Case guide

AB 250 Cover-Up Rule: What Counts and How Courts Read It

Under this law, a cover-up is a joint effort to hide evidence of an assault or keep people quiet. The court rulings we found read the 2022 version.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Did this situation involve abuse or assault? *

Updated Oct 5, 202615 sources

This may apply to you if

  • You were sexually assaulted when you were 18 or older.
  • Your claim was past California's normal time limit before January 1, 2026.
  • You say a private company or group is legally responsible and hid, or tried to hide, earlier sexual assaults or reports of assault.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

California Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two · California Court of Appeal · Appeals court deciding Jane Doe #21 (S.H.) v. CFR Enterprises, Inc. (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 1199

Finding: Reading the 2022 version of the law, the court said each plaintiff must allege a cover-up by her own defendant that predated her assault, and that the earlier assault need not be by the same person.

Jane Doe #21 (S.H.) v. CFR Enterprises, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist., Div. 2, 2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 1199, No. A163543 (opens in a new tab) · Jun 29, 2023 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · Federal trial court deciding Dutrisac v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., No. 23-cv-06639-BLF

Finding: Reading the 2022 version of the law, the court said a “concerted effort” requires two or more people and that a dismissive reaction and firing after the assault could not be the cover-up; it allowed an amended complaint.

Dutrisac v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., No. 23-cv-06639-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2024), order on motions to dismiss (opens in a new tab) · Aug 2, 2024 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The short answer

What must a claim against a company say?
It must say you were sexually assaulted and that someone is to blame under the law. It must also say the company, or its bosses, workers or agents, hid or tried to hide an earlier assault or report. A lawyer writes this in the court papers. [1]
Does the cover-up have to come before my assault?
Two courts reading the 2022 law said it does. In 2023, a California appeals court said each person must claim the company’s cover-up came before her own assault. A federal court in 2024 said steps taken after the assault did not count. [6]
Can one manager acting alone be a cover-up?
Maybe not, under one federal ruling. In 2024, a federal court in San Jose said the law’s words “concerted effort” mean two or more people working together. The law also counts what a company’s bosses, workers and agents did. So a lawyer will look at who took part. [13]
Can a secrecy agreement be part of a cover-up?
It can. The law names secrecy deals, such as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements, as examples. In the 2024 federal case, the court noted the woman did not claim any such deal. [1]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This page does not decide whether your facts show a cover-up. A lawyer has to review them.
  • The court readings here are about the 2022 version of the law. We found no court opinion on the 2025 version as of October 5, 2026.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Under this law, a cover-up is a joint effort to hide evidence of an assault or keep people quiet. The court rulings we found read the 2022 version. A lawyer can check your facts.

What must a claim against a company say?

It must say you were sexually assaulted and that someone is to blame under the law. It must also say the company, or its bosses, workers or agents, hid or tried to hide an earlier assault or report. A lawyer writes this in the court papers.

Our main guide explains the law’s full definition of a cover-up. This page looks at how courts have applied it.

The law reaches many legal theories against a company, such as carelessness, harm done on purpose, or responsibility for what its workers did.

Not being able to show a cover-up by one company does not stop your claims against others, including the person who assaulted you, from being reopened.

Does the cover-up have to come before my assault?

Two courts reading the 2022 law said it does. In 2023, a California appeals court said each person must claim the company’s cover-up came before her own assault. A federal court in 2024 said steps taken after the assault did not count.

The 2023 case was brought by several dozen women against Massage Envy’s franchisor and some of its franchise owners. They said massage therapists had assaulted them as adults.

The appeals court said the women had not shown how each one claimed a cover-up by her own defendant, before her own assault. It still sent the cases back to the trial court and said the law revived some, if not all, of the claims.

In the 2024 federal case, an engineer said she reported the assaults to the head of human resources, who reacted dismissively, and that she was later fired. The court said those steps came after the assault, so they could not be the cover-up the law requires.

Can one manager acting alone be a cover-up?

Maybe not, under one federal ruling. In 2024, a federal court in San Jose said the law’s words “concerted effort” mean two or more people working together. The law also counts what a company’s bosses, workers and agents did. So a lawyer will look at who took part.

That ruling decided only that one case. Other courts may read the words differently, and it was about the 2022 wording, which used the same key words.

The 2023 appeals court gave the trial court some guidance too. It said nothing in the law requires the earlier assault to be by the same person who later assaulted the woman suing.

Can a secrecy agreement be part of a cover-up?

It can. The law names secrecy deals, such as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements, as examples. In the 2024 federal case, the court noted the woman did not claim any such deal.

Timing still matters. The 2023 appeals court, reading the 2022 law, said the cover-up had to come before each woman’s assault. So the date of any agreement may matter.

Lawmakers’ analysis of AB 250 quotes its supporters describing a workplace that used nondisclosure agreements to protect abusive behavior. That analysis explains the bill; it is not the law itself.

If you signed an agreement, keep a copy and show it to a lawyer. Our records page explains how to ask an employer for papers you signed to get or keep a job.

What kinds of facts did the courts say were missing?

Facts about earlier assaults or reports, and what the company did to hide them. In the 2024 case, the court said the woman pointed only to facts about her own assaults. It let her try again with facts showing a cover-up that came first.

In the 2023 case, the problem was showing the cover-up for each woman and each company. The court said the women had to tie the cover-up to the company each one says is responsible.

Being allowed to try again does not decide who is right. It means the court wanted more facts.

What happens when I check?

A lawyer will likely ask what the company knew before your assault, who knew it and what they did. You can share what you feel ready to share. Ask for any fee deal in writing, and read it before you sign.

In California, a fee based on a share of the money must be in a written contract signed by you and the lawyer. It must state the rate. In most cases it must also say the fee can be negotiated.

You do not have to go through this alone. RAINN’s National Sexual Assault Hotline is free, confidential and open 24/7. Call 800-656-4673, text HOPE to 64673 or chat at RAINN.org/hotline.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.16 (current text, as amended by Stats. 2025, ch. 682, AB 250, effective Jan. 1, 2026)Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.16 · regulator
  2. Assembly Bill No. 250 (2025-2026 Reg. Sess.), Chapter 682, Statutes of 2025: chaptered bill text and Legislative Counsel’s DigestAB 250 chaptered text · regulator
  3. AB 250 (2025-2026) bill history, California Legislative InformationAB 250 bill history · regulator
  4. Assembly Floor Analysis, Concurrence in Senate Amendments, AB 250 (Aguiar-Curry), as amended Sept. 5, 2025 (dated 09/10/25)Assembly floor analysis, Sept. 2025 · regulator
  5. Assembly Bill No. 2777 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.), Chapter 442, Statutes of 2022: chaptered bill textAB 2777 chaptered text (2022) · regulator
  6. Jane Doe #21 (S.H.) v. CFR Enterprises, Inc. (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 1199, Cal. Ct. App., First Dist., Div. Two, No. A163543 (filed June 29, 2023; certified for publication July 27, 2023)Jane Doe #21 v. CFR Enterprises (2023) · court
  7. Dutrisac v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., No. 5:23-cv-06639-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2024), Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss with Leave to AmendDutrisac v. STMicroelectronics (N.D. Cal. 2024) · court
  8. California Government Code § 811.2 (definition of "public entity", Government Claims Act)Cal. Gov. Code § 811.2 · regulator
  9. California Business and Professions Code § 6147 (contingency fee contracts)Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6147 · regulator
  10. California Labor Code § 1198.5 (employee personnel records)Cal. Labor Code § 1198.5 · regulator
  11. HHS: Individuals’ Right under HIPAA to Access their Health Information / Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
  12. RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network): homepage, National Sexual Assault HotlineRAINN
  13. Dutrisac v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., No. 23-cv-06639-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2024), order on motions to dismiss
  14. People's Justice editors' CourtListener case-law search record for rulings on AB 250 (searches run Oct. 5, 2026)People's Justice editors' CourtListener case-law search record for rulings on AB 250 (searches run Oct. 5, 2026)
  15. California Labor Code § 432 (copy of signed employment documents)California Labor Code § 432 (copy of signed employment documents) · regulator

Checked against 14 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 5, 2026