Who qualifies

UPDATED FEB 2026

Part of the Construction Accident investigation
People's Justice Research TeamUpdated February 21, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

Free · Confidential · About 2 minutes · A case specialist responds within 1 business day

Your answers are never sold or shared without your consent.

Workers' compensation bars you from suing your direct employer, but it does not protect any other party whose negligence contributed to your construction accident. On a typical construction site, the list of potential third-party defendants is substantial, and identifying each party's specific liability theory is the foundation of a successful construction accident civil lawsuit.

General Contractor — Primary Site Safety Responsibility

The general contractor is responsible for overall construction site safety, coordination of all subcontractors, and OSHA compliance at the project level. GC liability for worker injuries sustained by subcontractor employees is well-established in most states — the GC's control over the work site creates an independent duty of care. OSHA's multi-employer citation policy allows OSHA to cite the GC for violations committed by subcontractors if the GC had the ability to correct or prevent them. This same principle supports civil negligence claims against the GC in worker injury lawsuits.

Property Owner — Premises Liability and NY Labor Law §240

The property owner has an independent duty to maintain safe premises and can be liable for construction accidents even when they have hired a GC to manage daily operations. In New York, Labor Law §240 imposes absolute liability on the property owner for gravity-related accidents — the owner cannot escape liability by pointing to the GC's management of safety. Outside New York, property owner liability depends on the level of control the owner retained over the work, the owner's knowledge of hazardous conditions, and applicable premises liability law.

Equipment Manufacturers — Strict Products Liability

If a defective product — a crane component, a scaffold bracket, a power tool, a safety harness — caused or contributed to your injury, the manufacturer is strictly liable under products liability law. You do not need to prove the manufacturer was negligent — only that the product was defectively designed or manufactured and that the defect caused your injury. Product defect claims can be combined with negligence claims against the GC and property owner, multiplying the available insurance coverage and recovery potential.

Other Third-Party Defendants

Additional defendants in construction accident cases can include: scaffolding rental companies (products liability and negligence for defective or improperly assembled scaffold systems), other subcontractors (negligence for creating hazards in their work areas), architects and engineers (professional negligence for design defects or inadequate safety specifications), material suppliers (defective building materials), crane inspection companies (negligence for failing to identify defects before a crane collapse), and utility companies (for failure to de-energize overhead lines during construction). Each additional defendant adds insurance coverage and settlement leverage.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Yes — in most cases. Workers' compensation provides an 'exclusive remedy' against your direct employer, which means you generally cannot sue your employer in a civil lawsuit. However, the exclusive remedy doctrine does not protect third parties who are not your direct employer. On a construction site, many parties are present beyond your employer: the general contractor overseeing the project, other subcontractors, the property owner, equipment manufacturers, scaffolding rental companies, and material suppliers. If any of these third parties' negligence contributed to your accident, you can pursue a civil lawsuit against them while simultaneously receiving workers' comp benefits. The workers' comp carrier may assert a lien against your civil lawsuit recovery for benefits paid, but lien resolution negotiations typically allow you to keep the substantial majority of your civil recovery. The dual-track strategy — workers' comp for immediate income replacement plus a civil lawsuit for full damages including pain and suffering — almost always produces a higher total recovery than either track alone.

The full investigation

Part of the Construction Accident Investigation