Case guide
Ask which maker and legal duty fit the product you used. The 2026 ruling bars one cancer-label claim; it does not decide every possible case.
Updated Oct 4, 202615 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 202615 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
International Agency for Research on Cancer · World Health Organization · Cancer agency issuing the March 2015 evaluation
Finding: The agency classified glyphosate as a probable human cancer hazard using limited human evidence and animal evidence.
IARC glyphosate evaluation, March 20, 2015 (opens in a new tab) · Mar 20, 2015 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
National Cancer Institute and Agricultural Health Study collaborators · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018
Read the source: Glyphosate Use and Cancer Incidence in the Agricultural Health Study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization · 2015
Read the source: IARC Monographs Volume 112 glyphosate evaluation (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
Ask which company and product your records identify. A claim needs facts about harm and who may be at fault.
The Supreme Court opinion identifies Monsanto as the maker and seller in Durnell’s case. That caption does not list every party liable for each product. Keep your label and use dates. Ask a lawyer which company the records identify and what law applies to it.
It ruled that federal pesticide law bars Durnell’s claim requiring a cancer warning on the label. The decision was issued June 25, 2026.
The Court reversed the Missouri judgment and sent the case back. This is a holding about the warning duty at issue; it is not a statement that no other claim can exist. Ask which alleged legal duty your own proposed case relies on and how the ruling affects it.
A study or agency view does not decide a company’s duty to you. Each finding also has limits.
IARC’s view of cancer hazard differs from EPA’s view. A study of licensed pesticide users found no overall link with lymphoma. Both findings matter, with their limits. A lawyer still needs to check your product, harm, parties and claim.
A proposed deal needs a review of its own terms. It is not a court finding that the company caused each person’s harm.
The program notice describes a proposed deal and rules for who can join or be paid. It says the court will decide approval after the September 14 hearing. Ask for the latest court order before treating proposed terms as final. Keep any release you have signed.
Keep product labels, use dates, care records and any earlier legal notice. Ask what is missing before choosing a party or theory.
Patients generally can request covered medical and billing records, subject to exceptions and copying charges. Give the lawyer your actual product and health history. Ask how any earlier lawsuit or release affects the options, instead of assuming the current company name resolves historical responsibility.
Ask about the legal duty, deadline and effect of any proposed release. Read the fee and expense terms before agreeing.
A time limit depends on the law and claim, not a company name alone. An agreed recovery share and separate case expenses can affect what you receive or owe. Ask who will handle the matter and who is responsible for checking dates and filing any required papers.
41% increased risk of NHL among highest-exposed individuals (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.13-1.75)
Classified glyphosate as Group 2A — "probably carcinogenic to humans"
No statistically significant overall association between glyphosate and NHL in the full cohort
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Register your interestChecked against 12 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026