Injury guide

Port tube movement: read the scan report

A port tube may be out of its intended position. Ask your care team what the finding means.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202614 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Identify the Bard device in the implant record.
  • Review the medical finding and care before and after placement.
  • Ask about dates, applicable law and the firm’s current acceptance rules.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

David G. Campbell · United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Senior United States District Judge

Finding: The September 25, 2026 order denied a request to end the Lattanzio case before trial because factual issues remained. It did not award a personal payment.

Lattanzio individual ruling, September 25, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · Sep 25, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Takatoshi Nakamura · Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan · First-listed author of the PowerPort cohort study

Finding: The 132-person study recorded infections, a kink and leaks, with no observed tube breakage. This small hospital cohort does not decide the cause of another patient’s injury.

Nakamura original PowerPort cohort, 2017 (opens in a new tab) · Mar 10, 2017 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · 2017

Complications after implantation of subcutaneous central venous ports (PowerPort)

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
132 patients with PowerPort implants at one hospital
Finding:
Eight patients had recorded complications: four infections, one kink and three leaks. No breakage was observed.
Main limitation
Small, one-hospital observational sample without a direct earlier-port comparison. It cannot prove individual cause or describe every device model.

Read the source: Complications after implantation of subcutaneous central venous ports (PowerPort) (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What is catheter migration?
It means the tube has moved from its intended place. BD lists changes in the tip’s position as a possible problem. Ask your doctor what your scan shows. [14]
What signs should I discuss with a doctor?
Tell the care team about new pain or swelling. Call about port-site changes, fever or chills. These signs do not identify the cause by themselves. [5]
How is tube movement diagnosed and treated?
Ask what imaging or examination found. Ask what care is needed for that finding. A legal page cannot choose the procedure. [5]
What does the original study say about migration?
No migration was observed in the 132-person study. That is a result in one hospital sample. It does not prove movement can never happen. [3]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A port complication alone does not prove a product defect.
  • This page cannot decide individual cause, a filing date or payment.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

When it fits this case

  • Identify the Bard device in the implant record.
  • Review the medical finding and care before and after placement.
  • Ask about dates, applicable law and the firm’s current acceptance rules.

A port tube may be out of its intended position. Ask your care team what the finding means. A scan result alone does not decide a device claim.

What is catheter migration?

It means the tube has moved from its intended place. BD lists changes in the tip’s position as a possible problem. Ask your doctor what your scan shows.

A port is under the skin and connects to a tube in a vein. Ask which part moved and what the report actually shows. Do not confuse a tube position with movement of the whole port.

What signs should I discuss with a doctor?

Tell the care team about new pain or swelling. Call about port-site changes, fever or chills. These signs do not identify the cause by themselves.

MSK’s guide gives contact advice for these concerns. Your care team can decide whether the port needs assessment. Do not access or move it yourself to see whether it works.

How is tube movement diagnosed and treated?

Ask what imaging or examination found. Ask what care is needed for that finding. A legal page cannot choose the procedure.

The hospital study used chest imaging and medical records to check port placement and later problems. Its methods are not a universal test schedule. Obtain the report rather than relying on a remembered description.

What does the original study say about migration?

No migration was observed in the 132-person study. That is a result in one hospital sample. It does not prove movement can never happen.

The sample and follow-up limit what can be inferred. The researchers could not directly compare all earlier port systems. Do not turn an absence in that study into a finding about your own device.

What records help explain the change over time?

Keep earlier and later scan reports with their dates. Include the placement and removal notes you have. Ask the provider for a missing report.

A comparison should use actual records rather than a sketch drawn from memory. Tell the reviewer if different clinicians used different terms. Keep a note of which question the care team has not yet resolved.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Ask a law firm to review your case

Sources

  1. Lattanzio individual ruling, September 25, 2026Lattanzio individual ruling, September 25, 2026 · court
  2. GovInfo court docket attribution, September 25, 2026GovInfo court docket attribution, September 25, 2026 · court
  3. Nakamura original PowerPort cohort, 2017Nakamura original PowerPort cohort, 2017 · study
  4. FDA lot-specific PowerPort recall Z-1570-2020FDA lot-specific PowerPort recall Z-1570-2020 · regulator
  5. MSK first-party implanted-port care guidance (updated September 29, 2025)MSK first-party implanted-port care guidance (updated September 29, 2025)
  6. HHS: Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
  7. Federal courts: civil casesFederal courts: civil cases · court
  8. ABA: fees paid from a successful claimABA: fees paid from a successful claim
  9. SDNY: filing time limitsSDNY: filing time limits · court
  10. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  11. FDA Issues Multiple Class I Recalls for Arrow International Vascular Access Kitsapi.fda.gov · Jun 30, 2026 · regulator
  12. MDL 3081 (D. Ariz., Judge David G. Campbell) CMO No. 41 adjusted the bellwether trial schedule after the parties filed 52 Rule 702/56 motions: Cook (23-cv-01975) Apr 21-May 8, 2026; Miller (24-cv-00621) Jul 7-24, 2026; Lattanzio (24-cv-00680) Aug 18-Sep 4, 2026; Divelbliss (23-cv-01627) Oct 13-30, 2026; Hicks (23-cv-01703) Dec 1-18, 2026; Sorensen (23-cv-02557) Feb 2-19, 2027. Verified from the court order itself (Doc 6028).nighgoldenberg.com · Nov 14, 2025 · court
  13. FDA Issues Class I Recall for Bard Power-Trialysis Dialysis Catheterapi.fda.gov · Sep 29, 2026 · regulator
  14. BD: PowerPort safety information (manufacturer source)

Checked against 11 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026