Coal combustion residuals — commonly called coal ash — are the second-largest industrial waste stream in the United States, behind only mining waste. Every coal-fired power plant in the country produces coal ash, and the utility industry has disposed of it for decades by dumping it into unlined surface impoundments (wet ash ponds) and dry landfills, many of them sited directly above drinking water aquifers. The toxic constituents of coal ash — arsenic, hexavalent chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, cadmium, boron, and naturally occurring radioactive materials — migrate through soil into groundwater over time, especially from unlined ponds where water constantly percolates through the ash and carries dissolved metals into the subsurface. Duke Energy is the primary corporate defendant in coal ash contamination litigation. The company operates the largest fleet of coal-fired power plants in the United States and maintains more than 17 coal ash disposal sites in North Carolina alone. The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and independent testing have confirmed that groundwater at virtually all Duke Energy coal ash sites in the state exceeds safe drinking water standards for one or more heavy metals. Thousands of households near these sites rely on private wells — which are not subject to the public water supply testing requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act — and many consumed contaminated water for years before the extent of the problem became known. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), American Electric Power (AEP), Dominion Energy, and other major utilities face similar claims in their respective service territories. The legal landscape shifted dramatically after the 2014 Dan River spill, when a stormwater pipe beneath a Duke Energy coal ash pond at the retired Dan River Steam Station collapsed and released 39,000 tons of toxic ash and 27 million gallons of contaminated water into the Dan River. The disaster prompted federal criminal charges, a $102 million settlement, and the passage of North Carolina's Coal Ash Management Act requiring excavation of high-risk sites. The EPA finalized the Coal Combustion Residuals Rule in 2015 — the first-ever federal regulation of coal ash disposal — and strengthened it in 2024 to cover legacy surface impoundments that had previously been exempted. Individual plaintiffs in communities near coal ash sites are now pursuing cancer claims, medical monitoring, property damage, and diminished property value lawsuits against Duke Energy and other utilities.
From the docket
Litigation Timeline
- July 2026
Lead Plaintiff Deadline Set for Peabody Energy (BTU) Class Actionfiling
The Gross Law Firm issued a notice on July 21, 2026, reminding Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE: BTU) shareholders of a pending class action lawsuit and an August 24, 2026 deadline to seek lead plaintiff status.
- July 2026
EPA Issues Penalties in Two CAFO Enforcement Casesregulatory
EPA's ECHO enforcement database shows two new penalties tied to concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) cases: a $541,110 federal penalty against AMVAC (case 09-2026-4091) and a $1,265,246 federal penalty against Hasa, Inc. (case 09-2026-3564). Facility names, underlying statutes, and filing dates were not specified in the available records.
- July 2026
EPA Enforcement Records Show New Penalties Against Denka Performance Elastomer and Other Facilitiesregulatory
EPA enforcement records show a federal penalty of $996,703 against Denka Performance Elastomer (case 06-2025-0910). Separately, EPA records detected on July 19, 2026 show penalties of $541,110 against an AMVAC facility (case 09-2026-4091) and $1,265,246 against a Hasa, Inc. facility (case 09-2026-3564).
- July 2026
EPA Issues Major Penalties in Chemical Facility Enforcement Actionsregulatory
EPA enforcement records detected in July 2026 show federal penalties issued against multiple chemical facilities. Denka Performance Elastomer was assessed a penalty of $996,703 under EPA case 06-2025-0910. Separate actions recorded penalties of $1,265,246 against Hasa, Inc. and $541,110 against AMVAC. The applicable laws, filing dates, and facility locations were not specified in the available enforcement data.
- July 2026 (detected)
EPA Issues ~$997K Penalty Against Denka Performance Elastomerregulatory
EPA enforcement case 06-2025-0910 lists a federal penalty of $996,703 against Denka Performance Elastomer, according to EPA's ECHO database. The record was detected on July 15, 2026. No further case details — including the specific law cited, filing date, or facility location — were available in the signal.
- July 2026
EPA Issues Penalties Totaling Over $2.8M in Three Enforcement Casesregulatory
EPA enforcement records show three separate penalty actions against chemical facilities. Hasa, Inc. faces the largest penalty at $1,265,246, followed by Denka Performance Elastomer at $996,703, and AMVAC at $541,110. The cases were detected in EPA's enforcement database in July 2026.
- July 2026
EPA Issues Nearly $1M Penalty Against Denka Performance Elastomerregulatory
EPA enforcement records detected in July 2026 show a federal penalty of $996,703 assessed against Denka Performance Elastomer under case number 06-2025-0910, according to the EPA ECHO database. Separate EPA enforcement actions recorded the same period list penalties of $541,110 against AMVAC and $1,265,246 against Hasa, Inc., though specific filing dates, locations, and applicable laws were not included in the available enforcement data.
- July 2026
EPA Issues Combined $1.8M+ in Penalties Against AMVAC and Hasa, Inc.regulatory
The EPA recorded two enforcement actions in July 2026: a $541,110 federal penalty against AMVAC (case 09-2026-4091) and a $1,265,246 federal penalty against Hasa, Inc. (case 09-2026-3564). Both actions were detected on July 12, 2026, via EPA's ECHO enforcement database. No additional details — such as the specific law cited, facility location, or filing date — were included in the available enforcement records.
- July 2026
EPA Issues $1.26M Federal Penalty Against Hasa, Inc.regulatory
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recorded a federal penalty of $1,265,246 against Hasa, Inc. under enforcement case number 09-2026-3564, according to EPA ECHO facility data detected on July 11, 2026. The enforcement record is listed as a CAFO (Compliance Assurance and Federal Order) action. No additional facility location, specific statute, or filing date was included in the available enforcement record.
- July 2026
EPA Issues $1.26M Federal Penalty Against Hasa, Inc.regulatory
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recorded a federal penalty of $1,265,246 against Hasa, Inc. under enforcement case number 09-2026-3564, according to the EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database. The enforcement action was detected on July 10, 2026. No additional details regarding the specific law cited, facility address, or filing date were available in the ECHO record at the time of this entry.
- June 2026
EPA Issues $3.125M Penalty Against WTG Gas Processing Under Consent Decreeregulatory
The U.S. EPA recorded a federal penalty of $3,125,000 against WTG Gas Processing under enforcement case 06-2019-3401, a consent decree covering eight facilities in Texas and New Mexico. The action was logged in EPA's ECHO enforcement database. No specific filing date or underlying statute was listed in the agency record.
- June 2026
EPA Issues $3.125 Million Penalty Against WTG Gas Processingregulatory
The U.S. EPA recorded a $3,125,000 federal penalty against WTG Gas Processing under enforcement case 06-2019-3401, a consent decree covering eight facilities in Texas and New Mexico. The action was logged under the agency's Risk Management Plan (RMP) enforcement program. No filing date or specific statute was listed in the agency record.
Stay informed
Get free updates on the Coal Ash Contamination litigation as it develops
No phone call required. We will email you when there is meaningful news — new filings, settlements, or important deadlines.
Full case details
Want the complete picture?
View eligibility criteria, settlement information, scientific evidence, and start a free case review.
View the full Coal Ash Contamination case page →