Case guide

Problems With an AngioDynamics Port? Signs and Records

Some port problems cause clear signs, and some cause none. Here is what to tell your care team and which records show a break, clot or infection.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Does this case involve physical injury, a medical diagnosis, or significant financial loss? *

Updated Oct 5, 202636 sources

This may apply to you if

  • You had an AngioDynamics or Navilyst port under your skin, such as a Smart Port, BioFlo, Vortex or Xcela port.
  • You later had a broken catheter, an infection or a blood clot tied to the port.
  • You can get records that show which port you had, such as its model or lot number.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

U.S. National Library of Medicine (MedlinePlus) · National Institutes of Health · Publisher of the patient page on implanted ports

Finding: MedlinePlus tells patients to contact a provider right away if the port seems to have moved, the site is red, swollen or warm, there is drainage or pain, there is a fever over 100.4°F, or the port cannot be accessed.

MedlinePlus: Central venous catheters - ports (opens in a new tab) · Jun 4, 2026 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

Alexey Surov · Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany · First author of a systematic review of catheter embolization

Finding: In 215 published cases of catheter embolization, catheter malfunction was the most common sign (56.3%) and 24.2% were without symptoms; pinch-off syndrome was the most common cause (40.9%).

Surov et al., JPEN, 2009 (opens in a new tab) · Aug 12, 2009 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany (first author) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2009

Intravascular embolization of venous catheter: causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
215 published cases from 1985 to 2007, 143 of them port catheters.
Finding:
A catheter that stopped working was the most common sign (56%); about 1 in 4 cases had no symptoms; pinch-off was the most common cause (41%).
Main limitation
A review of published case reports, which over-represent unusual cases; its summary names no brands, and it does not show how often catheters break.

Read the source: Intravascular embolization of venous catheter: causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

St. Elizabeth Health Center, Youngstown, Ohio · American Surgeon · 2004

Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
109 published cases plus 3 new cases.
Finding:
Pinch-off appeared 5.3 months after placement on average (from right away to 60 months); a chest X-ray can show a warning sign before a break.
Main limitation
A review of case reports about long-term catheters in general, with no comparison group; its summary names no brands and cannot show how often pinch-off happens.

Read the source: Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff · British Journal of Haematology · 2013

Catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
A review of research on clots linked to central catheters; no new patient group.
Finding:
Most catheter-related clots cause no symptoms; Doppler ultrasound or venography is used to find them.
Main limitation
A narrative review about central catheters in general, not ports from one maker.

Read the source: Catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine · Medicine · 2025

Silent port catheter fracture with normal infusion: A case report and literature review

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
One patient (case report), with a review of past reports.
Finding:
A chest port tube broke without pain or trouble with infusions; it was found when blood could not be drawn back, and a chest X-ray confirmed it.
Main limitation
One person’s story; it cannot show how often this happens.

Read the source: Silent port catheter fracture with normal infusion: A case report and literature review (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

Institut Pasteur, Paris · Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2014

Management of infections related to totally implantable venous-access ports: challenges and perspectives

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
A review of research; no new patient group.
Finding:
Some port infections lead to removing the port; others may be treated with antibiotics, including an antibiotic lock inside the port.
Main limitation
A narrative review about ports in general, not one maker; read at abstract level.

Read the source: Management of infections related to totally implantable venous-access ports: challenges and perspectives (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The short answer

Which port signs should I report to my care team?
Call your care team right away if your port seems to have moved, or the skin around it is red, warm or swollen. Also call for yellow or green fluid, pain at the site, or a fever over 100.4°F. Tell them if the port cannot be reached with the special needle. [28]
Can a port catheter break without any signs?
Yes. In a review of 215 published cases where a piece of catheter broke off and traveled in the blood, 143 of them from ports, about 1 in 4 people had no symptoms. The most common sign was a catheter that stopped working right. [29]
How do doctors find a clot or an infection from a port?
Most clots linked to a catheter cause no symptoms, so a doctor has to suspect one to find it. Then an ultrasound of the vein may be used. Another test is a venogram, an X-ray of the vein taken with dye. [30]
Which records show what happened to my port?
Ask for your scan reports and the images, and lab results such as blood cultures. Also ask for the report from any procedure to take out the port or a broken piece. Lab and pathology reports help too. [9]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This page is not medical advice. Your doctor decides whether a port should stay in or come out.
  • It cannot say whether your port caused your problem.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Which port signs should I report to my care team?

Call your care team right away if your port seems to have moved, or the skin around it is red, warm or swollen. Also call for yellow or green fluid, pain at the site, or a fever over 100.4°F. Tell them if the port cannot be reached with the special needle.

These are the signs listed by MedlinePlus, a health site run by the National Library of Medicine. It also says a port needs flushing about once a month to help keep clots from forming.

Can a port catheter break without any signs?

Yes. In a review of 215 published cases where a piece of catheter broke off and traveled in the blood, 143 of them from ports, about 1 in 4 people had no symptoms. The most common sign was a catheter that stopped working right.

In about 41% of those cases, the cause was pinch-off. That happens when the tube is squeezed between the collarbone and the first rib. A chest X-ray may show a dent in the tube there, which can be an early warning sign. A review of 109 published pinch-off cases found it showed up 5.3 months after the tube went in, on average.

In one case report from 2025, a broken tube still let medicine flow with no pain. The break was found over three years after the port went in, when blood could not be drawn back. A chest X-ray then confirmed it.

In the review of 215 cases, most broken pieces were taken out through a vein with a thin tube, not open surgery. Only your doctor can say what your own scans show.

How do doctors find a clot or an infection from a port?

Most clots linked to a catheter cause no symptoms, so a doctor has to suspect one to find it. Then an ultrasound of the vein may be used. Another test is a venogram, an X-ray of the vein taken with dye.

A clot near a catheter can lead to a clot in the lungs, an infection or a catheter that stops working. A review of port infections says some lead to removing the port. Others may be treated with antibiotics, including a dose left inside the port.

Lawsuits in the case describe how problems were found. One says blood cultures kept coming back positive and doctors traced the infection to the port. Another says a CT scan showed a large clot linked to the catheter.

Which records show what happened to my port?

Ask for your scan reports and the images, and lab results such as blood cultures. Also ask for the report from any procedure to take out the port or a broken piece. Lab and pathology reports help too.

A draft records release in the court case lists the same kinds of papers. It names surgery reports, lab and pathology reports, and billing records. It also names scan images on film or disc, and scan reports.

The draft form also asks who used and flushed the port, so ask for notes from those visits.

Ask each hospital and clinic in writing. Under the federal health privacy rule, they must act within 30 days and may extend once, by up to 30 more days. Ask for images on a disc or in another format you can use.

What if my port or a piece of it was taken out?

Find out whether anyone kept it. The draft court form asks whether the removed port or any piece was saved, and who has it now. It also asks for any photos or video of it.

Talk to your doctor before any change to your port. Only your care team can decide whether a port should come out. If a procedure is already planned, ask what will happen to the port.

You can report a port problem to FDA yourself, online through MedWatch or on Form FDA 3500B. FDA says its report database alone cannot show how often a problem happens or what caused it.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. JPML Transfer Order, In re AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc., Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3125 (Oct. 3, 2024)JPML transfer order, MDL 3125 · court
  2. JPML, Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending (report date Oct. 1, 2026)JPML pending MDL report, Oct. 1, 2026 · court
  3. JPML, Pending MDL Dockets by MDL Number (report date Oct. 1, 2026)JPML pending MDLs by number, Oct. 1, 2026 · court
  4. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Stipulated Case Management Order No. 1 (Direct Filing, Service of Process, Attorney Registration), Dkt. 152 (Jan. 27, 2025)MDL 3125 Case Management Order 1 · court
  5. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Case Management Order No. 6 (bellwether selection and profile forms), Dkt. 442 (Oct. 14, 2025)MDL 3125 Case Management Order 6 · court
  6. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Case Management Order No. 7 (common-issue schedule), Dkt. 466 (Oct. 31, 2025)MDL 3125 Case Management Order 7 · court
  7. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, Dkt. 239 (Apr. 24, 2025)MDL 3125 order on time-limit motions, Apr. 2025 · court
  8. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Dkts. 384, 385], Dkt. 501 (Nov. 14, 2025)MDL 3125 order on time-limit motions, Nov. 2025 · court
  9. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Parties' Joint Submission on Proposed Plaintiff Fact Sheet, Dkt. 762 (July 21, 2026)MDL 3125 proposed plaintiff fact sheet · court
  10. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Order Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Compel, Setting Status Conference, and Governing Discovery Responses, Dkt. 824 (Sept. 22, 2026)MDL 3125 order of Sept. 22, 2026 · court
  11. S.D. Cal., MDL 3125, Case Management Order No. 8 Governing Discovery Process Relating to Plaintiff Profile Forms, Dkt. 573 (Jan. 16, 2026)MDL 3125 Case Management Order 8 · court
  12. CourtListener docket, In re AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc., Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, No. 3:24-md-03125 (S.D. Cal.)MDL 3125 docket (CourtListener) · court
  13. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, MDL 3125, Dkt. 194-1 (Feb. 20, 2025)AngioDynamics' motion to dismiss brief · court
  14. FDA Medical Device Recall database: Class 2 Device Recall Vortex MP Port (Z-0132-2023)FDA recall: Vortex MP Port (2022) · regulator
  15. FDA Medical Device Recall database: Class 2 Device Recall Smart Port CT (Z-1466-2021)FDA recall: Smart Port CT (2021) · regulator
  16. FDA Medical Device Recall database: Class 2 Device Recall BioFlo Port with ENDEXO and PASV Technology (Z-0076-2019)FDA recall: BioFlo Port (2018) · regulator
  17. openFDA device recall records for recalling firms AngioDynamics and Navilyst (all 410 product records, queried Oct. 5, 2026)openFDA recall records · regulator
  18. FDA: About Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE)FDA: About MAUDE · regulator
  19. openFDA device adverse event (MAUDE) records for AngioDynamics or Navilyst, product code LJT (implanted port), counted by brand name (queried Oct. 5, 2026)openFDA adverse event records · regulator
  20. National Cancer Institute, NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms: portNCI Dictionary: port · regulator
  21. Braun U, et al. Mechanic and surface properties of central-venous port catheters after removal: A comparison of polyurethane and silicon rubber materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;64:281-91Braun et al., 2016 · study
  22. Wildgruber M, et al. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm. Eur J Cancer. 2016;59:113-124Wildgruber et al., 2016 · study
  23. Surov A, et al. Port catheter insufficiency: incidence and clinical-radiological correlations. Onkologie. 2008;31(8-9):455-61Surov et al., 2008 · study
  24. Goossens GA, et al. Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(7):883-98Goossens et al., 2011 · study
  25. ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5: FeesABA Model Rule 1.5
  26. HHS: Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
  27. S.D.N.Y. Pro Se FAQ: How long do I have to file my complaint (statute of limitations)?SDNY: filing time limits · court
  28. MedlinePlus: Central venous catheters - ports
  29. Surov et al., JPEN, 2009
  30. Murray et al., British Journal of Haematology, 2013
  31. Mirza et al., American Surgeon, 2004Mirza et al., American Surgeon, 2004 · study
  32. Xiang et al., Medicine, 2025Xiang et al., Medicine, 2025 · study
  33. Lebeaux et al., Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2014Lebeaux et al., Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2014 · study
  34. HHS: Your right to access your health informationHHS: Your right to access your health information · regulator
  35. eCFR: 45 CFR 164.524 (access to health information)eCFR: 45 CFR 164.524 (access to health information) · regulator
  36. FDA: MedWatch forms for safety reportingFDA: MedWatch forms for safety reporting · regulator

Checked against 36 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 5, 2026