Case guide
Keep the product, spraying and health records from your work. The worker study and the new court ruling both matter to a careful claim check.
Updated Oct 4, 202615 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 202615 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
International Agency for Research on Cancer · World Health Organization · Cancer agency issuing the March 2015 evaluation
Finding: The agency classified glyphosate as a probable human cancer hazard using limited human evidence and animal evidence.
IARC glyphosate evaluation, March 20, 2015 (opens in a new tab) · Mar 20, 2015 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
National Cancer Institute and Agricultural Health Study collaborators · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018
Read the source: Glyphosate Use and Cancer Incidence in the Agricultural Health Study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization · 2015
Read the source: IARC Monographs Volume 112 glyphosate evaluation (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
List the products, places, tasks and dates you remember. Keep labels, receipts and work records you already have lawful access to.
The Agricultural Health Study examined licensed pesticide applicators, not every type of farm worker. Tell the lawyer whether you mixed, sprayed, directed work or had another exposure concern. Ask what evidence supports your actual account rather than using a study’s job description as an eligibility rule.
The study found no overall link with lymphoma or its types. That finding matters to a balanced review of a claim.
The study followed 54,251 licensed pesticide users; 44,932 reported glyphosate use. It matched reported use with cancer registry records. This was not a trial. It cannot prove the cause of one worker’s illness or describe each type of work exposure.
IARC says glyphosate probably can cause cancer. EPA’s view differs; it plans a new health review in late 2026.
IARC used limited human evidence about lymphoma and enough evidence in animals. Limited means chance or other explanations were not ruled out. These findings do not decide your own diagnosis or claim. Give your care team and lawyer the work and health history you have.
The Supreme Court ruled against Durnell’s cancer-label warning claim on June 25, 2026. It applied federal pesticide law to that claim.
The ruling reversed the Missouri judgment and sent the case back. It does not say that every possible Roundup case ended. Ask how it affects your own claim and the parties involved. Your job title alone cannot decide the legal result.
Ask the lawyer to check the actual notice and your history. The proposed King program has membership and payment rules that differ.
The program notice lists exposure dates and rules on earlier federal cases, residence and other facts. Being part of the class is not the same as meeting its payment rules. Keep notices, releases and past case records. Ask what rights a release would affect before you choose a step.
Request medical and billing records and keep the job history beside them. Ask promptly for a personal claim and time-limit check.
Covered record access has exceptions and may involve copy charges. Do not assume a program-choice date is your civil filing limit. Before hiring a lawyer, ask about the recovery share and separate expenses, including costs after a loss, and who would handle the next filing step.
41% increased risk of NHL among highest-exposed individuals (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.13-1.75)
Classified glyphosate as Group 2A — "probably carcinogenic to humans"
No statistically significant overall association between glyphosate and NHL in the full cohort
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Register your interestChecked against 12 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026