the estate and family issues distinct. A death does not combine all damages. [6]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • The historical California opinion is not every state’s current rule.
  • A relationship label does not prove the claimant role or set a fixed award.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Loss of support or companionship may need a different legal check from grief or a surviving injury claim. Ask which claim and people are covered. No set value is supplied for a relationship loss.

What does loss of consortium mean in this context?

Consortium means aspects of a close bond, such as support and care. The legal claim matters. Do not assume every loss has the same rule.

In Krouse’s1977 California majority, Justice Richardson discussed society, comfort and related losses in a death action and compared them with consortium in a personal injury claim. Those are claim-specific distinctions, not a national promise of recovery for every relative or all grief. Later controlling law still needs checking.

Is loss of companionship the same as grief for a claim?

The two may be treated differently by law. Ask which loss the claim covers. Do not use one label to decide all emotional harm.

The historical Krouse majority separated companionship-type losses from grief in the death action before it. The court reversed that verdict because the instructions were confusing; it did not announce a new payment. Separate personal injury and distress claims were also present. Its death-action discussion does not decide every possible emotional-harm claim.

Who may bring a relationship-loss claim after death?

Have the claimant and relationship rules checked. A close bond alone does not settle filing authority. Family and estate roles may differ.

California377.60 lists specified death-action claimant categories, while Texas71.004 uses its own beneficiaries and representative roles. The laws do not prove every unmarried partner, sibling or other relative has the same claim in all states. Bring the actual relationship and appointment papers. Do not assume a family label resolves who can act.

Is the person’s own surviving claim a separate loss?

Ask whose claim and loss are involved. Keep the estate and family issues distinct. A death does not combine all damages.

California’s survival article addresses the deceased person’s cause of action, including representative roles and specific damage restrictions and exceptions. Those rules are not a national definition of the family’s relationship loss. Ask counsel whether a proposed claim concerns the survivor’s loss or the deceased person’s own earlier injury.

What evidence helps explain the relationship and its loss?

Keep records of support and the relationship you can substantiate. Ask what the claim needs. Check legal dates before waiting for a complete file.

Organize the available household, care or support history without inventing a financial value or frequency of assistance. The historical opinion addresses loss categories, not a formula for your case. The court’s general guide ties deadlines to the actual claim and law; it does not promise extra time to gather relationship evidence.

What happens when I check a relationship-loss claim?

Ask which losses and people the lawyer will assess. Ask what proof remains missing. Read the fee and expense terms.

Bring prior claim papers, representation terms and any estate appointment. Ask how this proposed loss relates to the other claims and interests. The ABA model fee rule supports written contingent-fee and expense terms. No standard relationship-loss value, automatic spouse award or firm acceptance is stated here.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code chapter71Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code chapter71 · regulator
  5. California CCP377.60: persons who may assert death claimCalifornia CCP377.60: persons who may assert death claim · regulator
  6. California CCP377.30–.35: deceased person’s own actionCalifornia CCP377.30–.35: deceased person’s own action · regulator
  7. New York EPTL5-4.1: representative and time rulesNew York EPTL5-4.1: representative and time rules · regulator
  8. BLS: fatal occupational injury census2024, released2026BLS: fatal occupational injury census2024, released2026 · regulator
  9. 45 CFR164.502(g): deceased individual representative45 CFR164.502(g): deceased individual representative · regulator
  10. EPA Records $12.5 Million Penalty Against Lowe's Home Centersecho.epa.gov · Aug 6, 2026 · regulator
  11. CPSC Recalls Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails Over Entrapment, Asphyxiation Riskcpsc.gov · Sep 3, 2026 · regulator
  12. Krouse v. Graham: original California majority opinion

Checked against 12 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026