Case guide
A warning claim asks what the maker should have told users. The FDA warning and court allegations do not decide your own case.
Updated Oct 4, 202610 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 202610 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
Mahyar Etminan · Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia · Lead author of the dental claims-database study
Finding: The study recorded more dental problems among users of medicine held under the tongue than in its comparison groups.
Etminan and colleagues: dental disease cohort, JAMA 2022 (opens in a new tab) · Dec 13, 2022 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
University of British Columbia · JAMA · 2022
Read the source: Association Between Sublingual Buprenorphine-Naloxone Exposure and Dental Disease (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
It asks whether the maker failed to give a needed warning. The Suboxone court page describes that allegation about tooth damage from film.
An allegation is a claim that still needs proof. The court identifies common questions about cause, product testing and warning content. Keep the label or patient leaflet from the time you used the product, and ask a lawyer which company and warning your facts concern.
On January 12, 2022, FDA called for new dental warnings. Its alert covers Suboxone and generic drugs that dissolve in the mouth.
FDA reports describe decay, infection and tooth loss, including people without earlier dental problems. An agency warning is different from a court ruling that a maker is responsible for your injury. Ask how the label history and your treatment dates fit together.
The study found an association in health records. It does not settle the maker’s duty or the cause of your own damage.
Missing hygiene data, other possible differences between groups and physician-only recorded events limit the finding. Give your lawyer the full care history rather than treating the study as a substitute for dental records. Tell your dentist the exact medicine and route used.
Keep pharmacy records and copies of packaging or leaflets you have. List any changes in product or maker over time.
The warning covers tablets and films that dissolve in the mouth; not every buprenorphine route is the same. Ask the pharmacy which details its dispensing record contains. Note when a warning was supplied, but do not fill a gap in memory with a date from another patient’s account.
There is no single filing date established by this guide. Ask a lawyer to check the law, claim and your own dates soon.
A filing limit requires a legal check and can depend on the claim and place. Bring dates of use, dental care and what you were told. Do not rule yourself out, or assume the January 2022 alert gives everyone a new clock.
Ask which firm would handle the warning claim and what it needs next. Read its fees and expense terms before you agree.
A success-based fee is an agreed share of a recovery; case expenses are a separate question and may remain due after a loss. Ask whether first contact is only a request for advice, whether the firm has accepted representation and who will file any court papers.
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Register your interestChecked against 10 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026