Case guide

Was Your Cartiva Implant Taken Out? The Records to Ask For

If your Cartiva implant was replaced or taken out, your surgery and scan records can show what happened. Here is what to ask for and how to get copies.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Was there an injury related to this incident? *

Updated Oct 5, 202635 sources

This may apply to you if

  • You had a Cartiva implant put in the joint at the base of your big toe.
  • You later had problems such as lasting pain, less movement, or a sunken or loose implant.
  • You needed, or may need, more surgery, such as removing the implant or fusing the joint.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Kristine G. Baker · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas · Chief U.S. District Judge presiding over MDL 3172

Finding: The Initial Management Order of August 31, 2026 listed explant preservation first among open issues, asked for updated position statements by October 1, 2026, and set a telephone status hearing for October 8, 2026.

E.D. Ark., MDL 3172 Initial Management Order (Aug. 31, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Aug 31, 2026 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

A. Chopra · Georgetown University School of Medicine · First author of a single-surgeon study of revision after Cartiva surgery

Finding: In 219 Cartiva procedures by one surgeon, 8.2% of first implants were revised; converting to fusion relieved pain more than putting in a new implant.

Chopra et al., Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2024 (opens in a new tab) · Feb 2, 2023 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Georgetown University School of Medicine (first author) · Foot & Ankle Specialist · 2024

Revision Surgery After Failed Index Synthetic Cartilage Implant Resurfacing for Hallux Rigidus

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
A look back at 219 Cartiva procedures by one surgeon (case series); 23 revisions.
Finding:
8.2% of first implants were revised, about a year later on average; fusion relieved pain more than a new implant.
Main limitation
One surgeon’s patients, looked at after the fact, with short follow-up; it cannot give a rate for all patients or explain any one person’s result.

Read the source: Revision Surgery After Failed Index Synthetic Cartilage Implant Resurfacing for Hallux Rigidus (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Foot & Ankle International · 2020

Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Symptomatic Synthetic Cartilage Implant

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
A look back at 18 painful implants in 16 patients who had MRI (case series).
Finding:
MRI showed implants smaller than their bone channel and fluid around the implant in 14 of 18; 6 of 16 patients had revision surgery.
Main limitation
A small series of patients who already had pain, with no comparison group; it cannot show how often this happens.

Read the source: Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Symptomatic Synthetic Cartilage Implant (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine · Foot & Ankle Specialist · 2022

Adverse Events Related to Cartiva Hemiarthroplasty of First Metatarsal: An Analysis of Reports to the FDA

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
A review of 49 reports to FDA’s MAUDE database, July 2016 to October 2019.
Finding:
Implant sinking (16 reports) was the most common named problem, then breaking apart (9); 35 reports mentioned more surgery.
Main limitation
Voluntary reports with no count of all implants, so they cannot give a true complication rate.

Read the source: Adverse Events Related to Cartiva Hemiarthroplasty of First Metatarsal: An Analysis of Reports to the FDA (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

Hannover Medical School · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · 2024

Synthetic cartilage implant vs. first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for the treatment of hallux rigidus

Design:
Case-control
Participants:
18 Cartiva patients matched with 18 fusion patients, followed about 1.5 years.
Finding:
X-rays of the implant group often showed a wider implant hole or bone wear; fusion patients had less pain when active.
Main limitation
Small, looked back after the fact, with short follow-up; it cannot predict any one person’s result.

Read the source: Synthetic cartilage implant vs. first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for the treatment of hallux rigidus (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

Duke University Hospital · Foot and Ankle Clinics · 2024

Surgical Management of Failed First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
A review of past research; no new patient group.
Finding:
A failed big-toe implant often leaves large bone gaps; fusion usually relieves pain, but complications and non-healing are common, and bone graft may be needed.
Main limitation
A narrative review of all big-toe implant types, not Cartiva only; authors list device-company ties.

Read the source: Surgical Management of Failed First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The short answer

What surgery follows a failed Cartiva implant?
A surgeon may put in a new implant, or take the implant out and fuse the joint so the bones heal as one. In one surgeon’s 219 Cartiva surgeries, 8.2% of first implants needed another operation. That came about a year later on average. [24]
What can X-ray and MRI reports show?
Studies of painful Cartiva implants describe what scans may show. The hole around the implant may grow wider, and the bone may wear away. Fluid around the implant may mean it is loose. Ask your doctor what your own scan report means. [25]
Which papers show what happened to my Cartiva implant?
Ask for the surgeon’s notes from each operation, the implant sticker, and your X-rays, MRI and their reports. If tissue or the implant was sent to a lab, ask for that report too. Your right to copies covers X-rays and other images. [26]
How fast must a provider send my records, and can I fix a mistake?
A provider must act on your request within 30 days. It may take up to 30 more days once, if it tells you why in writing. You can ask for the format you want, such as an email copy. [27]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This page does not say whether you need more surgery. Only your surgeon can help you decide that.
  • It does not judge whether the implant caused your problem.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

What surgery follows a failed Cartiva implant?

A surgeon may put in a new implant, or take the implant out and fuse the joint so the bones heal as one. In one surgeon’s 219 Cartiva surgeries, 8.2% of first implants needed another operation. That came about a year later on average.

Of the 23 repeat operations in that study, 11 were fusions and 12 used a new implant. Some new implants needed bone graft or a custom base to stop sinking. Fusion eased pain more than a new implant did.

A failed big-toe implant often leaves a large gap in the bone, which can make the next surgery harder. Bone graft may be needed to fill it. A first-time fusion does not usually need graft.

Talk to your surgeon before you make any choice about your implant.

What can X-ray and MRI reports show?

Studies of painful Cartiva implants describe what scans may show. The hole around the implant may grow wider, and the bone may wear away. Fluid around the implant may mean it is loose. Ask your doctor what your own scan report means.

In a Cedars-Sinai study of 18 painful implants, MRI showed the implant was smaller than the hole it sat in. Fluid around the implant was seen in 14 of them. Six of the 16 patients went on to have another surgery.

A German study compared 18 implant patients with 18 fusion patients. X-rays of the implant group often showed a wider implant hole or worn bone. Fusion patients had less pain when active.

These studies are small and describe groups of patients. They cannot tell you why your own implant failed.

Which papers show what happened to my Cartiva implant?

Ask for the surgeon’s notes from each operation, the implant sticker, and your X-rays, MRI and their reports. If tissue or the implant was sent to a lab, ask for that report too. Your right to copies covers X-rays and other images.

The surgery notes from the later operation should say what was found and what was done. They may say whether bone graft was used. In one study of big-toe fusions, researchers found graft use by reading surgery notes and X-rays.

Most device labels carry a device code, which the recall list uses for each size. Also write down the dates of each surgery and when you were told the implant had failed.

How fast must a provider send my records, and can I fix a mistake?

A provider must act on your request within 30 days. It may take up to 30 more days once, if it tells you why in writing. You can ask for the format you want, such as an email copy.

If something in your record is wrong, you can ask the provider to correct it. It must act within 60 days, with one more 30-day extension allowed. It can say no if it decides the record is already accurate and complete.

What happens to a Cartiva implant after it is taken out?

We found no court order yet on how removed implants must be kept. It is the first of six issues the judge asked both sides to work on. A status hearing by phone is set for October 8, 2026.

The two sides had to send the judge updated views on this by October 1, 2026. We could not read those papers, and we found no order on it as of October 5. If your surgery is already planned, ask your surgeon what will happen to the implant.

FDA’s 2016 approval required a follow-up study of the first trial’s patients. One goal was to check wear on any study implant that was removed. FDA says a problem report alone does not show the device caused the problem, and cause is even harder to show if no one examined the device.

You can report a problem with your implant to FDA through MedWatch. Your doctor does not have to do it for you. Patients can use a simpler form, called Form FDA 3500B.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. JPML Transfer Order, In re Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3172, Doc. 27 (Feb. 5, 2026)JPML transfer order, MDL 3172 · court
  2. JPML, MDL Statistics Report: Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending (Oct. 1, 2026)JPML pending report, Oct. 1, 2026 (by actions) · court
  3. JPML, MDL Statistics Report: Docket Summary Listing by MDL Number (Oct. 1, 2026)JPML pending report, Oct. 1, 2026 (by MDL number) · court
  4. In re Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Products Liability Litigation, No. 4:26-md-03172-KGB (E.D. Ark.), Initial Management Order, Dkt. 24 (Aug. 31, 2026)Initial management order, Aug. 31, 2026 · court
  5. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas: Multidistrict Litigation 3172 (In re Cartiva) pageE.D. Ark. MDL 3172 page · court
  6. CourtListener docket: In re Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Products Liability Litigation, 4:26-md-03172 (E.D. Ark.)CourtListener docket, MDL 3172 · court
  7. FDA Premarket Approval database: Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant, P150017FDA PMA record P150017 · regulator
  8. FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant, PMA P150017FDA safety and effectiveness summary · regulator
  9. FDA Medical Device Recall database: Class 2 Device Recall Cartiva, Z-0598-2025FDA recall Z-0598-2025 · regulator
  10. FDA: What is a medical device recall?FDA: What is a medical device recall? · regulator
  11. FDA: Premarket Approval (PMA)FDA: Premarket approval · regulator
  12. FDA: Unique Device Identification System (UDI System)FDA: Unique device identifiers · regulator
  13. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)Riegel v. Medtronic (2008) · regulator
  14. Stryker news release: Stryker completes acquisition of Wright Medical (Nov. 11, 2020)Stryker news release, Nov. 2020
  15. Butler JJ et al. Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus is associated with a high complication rate and moderate failure rate at short-term follow-up: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(4):1765-1778Butler et al., 2024 · study
  16. Jeremic A, Abussa R. Cartiva or fusion for Hallux Rigidus? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2026;65(4):138.e1-138.e6Jeremic and Abussa, 2026 · study
  17. Glazebrook H et al. Failures of Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant for Hallux Rigidus and Outcomes of Revision to Arthrodesis: Mid-Term to Long-Term Results. Foot Ankle Spec. 2025Glazebrook et al., 2025 · study
  18. Cassinelli SJ et al. Early Outcomes and Complications of Synthetic Cartilage Implant for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(10):1140-1148Cassinelli et al., 2019 · study
  19. Shimozono Y, Hurley ET, Kennedy JG. Early Failures of Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(3):340-346Shimozono et al., 2021 · study
  20. 28 U.S.C. § 1407: Multidistrict litigation (Cornell LII)28 U.S.C. § 1407
  21. ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5: FeesABA Model Rule 1.5
  22. S.D.N.Y. Pro Se FAQ: How long do I have to file my complaint (statute of limitations)?SDNY: filing time limits · court
  23. HHS: Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
  24. Chopra et al., Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2024
  25. An et al., Foot & Ankle International, 2020
  26. HHS: Your right to access your health information
  27. eCFR: 45 CFR 164.524 (access to health information)
  28. FDA: About the MAUDE databaseFDA: About the MAUDE database · regulator
  29. Anastasio et al., Foot and Ankle Clinics, 2024Anastasio et al., Foot and Ankle Clinics, 2024 · study
  30. Tran et al., Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 2025Tran et al., Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 2025 · study
  31. Budde et al., Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2024Budde et al., Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2024 · study
  32. eCFR: 45 CFR 164.526 (changes to health records)eCFR: 45 CFR 164.526 (changes to health records) · regulator
  33. FDA approval order, Cartiva implant P150017 (July 1, 2016)FDA approval order, Cartiva implant P150017 (July 1, 2016) · court
  34. FDA: Reporting serious problems to FDA (MedWatch)FDA: Reporting serious problems to FDA (MedWatch) · regulator
  35. Metikala et al., Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2022Metikala et al., Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2022 · study

Checked against 33 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 5, 2026