Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold
Quick Eligibility Review
Answer one question at a time. This usually takes under 2 minutes.
Check your eligibility — free
Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.
Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day
Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.
Commercial vs. Private Property: The Settlement Gap
The type of property where your fall occurred is the first major determinant of case value. Commercial premises liability claims — involving stores, restaurants, office buildings, hotels, parking structures, and other business properties — average approximately $345,000 in settlements nationally. Private property claims — falls at a neighbor's home, a private driveway, or a residential property — average approximately $105,000. This gap exists because commercial property owners carry larger liability insurance policies, have institutional resources to pay claims, and face more documented evidence of inspection failures that support stronger liability arguments.
Settlement Ranges by Injury Type
Soft tissue injuries (sprains, strains, no imaging confirmation): $15,000–$75,000. Broken wrist or shoulder requiring casting: $40,000–$100,000. Broken ankle requiring surgery (ORIF): $80,000–$200,000. Hip fracture requiring surgery (ORIF or hip replacement): $150,000–$500,000. Lumbar or cervical disc herniation with surgery: $200,000–$750,000. Traumatic brain injury with neuroimaging documentation: $250,000–$2,000,000+. Spinal cord injury with permanent disability: $1,000,000–$5,000,000+. Wrongful death from fall-related injuries: $1,500,000–$15,000,000+.
Documentation Multipliers: How Evidence Increases Case Value
Three documentation factors that reliably increase settlement outcomes: (1) Surgery required — cases requiring surgery settle 3.2x higher than comparable non-surgical cases, because surgical records provide objective proof of injury severity that is difficult for insurers to contest; (2) TBI with neuroimaging — CT or MRI imaging confirming intracranial injury increases settlements by approximately 45% over baseline soft tissue cases, because imaging provides objective evidence of the brain injury that subjective symptom complaints cannot achieve alone; (3) Immediate post-accident MRI for spinal injuries — spinal injury cases where an MRI was performed within days of the fall settle approximately 60% higher than cases where MRI was delayed by weeks or months, because immediate imaging defeats the insurer's argument that the disc herniation or spinal injury was pre-existing and unrelated to the fall.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
The full investigation