Litigation glossary

Daubert Standard

The federal test for whether expert scientific testimony is reliable enough for a jury to hear. Mass torts live and die on Daubert rulings — a lost motion can erase an entire litigation.

Under Daubert v. Merrell Dow and Federal Rule of Evidence 702, judges gatekeep expert testimony for reliability: testable methods, peer review, error rates, general acceptance. In mass torts, general-causation experts — the scientists linking product to disease — are the whole ballgame.

The cautionary tale is Zantac: in 2022 the MDL judge excluded plaintiffs' causation experts, effectively ending roughly 50,000 federal claims overnight. Firms that had borrowed against those inventories absorbed the loss — a reminder that scientific posture is claim value.

Sources & attribution

Sources cited