State litigation guide · Florida

Slip and Fall Lawsuit in Florida

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated July 20, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Filing venue

Where to File in Florida

Florida's premises liability framework was substantially modified by § 768.0755, Florida Statutes (2010), which reinstated a negligence standard for transitory foreign substances in business establishments. To prevail in a slip-and-fall claim involving a transitory foreign substance such as a spilled liquid, a plaintiff must prove the business establishment had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action. Constructive knowledge may be inferred when the condition existed for a sufficient length of time that the business should have known of it through the exercise of ordinary care, or when the condition occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable. The traditional invitee/licensee/trespasser distinctions still govern non-transitory-substance premises cases.

Florida provides a four-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims under § 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes—one of the longest in the nation. However, claims against Florida governmental entities require compliance with the Florida Tort Claims Act, § 768.28, Florida Statutes. A claimant must present a written notice of claim to the appropriate agency and the Florida Department of Financial Services within three years of the incident, and must wait 180 days before filing suit unless the claim is denied earlier. Failure to provide timely pre-suit notice is a jurisdictional bar to suit against government entities.

Florida historically applied pure comparative fault under § 768.81, Florida Statutes. However, in March 2023 Florida amended § 768.81 to a modified comparative fault system: plaintiffs found more than 50% at fault are now barred from recovery. This change applies to causes of action accruing on or after March 24, 2023. Cases arising from incidents before that date continue under the prior pure comparative fault standard, under which damages were reduced proportionally regardless of the plaintiff's share of fault.

Florida's humid subtropical climate means wet floors from rain, condensation, and tropical storms are common hazard sources in commercial premises. Florida courts have addressed the natural tracking exception, where rain or wet conditions outside do not automatically create liability when customers track water in, provided the business has adequate warning signs and matting protocols. Landlords of multi-family residential buildings owe statutory duties under Florida's Landlord-Tenant Act to maintain common areas in a reasonably safe condition, creating a basis for premises liability claims in apartment complex slip-and-fall incidents.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Possibly — whether partial fault bars or reduces your recovery depends entirely on your state's negligence law. There are three main frameworks. In pure comparative negligence states (California, New York, and others), you can recover even if you were 99% at fault — your compensation is simply reduced by your percentage of fault. In modified comparative negligence states (most states), you can recover only if you were less than 50% or 51% at fault, depending on the state's specific threshold. In pure contributory negligence states (Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, and Washington D.C.), any fault on your part — even 1% — completely bars your recovery. Property owners and their insurers routinely try to assign blame to the victim, claiming you were distracted by your phone, wearing inappropriate footwear, or ignoring obvious hazards. An attorney can help counter these arguments with evidence about the hazard's condition, the adequacy of any warnings, and the reasonableness of your conduct.

Keep reading