State litigation guide · Texas

Slip and Fall Lawsuit in Texas

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated July 20, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Filing venue

Where to File in Texas

Texas premises liability law expressly recognizes the traditional trichotomy of entrant status. A property owner owes a business invitee the duty to exercise reasonable care to inspect the premises, discover dangerous conditions, and warn of or remedy them. A licensee (social guest or person entering with permission for their own purpose) is owed a duty to warn only of known dangers that the licensee would not reasonably discover. A trespasser is owed only a duty to refrain from willful, wanton, or grossly negligent conduct, except that child trespassers may recover under the attractive nuisance doctrine if conditions are met under Restatement § 339 as adopted by Texas courts.

Texas imposes a two-year statute of limitations on personal injury claims under Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003. Claims against a Texas governmental entity require compliance with the Texas Tort Claims Act (TTCA), Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 101.001 et seq. Formal notice must be provided to the governmental unit within six months of the incident as a condition precedent to suit; larger municipalities such as Houston and Dallas may have shorter charter-based notice requirements. The TTCA waives sovereign immunity in limited circumstances, including premises defects on property the governmental unit owns or controls.

Texas applies a modified comparative fault system under Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 33.001, using the 51% bar rule. A plaintiff who is more than 50% responsible for their own injury is barred from any recovery. Plaintiffs found 50% or less at fault may recover damages reduced by their proportionate share of responsibility. Fault is allocated among all responsible parties, including settling parties and designated responsible third parties who need not be formal defendants. This framework makes pre-trial designation of responsible third parties a significant tactical consideration for defense counsel.

Texas courts apply a no-duty rule for natural accumulations of ice and snow: a property owner generally has no duty to remove naturally accumulated ice or snow unless they undertook negligent remediation that created a more dangerous condition. However, owners can be held liable for artificial accumulations of ice from drainage defects, leaking roofs, or improperly designed downspouts. Constructive notice of a wet or slippery condition on a commercial premises is typically established through evidence of the condition's duration, such as the time-notice rule requiring plaintiffs to show how long the hazard existed before the fall.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Possibly — whether partial fault bars or reduces your recovery depends entirely on your state's negligence law. There are three main frameworks. In pure comparative negligence states (California, New York, and others), you can recover even if you were 99% at fault — your compensation is simply reduced by your percentage of fault. In modified comparative negligence states (most states), you can recover only if you were less than 50% or 51% at fault, depending on the state's specific threshold. In pure contributory negligence states (Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, and Washington D.C.), any fault on your part — even 1% — completely bars your recovery. Property owners and their insurers routinely try to assign blame to the victim, claiming you were distracted by your phone, wearing inappropriate footwear, or ignoring obvious hazards. An attorney can help counter these arguments with evidence about the hazard's condition, the adequacy of any warnings, and the reasonableness of your conduct.

Keep reading