Case guide

Taking out Paragard: what to ask

Difficult removal does not always mean the same complication. Ask where the device is and whether it was removed whole.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 20269 sources

This may apply to you if

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • Describe the device, removal and harm you want checked.
  • Prepare the procedure note and later care records if available.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Jordan Sarver · Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine · First author of the cited case report

Finding: The report describes one retained fragment and a treatment decision based on several individual factors; it does not establish a population breakage rate.

Sarver: fractured copper IUD, original full case report (opens in a new tab) · Jan 23, 2021 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, lead-author affiliation · Case Reports in Women's Health · 2021

Fractured copper IUD retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: a case report

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
One 38-year-old patient.
Finding:
A copper IUD broke during removal; a fragment remained in the uterine wall near the cervix. The patient later underwent surgery after consideration of several clinical factors.
Main limitation
Single case report without a comparison group or population denominator. It cannot establish a general breakage frequency, individual legal cause, or a universal need for hysterectomy. Full original report and declarations read; authors declared no funding or conflicts.

Read the source: Fractured copper IUD retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: a case report (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What should I ask before a planned removal?
Ask the care team to review your device and health. Share symptoms and past attempts. A trained clinician should remove Paragard. [5]
Why might removal be difficult?
An IUD can be stuck in the wall or break. Its place may need to be checked. A hard removal does not show which problem is present. [5]
What should be checked after the device comes out?
The clinician should check that Paragard is whole. A missing piece needs further assessment. Ask whether that finding is in the procedure note. [5]
Will a complication always require major surgery?
No one operation fits every case. Some cases need surgery. The plan should fit the findings and your health. [5]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • Having used Paragard alone does not decide a legal claim.
  • A symptom, public allegation or another patient’s treatment is not your diagnosis.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Difficult removal does not always mean the same complication. Ask where the device is and whether it was removed whole. A clinician’s findings should guide care; do not pull the threads yourself.

What should I ask before a planned removal?

Ask the care team to review your device and health. Share symptoms and past attempts. A trained clinician should remove Paragard.

Bring the placement information you have and say when it is missing. Ask what concerns would change the plan or require another appointment. Do not copy the professional forceps instructions into a home-removal plan.

Why might removal be difficult?

An IUD can be stuck in the wall or break. Its place may need to be checked. A hard removal does not show which problem is present.

Embedment means attachment into the uterine wall, while perforation can involve going through it. The label describes imaging and other clinician techniques when usual removal is unsuccessful. Ask what the examination supports rather than inferring a cause from resistance or pain.

What should be checked after the device comes out?

The clinician should check that Paragard is whole. A missing piece needs further assessment. Ask whether that finding is in the procedure note.

In the original case report, visual inspection showed a missing arm and ultrasound located a retained fragment. That patient’s course does not show how often the event occurs. A complete device, a broken thread and a retained arm are different records.

Will a complication always require major surgery?

No one operation fits every case. Some cases need surgery. The plan should fit the findings and your health.

The reported hysterectomy was selected with the patient’s bleeding, cervical history, fibroids and fragment location in mind. Ask your clinician why the proposed procedure fits your situation and what alternatives are being considered. A case report is not a care order for you.

Which concerns after a procedure need contact?

Ask for the office’s follow-up plan. Report severe pain, fever or worsening problems promptly. Claim records should not delay care.

The label describes pain and bleeding around removal and serious infection warnings. The care team should distinguish expected symptoms from signs requiring evaluation in your circumstances. Ask whom to contact and what your own discharge plan says.

How should repeated attempts be documented?

List each attempt with its date and provider. Keep the removal and later care notes together. Explain which outcome was confirmed after each visit.

The court form asks for multiple attempted removals separately. Mark whether an attempt failed, a whole device came out or a piece remained, using the actual record. A chronological account is more useful than replacing several visits with one assumed removal date. Ask a lawyer to check personal time rules while any missing records are being requested.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Sarver: fractured copper IUD, original full case reportSarver: fractured copper IUD, original full case report · study
  5. DailyMed: Paragard prescribing informationDailyMed: Paragard prescribing information · regulator
  6. May: Paragard Doc868 time-limit orderMay: Paragard Doc868 time-limit order · court
  7. Northern District of Georgia: Paragard case summaryNorthern District of Georgia: Paragard case summary · court
  8. Teva reported that the first Paragard MDL test trial ended on February 3, 2026, with a verdict in its favor. This result concerns one case. As of October 6, 2026, ask your lawyer how it affects your claim and which later court orders apply.sahmcapital.com · Feb 3, 2026
  9. Northern District of Georgia: Paragard short-form complaint

Checked against 8 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026