People's Justice

Who qualifies

Uber assault claims: questions and records

An Uber assault claim needs its own facts and deadline check. Court coordination does not decide whether your claim succeeds.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202615 sources

This may apply to you if

  • The harm you want reviewed was linked to an Uber or Lyft ride.
  • Tell the lawyer which app you used and where and when the ride took place.
  • Ask a lawyer to check the facts before treating a court group as proof that you qualify.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Lisa J. Cisneros · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · United States Magistrate Judge

Finding: The July 30, 2026 Uber order allowed limited evidence gathering about driver background checks. It did not decide whether a new person has a claim.

Uber order on lobbying and background checks (opens in a new tab) · Jul 30, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Charles R. Breyer · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · United States District Judge

Finding: The February 4, 2026 order required access to admitted exhibits after jury deliberations ended in the Dean test trial. That order concerns one Uber trial, not every survivor’s privacy.

Dean trial exhibit access order (opens in a new tab) · Feb 4, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Uber · 2024

Uber’s report of serious safety incidents

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
Reports from riders and drivers in 2021 and 2022; not a study of enrolled patients.
Finding:
Uber’s company report includes sexual assault reports from riders and drivers on its US platform.
Main limitation
Uber says it does not decide whether reported events occurred. These company data do not prove fault in your claim or describe Lyft’s platform.

Read the source: Uber’s report of serious safety incidents (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Who may have an Uber assault claim?
The Uber cases concern claims that safety failures led to assault or harassment. The court has not decided your claim. Ask a lawyer to check the ride, place and harm you want reviewed. [1]
What is not covered by the transfer order?
The order groups cases for work before trial. It does not award you money or approve your claim. A Lyft ride needs a separate check. [1]
What if my situation is unusual?
Rides, places, witnesses and care records differ. Ask how your facts affect the claim. Another person’s trial does not decide yours. [1]
What records should I gather?
Start with the ride records and messages you have. A civil case can involve requests for documents and witness details. Ask how to save your copies and seek missing files. [14]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This page does not decide a personal claim, diagnosis, filing deadline or payment.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

The criteria attorneys check

  1. 01

    The harm you want reviewed was linked to an Uber or Lyft ride.

  2. 02

    Tell the lawyer which app you used and where and when the ride took place.

  3. 03

    Ask a lawyer to check the facts before treating a court group as proof that you qualify.

Who may have an Uber assault claim?

The Uber cases concern claims that safety failures led to assault or harassment. The court has not decided your claim. Ask a lawyer to check the ride, place and harm you want reviewed.

Start with the ride you mean, rather than a general account of every trip you have taken. If you have an existing case, give the lawyer its number and the name of the firm handling it. Ask whether this would be a new claim or advice about that case.

What is not covered by the transfer order?

The order groups cases for work before trial. It does not award you money or approve your claim. A Lyft ride needs a separate check.

Ask the lawyer to identify the company and proposed claim in plain words. If several services were involved, list them separately and explain which part you are sure about. Leave uncertain details marked as uncertain.

What if my situation is unusual?

Rides, places, witnesses and care records differ. Ask how your facts affect the claim. Another person’s trial does not decide yours.

Tell the lawyer if someone already contacted a company, filed a report or signed an agreement for this event. Ask what that changes before signing another form. Request a written explanation of anything you do not understand.

What records should I gather?

Start with the ride records and messages you have. A civil case can involve requests for documents and witness details. Ask how to save your copies and seek missing files.

Make a short list of what you have and where it came from. Ask before giving anyone access to an entire device or account. You can describe a missing receipt without making up its contents.

What deadline should I ask about for an Uber claim?

Give the lawyer your Uber ride date and place. The grouping order does not set your time to file.

What happens after I ask about an Uber claim?

Ask which firm would handle the ride claim and what it needs. Check fees, costs and your current lawyer before you agree.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. Pages 1–2, document 213 filed April 2, 2026Uber case scope · court
  2. MDL table rows 3171 and 3084Court lists separate Uber and Lyft groups · court
  3. Uber MDL subsectionUber test trial exhibits · court
  4. July 30, 2026 order, pages 3–6Uber court work and new claims · court
  5. Third US Safety Report explanation; 2021–2022 dataUber safety report scope
  6. Contact Us: National Sexual Assault HotlineRAINN support contact
  7. Where to find medical care: medical support and exam sectionsRAINN medical help
  8. Model Rule 1.5(b)–(c)Fee agreement questions
  9. February 4, 2026 order, document 5196, page 1Public trial exhibits · court
  10. October 1, 2026 report; row 3084Uber pending count · court
  11. Calling 911: emergency assistanceEmergency help · regulator
  12. Uber MDL bellwether in Charlotte, NC: federal jury found the driver committed battery (not sexual assault) for grabbing a passenger's inner thigh and awarded $5,000; Judge Charles Breyer had ruled Uber qualifies as a 'common carrier' under North Carolina law with heightened liability for driver misconduct — Uber vowed to appeal. (Fortune also reports an intervening California bellwether where Uber was found not liable.)fortune.com · Apr 20, 2026
  13. First bellwether trial in Uber passenger sexual assault MDL-3084: an Arizona federal jury awarded plaintiff Jaylynn Dean $8.5 million, finding her driver was an 'apparent agent' of Uber, while rejecting negligence and defective-safety-system claims (plaintiffs had sought $144M); Uber said it would appeal.fortune.com · Feb 6, 2026
  14. U.S. Courts civil-case guide
  15. SDNY court guide: filing time limits

Checked against 11 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026