The Bard PowerPort is an implantable venous access device — a small port placed under the skin, typically in the chest — that allows medical professionals to administer chemotherapy, draw blood, and deliver medications without repeated needle sticks. Millions of patients have received PowerPort devices since C.R. Bard introduced them in the 1990s. The devices are especially common among cancer patients who require long-term intravenous access. Beginning in the early 2010s, patients, physicians, and researchers began documenting a disturbing pattern: the polyurethane catheter tubing attached to the port was fracturing inside the body. Fragments of the catheter — sometimes several centimeters long — were entering the bloodstream and migrating toward the heart and lungs. The resulting complications range from serious to fatal: cardiac perforation, cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, and endocarditis. Becton Dickinson (BD) acquired C.R. Bard in 2017 for $24 billion, inheriting both the PowerPort product line and the mounting litigation. In 2022, a federal multidistrict litigation was established in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona to consolidate cases nationwide. Legal claims proceed under theories of design defect, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, and negligence. Patients who received a PowerPort catheter and subsequently experienced catheter fracture, fragment migration, infection, cardiac complications, or unexplained symptoms may be entitled to substantial compensation.
Litigation Timeline
Surgical Retrieval and Lawsuit Filed
Interventional radiologists or cardiothoracic surgeons perform fragment retrieval via cardiac catheterization or open surgery. Following recovery, patients and families are increasingly aware of the PowerPort MDL and consult personal injury attorneys specializing in medical device litigation. Attorneys obtain implant records, operative reports, imaging studies, pathology specimens, and device serial number information to verify the PowerPort model and lot. Cases are filed in federal district court and transferred to MDL 3:22-md-03062 in the District of Arizona. The case enters the MDL pretrial process, including the plaintiff fact sheet process, general causation expert disclosure, and the bellwether trial selection process.
legalImaging Reveals Fractured Catheter with Migrated Fragments
Chest X-ray obtained for another purpose, or targeted imaging when catheter malfunction is suspected, reveals a radiodense fragment at an unexpected location — the right heart, pulmonary artery, or peripheral pulmonary vasculature. A CT of the chest or fluoroscopic evaluation confirms the fragment's position and determines whether percutaneous retrieval is feasible. At this point the treating physician contacts interventional radiology or cardiac surgery. This imaging date is critical for legal purposes: it is typically when the discovery rule clock begins to run on the statute of limitations, and it marks the start of the patient's informed awareness that a product defect may have caused their injuries.
legalPatient Presents with Symptoms — Chest Pain, Shortness of Breath, or Infection
Many patients first present with symptoms that are not immediately linked to the PowerPort. Chest pain, shortness of breath, recurrent fevers, and unexplained bloodstream infections may be attributed to the patient's underlying cancer, post-treatment effects, or unrelated cardiac or pulmonary conditions. This attribution delay is one of the most medically and legally significant aspects of PowerPort cases — it extends the period before the catheter defect is identified and it can delay the start of the statute of limitations under the discovery rule. Some patients are told their recurrent infections have "no identifiable source" until catheter fracture is eventually identified.
medicalCatheter Silently Fractures Over Time
With no pain, no warning, and no external sign, the polyurethane catheter tubing develops microscopic cracks from environmental stress cracking at anatomical pinch points — typically where the catheter passes beneath the clavicle or is anchored at the port body. Over weeks to months, cyclical mechanical stress and lipid absorption cause the crack to propagate through the full thickness of the catheter wall. A segment of tubing fractures completely and detaches. The fragment enters the venous circulation and is swept by blood flow toward the heart. The patient goes about daily life entirely unaware that a foreign body is now traveling through their vascular system.
medicalPowerPort Implanted for Chemotherapy or Long-Term IV Access
The Bard PowerPort catheter is surgically implanted by a vascular surgeon or interventional radiologist, typically in an outpatient or short-stay setting. The port reservoir is placed beneath the skin of the upper chest, and the polyurethane catheter is threaded through the subclavian or jugular vein into the superior vena cava near the right atrium. Patients are told the device will provide convenient, reliable venous access for the duration of their treatment — often months to years. The implanting physician and patient are rarely if ever informed by Bard or BD of the polyurethane degradation risk or the possibility of catheter fracture and intravascular fragment migration.
medicalNotable Verdicts & Settlements
Harrington v. Becton Dickinson & Co. (D. Arizona)
Jury VerdictPlaintiff, a 54-year-old breast cancer survivor, suffered a fractured PowerPort catheter that migrated to the right ventricle, causing bacterial endocarditis requiring tricuspid valve replacement. The jury found BD liable under design defect and failure-to-warn theories. Damages included $1.8M for past and future medical expenses and $1.9M for pain and suffering.
Estate of Morales v. C.R. Bard Inc. (D. Arizona)
Jury VerdictWrongful death case in which a 47-year-old lymphoma patient died of septic shock after a fractured PowerPort catheter caused uncontrolled bacteremia. Plaintiff's estate presented internal Bard documents showing the company was aware of polyurethane ESC failure reports and did not issue enhanced physician warnings. Jury awarded $1.5M in punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages.
Kellerman v. Becton Dickinson & Co. (E.D. Pennsylvania)
SettlementPlaintiff developed cardiac tamponade after a fractured PowerPort catheter segment perforated the right ventricular wall. Emergency open heart surgery was required. The plaintiff, a 60-year-old colon cancer survivor, suffered permanent reduced cardiac function. Settlement reached during trial after liability evidence was presented to the jury.
Chen v. Becton Dickinson & Co. (N.D. California)
SettlementPlaintiff, a 42-year-old ovarian cancer survivor, developed pulmonary arterial hypertension after multiple PowerPort catheter fragments lodged in bilateral pulmonary arteries. Imaging confirmed three separate fragment segments. The plaintiff required indefinite pulmonary vasodilator therapy and was permanently disabled from her prior nursing career.
Washington v. C.R. Bard Inc. (S.D. Texas)
SettlementPlaintiff, a 58-year-old Hodgkin lymphoma survivor, required percutaneous cardiac catheterization for retrieval of a PowerPort fragment lodged in the right atrium after developing Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Six-week inpatient IV antibiotic course and two subsequent hospitalizations for relapsing bacteremia were documented. Settlement negotiated prior to bellwether trial.
Patel v. Becton Dickinson & Co. (D. New Jersey)
SettlementPlaintiff, a 50-year-old breast cancer patient, experienced PowerPort catheter fracture that caused pulmonary embolism requiring thrombolysis and prolonged hospitalization. Catheter fragment retrieval was complicated by partial endothelialization; open surgical approach was ultimately required. Plaintiff suffered residual exercise intolerance and chronic anticoagulation dependence.
Nguyen v. C.R. Bard Inc. (N.D. Illinois)
SettlementPlaintiff discovered a fractured PowerPort catheter on routine chest X-ray. Percutaneous snare retrieval successfully removed the fragment from the right atrium without surgical complications. Settlement reflected the successful retrieval with no permanent injury, but compensated plaintiff for the retrieval procedure, associated hospitalization, and psychological distress from learning a fragment had been in her heart for an estimated two years.
Robinson v. Becton Dickinson & Co. (D. Arizona)
SettlementPlaintiff, a 63-year-old prostate cancer patient, presented with catheter aspiration failure. Fluoroscopy confirmed PowerPort catheter fracture with fragment retained near the subclavian-SVC junction. Interventional radiology retrieval was performed successfully as an outpatient procedure. Settlement compensated the plaintiff for the retrieval procedure costs, related medical visits, and pain and suffering without permanent sequelae.
Want the Complete Picture?
View eligibility criteria, settlement information, scientific evidence, and start a free case review.
View Full Bard PowerPort Catheter Case Page