U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Summary of the claims (MDL No. 3172), not a ruling
“Plaintiffs allege that their Cartiva SCI was defective, that they experienced persistent pain and limited range of motion following implantation, and that they required additional surgery to remove their failed implant and fuse the arthritic joint.”
JPML transfer order, Cartiva MDL No. 3172 (Feb. 5, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Feb 5, 2026 · Checked Oct 6, 2026