455+ Contaminated Military Installations
The Department of Defense has identified PFAS contamination at more than 455 military installations across the United States. The contamination stems from decades of AFFF use in aircraft crash crew training, hangar fire suppression systems, and emergency response operations. The DoD required AFFF at all military airfields under Military Specification MIL-F-24385, meaning every Air Force base, Naval air station, Marine Corps air station, and Army airfield used PFAS-containing foam as a matter of military policy.
The scale of contamination at individual installations is staggering. At NAS China Lake in California, groundwater PFAS concentrations have been measured at over 2 million parts per trillion — more than 500,000 times the EPA drinking water standard of 4 ppt. Patrick Space Force Base in Florida has similarly extreme contamination levels. Myrtle Beach Air Force Base in South Carolina — a decommissioned installation — has PFAS levels exceeding 2 million ppt in areas where fire training occurred. Fort Moore (formerly Fort Benning) in Georgia has PFOS levels of 13,000 ppt.
Military base water systems supplied drinking water to service members, their families, civilian employees, and Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) schools. In many cases, contamination was not detected for decades because PFAS were not included in routine water quality testing. Service members and families drank, cooked with, and bathed in contaminated water without any knowledge of the exposure. Children growing up on contaminated bases experienced developmental exposure during critical windows of vulnerability.
Filing Claims as Military Personnel and Families
Military personnel — active duty, reserve, Guard, retired, and separated — can file AFFF lawsuits against the manufacturers of AFFF (3M, DuPont, Tyco, BASF). The claims target the chemical companies, not the U.S. government or the military. Service records, base assignment history, and military occupational specialty codes provide valuable evidence of exposure. Military firefighters and crash rescue personnel (Air Force AFSC 3E7X1, Marine Corps MOS 7051, Navy DC rating) had the most direct exposure but are not the only eligible claimants.
Military families who lived on contaminated bases have independent claims based on their exposure to contaminated drinking water. Spouses and children who drank base water for extended periods — even if the service member's primary exposure was occupational — have their own exposure pathway. Military dependents' medical records, base housing assignments, and family member identification cards provide documentation of residence on contaminated installations.
VA benefits and AFFF lawsuit compensation are completely separate. You can receive VA disability compensation for a PFAS-linked condition and simultaneously pursue a product liability lawsuit against the AFFF manufacturers. The two processes do not affect each other. The VA has recognized certain cancers in firefighters and has been expanding coverage for conditions linked to environmental exposures during military service.
Scientific Evidence
Meta-Analysis of PFAS Exposure and Cancer Risk: Kidney and Testicular Cancer
Mastrantonio M, Bai E, Uccelli R, Cordiano V, Screpanti A, Corigliano P. (2023). La Medicina del Lavoro
Key Findings
- Relative risk of 1.74 for kidney cancer among individuals with high PFAS exposure compared to low-exposure controls
- Relative risk of 2.22 for testicular cancer among individuals with high PFAS exposure — the strongest relative risk of any PFAS-cancer association
- Dose-response relationship demonstrated: higher PFAS blood levels correlated with progressively higher cancer risk
- Results consistent across multiple study designs and populations, strengthening the causal inference
"The Devil They Knew": Industry Knowledge of PFAS Dangers Since 1970
Brennan NM, Evans AT, Fritz MK, Peak SA, von Holst HE. (2023). Annals of Global Health
Key Findings
- PFAS manufacturers knew about the persistence and toxicity of their products as early as 1970 — more than 50 years before widespread public awareness
- 3M conducted internal studies showing PFAS bioaccumulation in worker blood at 1,000 times normal levels and animal studies showing tumor formation, then classified results as confidential
- Manufacturers used trade secret protections and proprietary research agreements to prevent damaging findings from reaching regulators or the public
- The pattern of corporate concealment parallels the tobacco and asbestos industries and supports punitive damages claims based on willful and malicious conduct
C8 Science Panel: Probable Link Evaluations for PFOA-Associated Diseases
Fletcher T, Savitz D, Steenland K. (2012). Environmental Health Perspectives
Key Findings
- Determined "probable link" between PFOA exposure and six diseases: kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol, and pregnancy-induced hypertension
- Study population of 69,000 residents made it one of the largest PFAS health studies ever conducted, providing exceptional statistical power
- Findings have been cited in virtually every subsequent PFAS lawsuit and regulatory action worldwide
- The "probable link" standard — requiring more than just association but less than definitive proof — was a negotiated scientific threshold that has become the benchmark for PFAS causation evidence
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Pages
3M & DuPont PFAS Lawsuit
3M and DuPont are the two primary defendants in the AFFF/PFAS litigation. 3M manufactured PFOS-based AFFF from the 1960s and has already paid $10.3 billion in water utility settlements and $850 million to Minnesota. DuPont manufactured PFOA and was the target of the landmark Bilott litigation that created the C8 Science Panel. Internal documents from both companies show they knew about PFAS toxicity for decades and concealed it. Their corporate successors — Chemours, Corteva, and others — share in the liability.
AFFF Firefighter Cancer Claims
Firefighters have the highest documented PFAS blood levels of any occupational group and form the core of the AFFF personal injury litigation. Municipal, airport, and military firefighters who trained with AFFF absorbed PFAS through skin contact and inhalation of foam mist, often for years or decades without protective equipment. NIOSH studies show elevated cancer rates among firefighters, and many states have enacted presumptive cancer laws that create favorable conditions for firefighter AFFF claims.
AFFF Kidney Cancer Lawsuit
Kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma) has the strongest scientific link to PFAS exposure of any cancer. IARC classified PFOA as a Group 1 carcinogen based largely on kidney cancer evidence. Meta-analyses show a relative risk of 1.74 for kidney cancer at high PFAS exposure levels. The C8 Science Panel determined a "probable link" between PFOA and kidney cancer based on the 69,000-person Mid-Ohio Valley study. Firefighters and military personnel with kidney cancer and AFFF exposure history have among the strongest claims in MDL 2873.
AFFF Settlement Amounts
AFFF/PFAS litigation has produced over $12.5 billion in water utility settlements and $670.7 million in C8 personal injury settlements. The personal injury track in MDL 2873 — with 15,216+ claims — is advancing toward bellwether trials that will establish settlement benchmarks. Based on the C8 precedent (averaging ~$189,000 per claim) and the severity of PFAS-linked conditions, projected personal injury settlements range from $25,000 for moderate cases to $2 million or more for severe cases.
AFFF Testicular Cancer Lawsuit
Testicular cancer has the highest relative risk of any PFAS-linked cancer, with meta-analyses showing RR=2.22 for high PFAS exposure — meaning more than double the cancer risk. The C8 Science Panel determined a "probable link" between PFOA and testicular cancer. Testicular cancer is most common in younger men (ages 15-35), making it particularly relevant for military personnel and younger firefighters exposed to AFFF early in their careers.
AFFF Thyroid Disease Lawsuit
Thyroid disease is one of six conditions with a C8 Science Panel "probable link" to PFOA exposure. PFAS are potent endocrine disruptors that interfere with thyroid hormone synthesis and metabolism, causing hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and thyroid cancer. Thyroid disease is often the earliest clinical manifestation of PFAS exposure and may affect a broader population than PFAS-linked cancers, making it significant for the AFFF litigation.
AFFF Water Contamination Lawsuit
PFAS from AFFF have contaminated the drinking water of an estimated 100 million Americans. Water utility settlements exceeding $12.5 billion have been approved in MDL 2873, but personal injury claims from individuals who drank contaminated water remain active. The EPA's 2024 drinking water standard of 4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS confirmed that previously "safe" levels were actually harmful. Community residents who developed PFAS-linked diseases from contaminated water have viable personal injury claims.
AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit
AFFF firefighting foam containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has been used since the 1960s at military bases, airports, and fire training facilities across the United States. These "forever chemicals" do not break down in the environment and have contaminated groundwater, soil, and drinking water supplies serving millions of Americans. The C8 Science Panel established "probable links" between PFAS exposure and six diseases including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and thyroid disease. MDL 2873, consolidated before Judge Richard Gergel in the District of South Carolina, encompasses over 15,216 personal injury claims against manufacturers including 3M, DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Products, and BASF. Water utility settlements exceeding $12.5 billion have been approved, and the personal injury track is advancing toward bellwether trials with Daubert motions and expert depositions underway.
View full case overview