Does this rule apply to my claim?
It may not apply the same way to everyone. Both Supreme Court cases were about claims under federal law, and AirTag claims are mostly based on state law. It also matters whether you were in a group Hughes proposed.
The 1974 case involved federal antitrust claims, and the 1983 case involved a federal job discrimination claim. In Hughes, the judge used California law for many claims. He ended one type of product claim for some people without iPhones from eight states, because those states’ laws are different.
In 2024, the judge said the groups proposed in Hughes included people across the U.S. said to be at risk of AirTag stalking. The groups may have changed later. Whether you fit a proposed group, and how your state treats a pause from a federal class case, are questions for an attorney.