Case updates

A Teva verdict report: which record should I check?

A Teva verdict report needs the original court record. The order here concerns time limits, not a jury’s decision.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 7, 202610 sources

This may apply to you if

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • Describe the device, removal and harm you want checked.
  • Prepare the procedure note and later care records if available.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Leigh Martin May · United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · United States district judge signing the cited order

Finding: The February 11, 2025 order resolved some limitations/repose issues and deferred others for specified claims. It is not a single national cutoff.

May: Paragard Doc868 time-limit order (opens in a new tab) · Feb 11, 2025 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What should I read behind a Teva verdict report?
Ask for the actual jury result and later court orders. Document 868 deals with time defenses, not a jury decision. A lawyer can explain what the full record means for your case. [6]
What changed in the dated order, and what does it mean?
A motion ruling deals with the issue brought to the judge. A jury trial decides the questions put to the jury. Check which kind of record the report describes. [9]
What are the key dates behind the report?
Teva reported that the first federal test trial ended on February 3, 2026, with a verdict in its favor. As of October 6, 2026, ask a lawyer to check the judgment and any later orders for your claim. [7]
How complete is the dated log for this verdict question?
This page does not have the full verdict history. The dated order treats named cases differently. Ask a lawyer to check the record before applying a reported result to you. [6]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This dated record does not decide every Paragard case.
  • No personal claim acceptance, filing date or payment is established here.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

  1. DATE

    TAG

    Verdict

    WHAT HAPPENED

    Teva reported that the first Paragard MDL test trial ended on February 3, 2026, with a verdict in its favor. This result concerns one case.

    SOURCE

    sahmcapital.com

A Teva verdict report needs the original court record. The order here concerns time limits, not a jury’s decision. Ask how any reported result relates to your own case.

What should I read behind a Teva verdict report?

Ask for the actual jury result and later court orders. Document 868 deals with time defenses, not a jury decision. A lawyer can explain what the full record means for your case.

Ask for the exact case number, court, filed verdict form and judgment behind the report. A secondary headline or an existing URL is not the original finding. Have your lawyer confirm later motions or appeals before treating a reported result as the current final outcome.

What changed in the dated order, and what does it mean?

A motion ruling deals with the issue brought to the judge. A jury trial decides the questions put to the jury. Check which kind of record the report describes.

Document 868 concerns limitations and repose in specified Paragard cases. Its February 2025 conclusion grants, denies and defers different parts. It is not evidence that a jury found for Teva or that all device-warning issues were resolved.

What are the key dates behind the report?

Teva reported that the first federal test trial ended on February 3, 2026, with a verdict in its favor. As of October 6, 2026, ask a lawyer to check the judgment and any later orders for your claim.

The summary says the litigation involves alleged breakage during removal and resulting injuries. Ask which allegations the actual case presented and which questions the jury answered. Do not turn the overview into a finding of defect, safety or responsibility.

How complete is the dated log for this verdict question?

This page does not have the full verdict history. The dated order treats named cases differently. Ask a lawyer to check the record before applying a reported result to you.

Bring your case number if you already have one and identify the record you are asking about. A reported trial result, your clinician’s diagnosis and your own legal proof answer different questions. No conclusion about your case follows just from another matter’s headline.

How many cases does this record establish?

No current case count is verified here. A named-case order is not a count of all cases. Ask for the dated original count behind a total.

The February 2025 order lists groups for a particular motion. Its tables should not be turned into a current national case total. A count also does not tell you whether your claim qualifies or what any person may receive.

What facts help counsel make that comparison?

Use the actual device and removal records. Include where and when each event occurred. A form’s allegations do not prove those facts by themselves.

The official complaint separates defendants, product identity, device breakage and claimed injury. Ask the lawyer which of those details matters to the reported ruling. Do not substitute another patient’s procedure or named manufacturer for the evidence in your own file.

What should I do about a notice in my own case?

Show the complete notice to your current lawyer. Ask which action and date it requires. Do not wait on a general verdict article for a personal response.

Keep the original document with its case number and filing information. If you have prior counsel or a filed case, include that history in any request for help. A website discussion does not confirm representation or resolve your court obligations.

Follow this case

Get Paragard IUD: claims for a broken device case updates

One email when something changes: a ruling, a deadline, a settlement step. Nothing else.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Sarver: fractured copper IUD, original full case reportSarver: fractured copper IUD, original full case report · study
  5. DailyMed: Paragard prescribing informationDailyMed: Paragard prescribing information · regulator
  6. May: Paragard Doc868 time-limit orderMay: Paragard Doc868 time-limit order · court
  7. Northern District of Georgia: Paragard case summaryNorthern District of Georgia: Paragard case summary · court
  8. Teva reported that the first Paragard MDL test trial ended on February 3, 2026, with a verdict in its favor. This result concerns one case. As of October 6, 2026, ask your lawyer how it affects your claim and which later court orders apply.sahmcapital.com · Feb 3, 2026
  9. U.S. Courts: federal civil-case process
  10. Northern District of Georgia: Paragard short-form complaint

Checked against 9 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 7, 2026