Comparison

MDL vs. Class Action: What's the Difference in Mass Tort Cases?

People's Justice Research Team

MDL vs. Class Action

People often use “class action” as a catch-all for any large lawsuit, but most mass-tort cases involving dangerous drugs or defective medical devices are actually multidistrict litigation (MDL), not class actions. The difference affects how your case is handled and how any compensation is decided.

In an MDL, many individual lawsuits that share common questions are transferred to a single federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. Each plaintiff keeps their own separate case, so any recovery generally reflects that person's specific injuries. In a class action, one or a few representatives sue on behalf of an entire “class” of people, and the outcome typically binds everyone who does not opt out.

This page is general information, not legal advice, and People's Justice is not a law firm. Which structure applies to a given situation depends on the specific facts and the court's decisions — an attorney can explain what applies to you during a free, confidential case review.

The dataset

The Data

5 ROWS
FeatureMDL (Multidistrict Litigation)Class Action
Your lawsuit
Stays your own individual case
One case represents the whole class
How compensation is decided
Based on your own injuries and facts
Often allocated by a court-approved formula
Control over your case
You generally retain more say
The class representatives and court lead
Common in drug/device mass torts?
Yes — the usual structure
Less common for physical-injury torts
Opting out
Not applicable (already individual)
Usually possible, to pursue your own suit

MDL vs. Class Action: What's the Difference in Mass Tort Cases?

Free case review

Wondering whether what happened to you is a case?

Answer a few plain-language questions — free, confidential, and about 2 minutes. If you qualify, a case specialist explains your options. Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.

Check your eligibility — free →