State litigation guide · Kansas

Hernia Mesh (Davol/C.R. Bard) Lawsuit in Kansas

Time limits apply in Kansas. Find out if you still qualify.

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated June 11, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Statute of limitations — Kansas

K.S.A. § 60-513(a)(4) sets a 2-year limitations period for personal injury claims. The discovery rule under § 60-513(b) delays accrual until the injury is reasonably ascertainable, which in hernia mesh cases runs from when complications manifested and were linked to the mesh device. Kansas maintains a 10-year statute of repose running from the product's sale — claimants implanted more than 10 years ago should seek legal counsel immediately. Most Kansas cases transfer to MDL 2846 in S.D. Ohio.

2 years from when mesh complications were reasonably ascertainable (10-year repose from product sale)

Kansas data

Exposure in Kansas

Estimated annual hernia repair surgeries in Kansas, with the University of Kansas Health System and Stormont Vail Health among the highest-volume providers

~8,600

Source: Kansas Hospital Association surgical utilization report

Kansas product liability statute of repose requires claimants implanted with mesh more than 10 years ago to consult an attorney immediately about tolling arguments

10-year repose

Source: K.S.A. § 60-513(b) and Kansas appellate case law

Medical resources

Clinics & Specialists in Kansas

University of Kansas Health System — Division of General Surgery

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Hernia mesh litigation is a mass tort action against manufacturers of defective synthetic mesh implants used in hernia repair surgery. The primary defendants are Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard (now part of Becton Dickinson), Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson), Atrium Medical, and Covidien (now part of Medtronic). These companies manufactured polypropylene and composite mesh devices that have been associated with serious complications including mesh migration, adhesion, infection, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction. Thousands of patients have filed claims in MDL 2846 in the Southern District of Ohio and in state court coordinations.

Keep reading