Rideshare Sexual Assault (Uber/Lyft) Lawsuit in Michigan

Time limits apply in Michigan. Find out if you still qualify.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated July 13, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Statute of limitations — Michigan

Michigan civil SOL for sexual assault (criminal sexual conduct): 10 years from date of assault (MCL 600.5838b). Minority tolling applies. Michigan enacted this extended period in 2018, recognizing the delayed disclosure reality for survivors.

10 years from date of assault (minority tolling applies)

Filing venue

Where to File in Michigan

Federal Consolidation — Uber MDL 3084 (N.D. Cal.): Michigan Uber plaintiffs are part of MDL No. 3084 before Judge Charles R. Breyer in San Francisco. Detroit, Grand Rapids, and Ann Arbor are primary Michigan rideshare markets contributing plaintiff volume to the MDL. Notably, Uber's early operations included significant Michigan market presence, and the MDL allows Michigan plaintiffs to access Uber's company-wide safety records and executive communications.

Lyft — California JCCP 5029: Michigan Lyft claims are coordinated in JCCP No. 5029 before Judge Ethan Schulman in San Francisco Superior Court. Michigan plaintiffs may also file in Wayne County Circuit Court (Detroit) or other Michigan venues. The JCCP provides access to Lyft's national driver screening records and safety incident database, which is directly relevant to Michigan plaintiffs' negligent hiring claims.

Michigan Statute of Limitations: Michigan Compiled Laws § 600.5805 sets a three-year general personal injury SOL. For sexual assault, Michigan's 2018 amendments (MCL § 600.5805(13)) provide a 10-year SOL for civil claims arising from criminal sexual conduct (CSC). For childhood sexual abuse, MCL § 600.5851b eliminates the SOL entirely for CSC occurring when the survivor was a minor. Adult rideshare sexual assault survivors benefit from the 10-year CSC SOL, which runs from the date of the assault.

Michigan Rideshare Regulations and Mandatory Reporting: Michigan Public Act 345 of 2016 (TNC Act) requires national criminal background checks and sex offender registry searches for TNC drivers. Drivers with any felony conviction within the past seven years, or any criminal sexual conduct conviction, are permanently disqualified. Michigan's mandatory reporting law (MCL § 722.623) requires certain professionals to report child abuse; adult sexual assault is reported under MCL § 750.520c and the Michigan State Police crime reporting system. The Michigan Public Service Commission oversees TNC insurance and compliance requirements.

Michigan data

Exposure in Michigan

Michigan civil SOL for sexual assault claims — enacted 2018

10 years

Source: MCL 600.5838b

Primary Michigan rideshare market — significant airport (DTW) rideshare volume

Detroit

Source: Platform data

Medical resources

Clinics & Specialists in Michigan

Detroit Receiving Hospital — SANE Program (DMC)

HAVEN — Oakland County Rape Crisis

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

No. A police report is not required to pursue a civil lawsuit against Uber or Lyft. Civil claims and criminal prosecutions are entirely separate legal proceedings. You can file a civil claim regardless of whether you reported the assault to law enforcement, regardless of whether the police investigated, and regardless of whether criminal charges were filed or resulted in a conviction. Many survivors have compelling civil cases despite never having reported to police — and that decision is entirely yours to make. A civil attorney can pursue your case based on the evidence that exists, which may include trip records, GPS data, witness accounts, medical records, and the driver's background check history.

Civil cases are proven by a preponderance of the evidence — meaning it is more likely than not that the assault occurred as you described. This is a significantly lower standard than the criminal burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidence in rideshare assault civil cases can include your own testimony, SANE exam findings, medical records documenting injuries or PTSD, trip GPS data confirming you were in the vehicle with the driver, the driver's complaint history on the platform, text messages or in-app communications made after the assault, and expert testimony from forensic psychologists regarding trauma symptoms consistent with your account. Your attorney works with all of this evidence to build the strongest possible case.

Uber and Lyft maintain extensive records for every completed trip. Through litigation discovery, your attorney can compel production of: GPS route data showing the exact path and any deviations from the intended route; time-stamped records of when the trip started and ended; the driver's account history including all prior trips, ratings, and complaints; any in-app reports made by you or other passengers against this driver; background check documentation for the driver; and internal communications about how the company responded to reports of assault by this driver. These records are often critical evidence in rideshare assault cases and can be obtained only through formal legal discovery — which is why preserving your legal claim promptly matters.

Yes, under multiple legal theories. Negligent hiring claims allege that Uber or Lyft's background check process was inadequate and allowed a dangerous driver onto the platform. Negligent retention claims allege that the platform received complaints or warning signs about this driver and failed to remove them. Negligent supervision claims target the platform's failure to monitor driver conduct. Common carrier liability — which holds transportation companies to a heightened duty of care for passenger safety — may apply in some jurisdictions. These are claims against the corporate entities themselves, separate from and in addition to any claim against the individual driver.

MDL stands for multi-district litigation — a federal procedural mechanism that consolidates thousands of related lawsuits before a single judge for pre-trial proceedings including discovery. The Uber sexual assault MDL (MDL No. 3084) is pending in the Northern District of California. Joining the MDL does not mean you lose your individual claim — it means your case benefits from shared discovery including Uber's internal safety data, driver records, and corporate policies, which would be prohibitively expensive to obtain individually. Your attorney will advise whether the MDL is the right venue for your case or whether state court provides strategic advantages for your specific circumstances.

Settlement values in rideshare sexual assault cases typically range from $300,000 to over $5 million depending on the nature and severity of the assault, the extent of documented physical and psychiatric injuries, the strength of evidence establishing the platform's negligence, and the jurisdiction. Cases involving rape or penetration, documented PTSD requiring long-term treatment, significant loss of employment, or particularly egregious corporate negligence command the highest values. Punitive damages may be available where Uber or Lyft's conduct was especially reckless.

The statute of limitations for civil sexual assault claims varies widely by state and has changed significantly in recent years. Many states now provide 5 to 20 years from the date of assault, and some states have no civil time limit at all. California provides 10 years; New York provides 20 years; Texas provides 5 years; Florida provides 7 years. Survivors who were minors at the time of the assault typically have additional time due to tolling rules that suspend the deadline until age 18. Discovery rule tolling may extend deadlines further in some circumstances. Do not assume time has passed without speaking with an attorney — the only definitive answer comes from evaluating the specific laws that apply to your state and situation.

Uber and Lyft have attempted to use arbitration clauses in their terms of service to force sexual assault claims out of court and into private arbitration. However, in response to sustained legal advocacy, Congress passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFASASHA) in 2022, which prohibits enforcement of pre-dispute arbitration agreements in cases involving sexual assault or sexual harassment. This federal law means Uber and Lyft cannot force you into arbitration — you have the right to pursue your claims in federal or state court, including in the MDL. The terms of service you agreed to when creating your account cannot waive your right to a day in court for a sexual assault claim.

Protecting your privacy is a priority. In many jurisdictions, courts allow sexual assault plaintiffs to proceed under a pseudonym (such as Jane Doe) rather than their legal name in public court filings. Both the Uber and Lyft MDLs have addressed pseudonymous filing procedures. Settlement agreements can include confidentiality provisions. Your attorney will advise you on the specific privacy protections available in your jurisdiction and in the MDL, and will advocate for maximum privacy protection on your behalf. Within your attorney's office, all communications are protected by attorney-client privilege.

Most rideshare sexual assault civil cases settle before trial, which means the majority of survivors never testify in open court. Even in cases that proceed toward trial, there are procedures to protect survivors including deposition testimony taken in private settings rather than open court, the use of video deposition rather than live testimony, and the exclusion of the defendant driver from depositions of the survivor where legally permitted. If your case does go to trial, your attorney will prepare you thoroughly and advocate for all available protections. You will never be required to confront your attacker alone or without legal support.

Yes, in many circumstances. Courts in jurisdictions including the Northern District of California (where the Uber MDL is pending) have granted permission for sexual assault plaintiffs to file under pseudonyms such as Jane Doe. Your attorney will file a motion for leave to proceed anonymously and will present the legal arguments — including the deeply personal nature of the allegations, the risk of reputational harm, and the public interest in encouraging survivors to come forward — that courts regularly find compelling in sexual assault cases. Even if full anonymity is not granted, courts frequently enter protective orders limiting public access to identifying information in the record.

An evidence preservation demand is sent to Uber or Lyft immediately. Your attorney files the complaint (which may be under a pseudonym) and the case enters discovery, where Uber or Lyft must produce internal records. Your attorney may take depositions of company employees responsible for driver screening and safety. Settlement negotiations typically occur throughout this process. Most cases resolve in 12-36 months. If settlement is not reached, a trial is scheduled. At every stage, you control the major decisions — whether to settle, what amount to accept, and whether to testify.

Keep reading

← Back to Rideshare Sexual Assault (Uber/Lyft) Lawsuit Overview Track the Rideshare Sexual Assault (Uber/Lyft) litigation timeline →

Where to File in Michigan

Exposure in Michigan

Clinics & Specialists in Michigan

Detroit Receiving Hospital — SANE Program (DMC)

HAVEN — Oakland County Rape Crisis

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to report the assault to police before I can sue Uber or Lyft?

How do I prove the driver assaulted me?

What evidence does Uber or Lyft have about my trip?

Is Uber or Lyft legally responsible for my driver's assault?

What is the MDL and should I join it?

How much is my rideshare sexual assault case worth?

How long do I have to file a rideshare sexual assault claim?

What if I agreed to Uber's or Lyft's terms of service? Can they use that against me?

Will my name and identity be kept confidential?

Will I have to testify or confront my attacker?

Can I file a claim and remain anonymous?

What does the legal process look like from beginning to end?