Case guide

UPDATED FEB 2026

Hernia Mesh Infection Claims

Part of the Hernia Mesh (Davol/C.R. Bard) investigation

The short answer

Hernia mesh infection is a devastating complication because bacteria colonize the mesh material in treatment-resistant biofilms, usually requiring complete surgical removal. Mesh design characteristics — including pore size, material composition, and surface coatings — directly affect infection susceptibility, creating strong product liability theories.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated February 20, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day

Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.

Why Mesh Infections Are Different from Normal Wound Infections

A normal soft tissue wound infection — one not involving a foreign implant — can typically be resolved with a course of appropriate antibiotics because the body's immune cells can access the infected tissue and the antibiotics can penetrate the infection. Mesh infections are fundamentally different because bacteria colonize the mesh surface and form biofilms — complex bacterial communities protected by a polysaccharide matrix that prevents antibiotic penetration and resists immune cell attack. Once a biofilm is established, the mesh effectively becomes a permanent reservoir of infection that antibiotics can suppress but rarely eliminate.

Mesh Design and Infection Risk

Scientific literature has established that mesh pore size directly affects infection risk. Mesh with pores smaller than 75 micrometers in diameter creates protected niches that macrophages and neutrophils — the immune cells that fight bacteria — cannot enter because they are too large. These protected niches allow bacteria to proliferate beyond the reach of both the immune system and antibiotics. Heavyweight, small-pore mesh products (including some Bard designs) are associated with higher infection rates than large-pore, lightweight mesh in comparative studies. Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers chose smaller pore architectures for handling and structural reasons while knowing they created elevated infection risk.

Clinical Course of Mesh Infection

Mesh infections may present acutely within weeks of surgery or as a delayed chronic infection months or years after implantation. Acute presentations involve wound redness, swelling, purulent drainage, and fever requiring prompt medical attention. Chronic presentations may involve a persistent draining sinus tract — a tunnel from the infected mesh to the skin surface — with intermittent drainage that the patient and physician may initially mistake for a simple wound healing problem. The diagnosis is established by wound culture, imaging (CT scan or MRI showing fluid collection), and clinical correlation. Treatment typically begins with prolonged antibiotic therapy followed by surgical exploration and ultimately explantation when antibiotics fail.

Sepsis and Life-Threatening Mesh Infection

In the most severe cases, mesh infection progresses to sepsis — a systemic inflammatory response to infection that causes organ dysfunction and can rapidly become life-threatening. Sepsis from mesh infection requires ICU-level care, broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and emergency surgical debridement and mesh removal. Mortality from sepsis in surgical patients exceeds 20 percent in some cohorts. Survivors of septic mesh infection may have permanent organ damage, and the combined medical costs of sepsis treatment plus mesh explantation surgery can exceed $200,000. These cases represent the highest-value claims in hernia mesh litigation.

Key data

Data & Statistics

3 SOURCED FIGURES

75 microns

Biomaterials (peer-reviewed journal)

60%

Annals of Surgery

>20%

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Hernia mesh litigation is a mass tort action against manufacturers of defective synthetic mesh implants used in hernia repair surgery. The primary defendants are Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard (now part of Becton Dickinson), Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson), Atrium Medical, and Covidien (now part of Medtronic). These companies manufactured polypropylene and composite mesh devices that have been associated with serious complications including mesh migration, adhesion, infection, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction. Thousands of patients have filed claims in MDL 2846 in the Southern District of Ohio and in state court coordinations.

Dive deeper

Related Guides

11 GUIDES

The full investigation

Part of the Hernia Mesh (Davol/C.R. Bard) Investigation