Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit in Texas

Free Case Review

Start Your Free Review

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

Written By
People's Justice Legal Research Team

Statute of Limitations

Texas has a 2-year statute of limitations for personal injury and products liability claims (CPRC § 16.003). The discovery rule applies to latent product defects — the clock starts when the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and its probable cause. Texas has a 15-year statute of repose for product liability claims (CPRC § 16.012). PowerPort cases are filed in the Southern District of Texas (Houston Division) or Western District and transferred to the MDL in Arizona.

2 years from discovery of injury (discovery rule applies; 15-year repose)

Filing Venue

Where to File in Texas

MDL 3081 (In re: Bard PowerPort) is centralized in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona under Chief Judge David G. Campbell. Texas plaintiffs with cases filed in the Northern (Dallas/Fort Worth), Southern (Houston), Western (Austin/San Antonio), or Eastern (Tyler) Districts of Texas are transferred to Phoenix for coordinated pretrial proceedings. Texas ranks among the top three states for total MDL filings given its large cancer survivor population.

Texas applies a 2-year statute of limitations for personal injury and product liability claims under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003. The discovery rule tolls the limitations period in latent-injury device cases; the clock begins when the plaintiff first knew or should have known of the injury caused by the PowerPort catheter fracture. Texas courts have applied the discovery rule favorably in medical device litigation involving asymptomatic catheter degradation.

Texas hosts two NCI-Designated Cancer Centers — MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston) and Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (Dallas) — as well as an expansive network of community oncology practices affiliated with Baylor Scott & White, HCA Healthcare, and Texas Oncology. MD Anderson’s chemotherapy volume makes it one of the highest-volume PowerPort implantation sites nationally, and its patient population is well-represented in MDL 3081 filings.

Primary federal venues for Texas PowerPort plaintiffs are the S.D. Tex. (Houston) and N.D. Tex. (Dallas), both active conduits to MDL 3081. Becton, Dickinson and Company maintains significant Texas operations including medical-device sales territory management from its Dallas-area offices. BD’s Bard Medical subsidiary has longstanding supply relationships with major Texas health systems, supporting general and specific personal jurisdiction claims in Texas state and federal courts.

Texas Data

Exposure in Texas

Source: U.S. News Best Hospitals, 2024

Source: Reported settlement data

Source: Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 16.003

Medical Resources

Clinics & Specialists in Texas

MD Anderson Cancer Center

UT Southwestern Medical Center — Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center

Back to Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit Overview