Injury guide
Have a testicular cancer diagnosis and past contact with fire foam? Save your reports and exposure history.
Updated Oct 4, 202619 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 202619 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
Richard M. Gergel · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina · United States District Judge
Finding: The August 31, 2026 order sets expert-motion dates for thyroid and liver cancer. It does not set an individual payment.
District of South Carolina: CMO33F (opens in a new tab) · Aug 31, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
International Agency for Research on Cancer · World Health Organization · Publisher of the cancer hazard assessment
Finding: PFOA is classed as able to cause cancer; PFOS as possibly able to cause cancer. The classifications do not measure individual risk at a given dose.
IARC: PFOA/PFOS evaluation Q&A (opens in a new tab) · Dec 1, 2023 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
International Agency for Research on Cancer · 2023
Read the source: PFOA and PFOS cancer hazard evaluation (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Not covered by this case
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
Have a testicular cancer diagnosis and past contact with fire foam? Save your reports and exposure history. Care and a claim each need their own review.
It is cancer in one or both testicles. There are different types. Ask which type is named in your report.
NCI explains that most starts in cells that make sperm. The two main germ-cell types grow and respond to care in different ways. A broad cancer label does not replace the exact record.
Tell a doctor about a lump, swelling or pain. These signs can have other causes. Do not wait for a legal review to ask about them.
A change in how a testicle feels or discomfort can warrant a check even if you are unsure about foam exposure. NCI’s symptom guide does not diagnose a reader or assign a cause.
Your doctor may use an exam, scans and blood tests. Ask what the results mean. The care plan depends on the cancer and your own needs.
The NCI guide describes ultrasound and tumor-marker tests as possible parts of diagnosis. Tissue examination can identify the type. Its treatment guide includes several approaches; not everyone needs the same one.
Ask your care team about effects on fertility before treatment. This is a health discussion, not a step you must take to fit a claim page.
Some research links PFOA with this cancer. That does not prove foam caused your illness. Blood PFAS tests cannot tell you your future health.
IARC’s review found limited human evidence for testicular cancer and PFOA. Its overall hazard finding draws on more than human studies. Do not apply it to every chemical or as a personal diagnosis.
ATSDR advises discussing your exposure history and care with a clinician. A blood result measures exposure to certain PFAS; it does not settle the cause of a tumor.
Have a diagnosis and a history with foam or affected water? A lawyer can review the records. There is no automatic acceptance rule on this page.
Keep the names of work sites, duties and products you recall. Note uncertainty instead of guessing a brand or dose. Health evidence and the legal responsibility of a company each need review.
Save the cancer report and your exposure dates. Ask about legal time limits and fees in writing. Keep care appointments separate from the claim.
Ask your covered provider about copies of health records. A lawyer should explain the deadline for your claim and the fee and expense terms before you agree. A court schedule for other cancers does not set your deadline.
Relative risk of 1.74 for kidney cancer among individuals with high PFAS exposure compared to low-exposure controls
PFAS manufacturers knew about the persistence and toxicity of their products as early as 1970 — more than 50 years before widespread public awareness
Determined "probable link" between PFOA exposure and six diseases: kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol, and pregnancy-induced hypertension
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Register your interestTesticular cancer has a relative risk of 2.22 at high PFAS exposure — more than double the risk of unexposed individuals and the highest RR of any PFAS-linked cancer. Researchers believe this is because the testes are highly sensitive to endocrine-disrupting chemicals like PFAS, which interfere with hormonal signaling critical to reproductive tissue homeostasis. PFAS accumulate in reproductive organs, and the testes are exposed to systemic PFAS through blood circulation. The young age of onset for testicular cancer (15-35) means that military personnel and firefighters exposed to AFFF during early career years are at peak vulnerability. The C8 Science Panel confirmed the "probable link" through dose-response data showing progressively higher testicular cancer rates with higher PFOA blood levels.
Yes. The legal claim is based on the fact that you were diagnosed with testicular cancer and that your diagnosis was caused by PFAS exposure from AFFF — not on your current health status. Even if your treatment was successful and you are in remission, you suffered a compensable injury: the cancer diagnosis itself, the surgery (orchiectomy), any chemotherapy or radiation treatment, the emotional distress of a cancer diagnosis, lost wages during treatment, and potential fertility impacts are all elements of damages. No settlement has been announced. What any claim is worth depends on its facts, and no one can promise an amount. Filing deadlines apply to these claims. Whether that time has passed depends on your facts, so don't rule yourself out. A lawyer can tell you.
Three jury trials in the C8 litigation against DuPont ended in verdicts for the plaintiffs. Two of these involved testicular cancer. The C8 results do not predict what any AFFF claim is worth.
Checked against 17 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026