Case trackerEmerging
Cartiva toe implant lawsuit: who may qualify and what comes next Updates
Updated Oct 6, 2026
If you had a Cartiva implant in your big toe and later needed it removed or your joint fused, you may have a claim. Federal cases are grouped before one judge in Arkansas.
Register interestFollow the record
No source-linked updates are available here yet. The case guide has the current information and eligibility details.
Sources
- JPML Transfer Order, In re Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3172, Doc. 27 (Feb. 5, 2026)JPML transfer order, MDL 3172 · court
- JPML, MDL Statistics Report: Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending (Oct. 1, 2026)JPML pending report, Oct. 1, 2026 (by actions) · court
- JPML, MDL Statistics Report: Docket Summary Listing by MDL Number (Oct. 1, 2026)JPML pending report, Oct. 1, 2026 (by MDL number) · court
- In re Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Products Liability Litigation, No. 4:26-md-03172-KGB (E.D. Ark.), Initial Management Order, Dkt. 24 (Aug. 31, 2026)Initial management order, Aug. 31, 2026 · court
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas: Multidistrict Litigation 3172 (In re Cartiva) pageE.D. Ark. MDL 3172 page · court
- CourtListener docket: In re Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Products Liability Litigation, 4:26-md-03172 (E.D. Ark.)CourtListener docket, MDL 3172 · court
- FDA Premarket Approval database: Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant, P150017FDA PMA record P150017 · regulator
- FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant, PMA P150017FDA safety and effectiveness summary · regulator
- FDA Medical Device Recall database: Class 2 Device Recall Cartiva, Z-0598-2025FDA recall Z-0598-2025 · regulator
- FDA: What is a medical device recall?FDA: What is a medical device recall? · regulator
- FDA: Premarket Approval (PMA)FDA: Premarket approval · regulator
- FDA: Unique Device Identification System (UDI System)FDA: Unique device identifiers · regulator
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)Riegel v. Medtronic (2008) · regulator
- Stryker news release: Stryker completes acquisition of Wright Medical (Nov. 11, 2020)Stryker news release, Nov. 2020
- Butler JJ et al. Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus is associated with a high complication rate and moderate failure rate at short-term follow-up: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(4):1765-1778Butler et al., 2024 · study
- Jeremic A, Abussa R. Cartiva or fusion for Hallux Rigidus? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2026;65(4):138.e1-138.e6Jeremic and Abussa, 2026 · study
- Glazebrook H et al. Failures of Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant for Hallux Rigidus and Outcomes of Revision to Arthrodesis: Mid-Term to Long-Term Results. Foot Ankle Spec. 2025Glazebrook et al., 2025 · study
- Cassinelli SJ et al. Early Outcomes and Complications of Synthetic Cartilage Implant for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(10):1140-1148Cassinelli et al., 2019 · study
- Shimozono Y, Hurley ET, Kennedy JG. Early Failures of Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(3):340-346Shimozono et al., 2021 · study
- 28 U.S.C. § 1407: Multidistrict litigation (Cornell LII)28 U.S.C. § 1407
- ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5: FeesABA Model Rule 1.5
- S.D.N.Y. Pro Se FAQ: How long do I have to file my complaint (statute of limitations)?SDNY: filing time limits · court
- HHS: Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
Want the complete picture?
Read the case guide for eligibility, evidence and your next steps.