How a Broken Paragard IUD Causes Infertility
Paragard IUD infertility lawsuits involve women who chose a copper IUD specifically because they wanted a hormone-free contraceptive option while preserving future fertility — and who then lost that fertility because the device broke during removal. Infertility from Paragard breakage occurs through several pathways. Hysterectomy — the surgical removal of the uterus — is the most direct and devastating cause: when Paragard removal complications cannot be managed conservatively, surgeons may be forced to perform a hysterectomy, permanently eliminating the possibility of pregnancy. Fallopian tube damage from a migrated fragment can cause tubal occlusion — a form of tubal factor infertility. Intrauterine scarring (Asherman's syndrome) from chronic copper exposure and surgical trauma can prevent embryo implantation. Each of these pathways has been documented in Paragard litigation cases and supported by reproductive medicine expert testimony.
Why Infertility Claims Are the Highest-Value Paragard Cases
Infertility damages in Paragard litigation are significant for several reasons. Plaintiffs who chose Paragard specifically to preserve future fertility — and then lost that fertility due to device failure — present a compelling narrative of betrayal by a product they trusted. Non-economic damages for loss of reproductive capacity are substantial and jury-sympathetic, particularly for younger plaintiffs. Economic damages include the cost of fertility treatments attempted before the diagnosis of infertility was confirmed (IVF, fertility evaluations, reproductive endocrinology consultations), the cost of gestational surrogacy or adoption, and the psychological treatment costs for fertility grief. Expert testimony from reproductive endocrinologists and OB/GYN specialists is available to document the causal link from device fracture to infertility and to quantify both the medical and non-medical costs of reproductive loss. Settlement projections for Paragard infertility cases range from $100,000 to $380,000, with outlier jury verdicts reaching higher.
Evidence Needed for a Paragard Infertility Claim
Strong Paragard infertility cases require documentation of the full causal chain: medical records showing the Paragard was implanted and removed (with notation of arm breakage); imaging or surgical records confirming the device fracture and retained fragment; operative reports from any surgery performed to retrieve the fragment; reproductive medicine records documenting infertility diagnosis (HSG, hysteroscopy, semen analysis if applicable) and any fertility treatments attempted; and, for hysterectomy cases, the operative report and pathology confirming hysterectomy as the treatment for Paragard complications. Statements or records reflecting the plaintiff's prior intent to have children — prenatal consultations, documented family planning discussions, prior fertility evaluations — strengthen the non-economic damages narrative. Reproductive medicine expert testimony is typically required to connect the device fracture to the specific infertility mechanism.
The Emotional Dimensions of Paragard Infertility Damages
Beyond the medical and economic damages, Paragard infertility cases involve profound emotional harm that courts and juries recognize as significant non-economic damages. Women who were told by their healthcare providers that Paragard was a safe, reversible contraceptive option and who then experienced permanent, irreversible loss of fertility describe a traumatic experience of betrayal, grief, and loss of life plans that no medical intervention can fully address. Psychological diagnoses including major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, and complicated grief from fertility loss are documented in medical records and supported by psychiatric expert testimony. The contrast between the expected experience — a routine IUD removal followed by the possibility of natural conception — and the actual experience — major surgery and permanent infertility — is precisely the kind of narrative that resonates with juries and drives high verdict values. Paragard infertility cases deserve the most thorough and aggressive legal representation available.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Pages
Paragard IUD Lawsuit Update 2026
2026 is a pivotal year for Paragard MDL 2974 — the first bellwether trial ended in a Teva defense verdict on February 5, two more trials follow in March and May, and global settlement negotiations are active as both sides assess litigation risk
Learn moreParagard IUD Broken During Removal Lawsuit
Device arm fracture during removal is the central defect in Paragard litigation — when the T-frame's arms snap off inside the uterus, what was a routine office procedure becomes a surgical emergency requiring hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or in severe cases, hysterectomy
Learn moreParagard IUD Copper Toxicity Lawsuit
Retained copper fragments from a broken Paragard IUD can cause chronic copper exposure, inflammation, and systemic copper toxicity symptoms — an underreported injury type distinct from the mechanical fracture injuries at the center of most MDL 2974 claims
Learn moreParagard IUD Organ Perforation Lawsuit
Paragard fragments that migrate beyond the uterine cavity can perforate the bowel, bladder, fallopian tubes, and other abdominal organs — requiring major surgery and carrying permanent health consequences that significantly elevate damages in litigation
Learn moreParagard IUD Removal Complications
Paragard removal complications — from arm fracture to organ migration to emergency surgery — represent a spectrum of outcomes from a device marketed as easily and safely removable, and each level of complication may support a product liability claim against Teva
Learn moreParagard IUD Lawsuit Settlement Amounts 2026
Paragard IUD settlement amounts range from $10,000 to $380,000 depending on injury severity — with the Teva defense verdict in February 2026 creating uncertainty while two more bellwether trials in 2026 will further define the litigation's value
Learn moreParagard IUD Statute of Limitations by State
A 2025 MDL ruling established that Paragard statutes of limitations run from the date of device breakage — not symptom onset — making immediate action critical for women whose Paragard broke in 2022, 2023, or 2024
Learn moreTeva Defense Verdict — What It Means for Paragard Cases
On February 5, 2026, Teva won the first Paragard bellwether trial — but one defense verdict in one case does not end the MDL, and women with documented infertility, surgery, and strong imaging evidence still have viable claims
Learn moreWho Qualifies for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit?
You may qualify for a Paragard IUD lawsuit if your device broke during removal and you suffered a documented injury — surgery, organ damage, or infertility — with medical records to support the claim and your state's statute of limitations still open
Learn moreParagard IUD Lawsuit Lawsuit
Paragard (T380A copper IUD) was FDA-approved in 1984 and has been used by millions of American women as a hormone-free long-term contraceptive. Women and their doctors began reporting a troubling pattern: when Paragard is removed — a routine office procedure — the device's copper-and-plastic arms snap off inside the patient. The retained fragments can migrate, perforate organs, cause chronic pelvic pain, and require invasive surgery including hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and in some cases hysterectomy to remove. Women who suffered uterine perforation, organ damage, or infertility from a broken Paragard may have a product liability claim against Teva Pharmaceuticals. The MDL is pending before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia. The first bellwether trial (Rickard v. Teva) ended in a defense verdict on February 5, 2026. Two additional bellwether trials are scheduled in March and May 2026. Settlement negotiations are active. Claimants who can document breakage, surgery, and significant injury — especially infertility — have the strongest cases.
View full case overview