Arizona · Claims for harm linked to Dupixent
Claims for harm linked to Dupixent in Arizona
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
| Filing deadline | 2 years from discovery of injuryAriz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542 |
|---|
Deadlines vary with the facts of each case. A lawyer can confirm yours.
Updated
01 · Your filing deadline
What is the deadline in Arizona?
Arizona: 2 years for product liability (Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542). Discovery rule applies — limitations begin when the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered the injury and its causal connection to the product. A lawyer can confirm yours.
Source: Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542
Deadlines vary; a lawyer can confirm yours. An older diagnosis or a past filing window does not, by itself, establish whether you have a claim.

02 · Where cases are heard
Where would my case be heard?
Arizona's rapidly growing population and large elderly demographic drive substantial Dupixent prescribing volume, particularly in the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas where major dermatology and allergy practices serve the state's 7.4 million residents. The Mayo Clinic Arizona campus in Scottsdale provides world-class cutaneous lymphoma diagnostic evaluation, and Banner Health's extensive network covers much of the state's dermatological care. Arizona's product liability framework is plaintiff-friendly: the state follows strict liability under the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A, applies pure comparative fault (meaning plaintiff recovery is reduced but never barred by comparative negligence), and imposes no statutory caps on compensatory or punitive damages. The District of Arizona in Phoenix has managed complex pharmaceutical litigation efficiently, and Arizona's growing population of transplants from other states creates a diverse jury pool with limited ties to pharmaceutical industry defendants.
Arizona has one federal judicial district — the District of Arizona — with courthouses in Phoenix and Tucson. The Phoenix division handles the majority of pharmaceutical litigation. Arizona follows a pure comparative fault system with no damage caps in product liability cases. The state's strict liability framework under Restatement (Second) § 402A applies to pharmaceutical manufacturers, and Arizona courts have been receptive to failure-to-warn claims against drug companies.
How this works nationally
For the overall process and updates, read the Claims for harm linked to Dupixent overview. This page covers the local information available for Arizona.
What happens when I check?
You answer a few short questions about what happened. If you send them, your answers are kept on file. If a participating law firm takes these cases, it may contact you. People's Justice is not a law firm.
Live in Arizona? Read what applies in your state.
Register your interest. If a participating law firm takes these cases, it may contact you.
Register your interestSources
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542