Who qualifies

PFAS Filing Time Limits: What to Check

Thinking about a PFAS claim? Ask a lawyer to check your own dates and law now.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202623 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Gather reports for your water source and the dates you used it.
  • Keep diagnosis, treatment and authorized care records.
  • Ask which exposure proof, legal rules and personal time limit apply.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Publisher of proposed rule guidance

Finding: The May 2026 proposal would allow eligible public water systems to request more compliance time while retaining PFOA and PFOS limits. A proposal is distinct from a final rule.

EPA proposed PFOA/PFOS compliance extension (opens in a new tab) · Jul 23, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Richard M. Gergel · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina · United States district judge signing the cited approval

Finding: The court approved the 3M public-water-system class settlement in March 2024. It explained that the release did not purport to release individuals’ personal injury claims.

Gergel 3M public water systems final approval order (opens in a new tab) · Mar 29, 2024 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Who may qualify for a deadline review?
Anyone considering a claim needs the applicable law checked. Give the lawyer the places and dates. A diagnosis or water result alone does not pick the filing rule. [14]
What does not qualify as proof of a filing extension?
A new test is not proof that a filing clock restarts. A proposed water rule is not a lawsuit extension. Ask which legal rule actually applies. [2]
What if I have a private well or a benefits question?
Those facts may point to different routes. Name the claim you want reviewed. Ask about each process rather than borrowing another program’s date. [4]
What records help a lawyer check time limits?
Write down exposure, notice and diagnosis dates. Keep the documents that support them. Label any date you do not know. [4]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A PFAS blood test cannot predict future health problems or give a treatment plan.
  • The 3M public-water-system settlement is not a personal injury payout schedule.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

The criteria attorneys check

  1. 01

    Gather reports for your water source and the dates you used it.

  2. 02

    Keep diagnosis, treatment and authorized care records.

  3. 03

    Ask which exposure proof, legal rules and personal time limit apply.

Thinking about a PFAS claim? Ask a lawyer to check your own dates and law now. A water-rule date or a water-system form is not your personal filing rule.

Who may qualify for a deadline review?

Anyone considering a claim needs the applicable law checked. Give the lawyer the places and dates. A diagnosis or water result alone does not pick the filing rule.

An injury, property issue and defined public-water-system claim are not one universal route. State law and claim type can affect the time limit. Ask counsel what must be filed, where and by when based on your facts rather than a generic national PFAS timeline.

What does not qualify as proof of a filing extension?

A new test is not proof that a filing clock restarts. A proposed water rule is not a lawsuit extension. Ask which legal rule actually applies.

EPA’s May 2026 proposal concerns eligible systems requesting more time to comply with public drinking-water limits. It does not give an individual permission to delay a lawsuit. A personal deadline needs its own legal analysis, including any claimed exception.

What if I have a private well or a benefits question?

Those facts may point to different routes. Name the claim you want reviewed. Ask about each process rather than borrowing another program’s date.

EPA does not regulate private wells, and its guidance directs owners to state agencies for testing help. The 3M class concerns defined water systems, not every well owner or household. Do not assume a utility form deadline is the filing limit for a separate injury or property matter.

What records help a lawyer check time limits?

Write down exposure, notice and diagnosis dates. Keep the documents that support them. Label any date you do not know.

Save full water notices and results with the address and sampling details. Ask covered medical providers for missing diagnosis and treatment records, subject to exceptions and copy costs. A timeline grounded in records helps the lawyer assess what happened without treating an estimated date as established.

Is there one filing deadline by state on this page?

No single PFAS cutoff applies to every claim. Ask about the actual claim and law. A court or agency’s dated notice has its own scope.

An online table cannot decide which event starts a clock or whether an exception applies in your case. Get a clear explanation of the rule and the action required. Do not assume that gathering documents, contacting a firm or waiting for a regulation itself files a lawsuit.

What happens after I ask for a deadline check?

Ask a lawyer to check the deadline even if you lack some records. Confirm who will handle the case. Read the fee and cost terms before signing.

The ABA model fee rule calls for written contingent-fee terms covering percentages and expenses; it is not a quote from your provider. Ask what costs you might owe without recovery. Keep copies of any advice or agreement and confirm the specific next filing step.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. EPA PFAS drinking-water regulationEPA PFAS drinking-water regulation · regulator
  2. EPA proposed PFOA/PFOS compliance extensionEPA proposed PFOA/PFOS compliance extension · regulator
  3. EPA proposed PFAS rescission ruleEPA proposed PFAS rescission rule · regulator
  4. EPA PFAS in private wellsEPA PFAS in private wells · regulator
  5. ATSDR PFAS information for cliniciansATSDR PFAS information for clinicians · regulator
  6. ATSDR testing for PFASATSDR testing for PFAS · regulator
  7. IARC PFOA/PFOS evaluation Q&AIARC PFOA/PFOS evaluation Q&A
  8. Shearer and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinomaShearer and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinoma · study
  9. Rhee and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinoma in Multiethnic CohortRhee and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinoma in Multiethnic Cohort · study
  10. Gergel 3M public water systems final approval orderGergel 3M public water systems final approval order · court
  11. Court-authorized 3M water-system settlement FAQCourt-authorized 3M water-system settlement FAQ · court
  12. ABA Model Rule 1.5 feesABA Model Rule 1.5 fees
  13. HHS your medical recordsHHS your medical records · regulator
  14. SDNY how long do I have to file?SDNY how long do I have to file? · court
  15. EPA Issues $3.125M Consent Decree Against WTG Gas Processingecho.epa.gov · Jun 21, 2026 · regulator
  16. Study Finds PFAS in Kidney Tissue Linked to Doubled Transplant Risk; EPA Issues $1.2M Finepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Jul 9, 2026 · study
  17. Personal-injury track status: by Case Management Order No. 35 (Aug. 15, 2025), Judge Richard M. Gergel vacated the bellwether trial set for October 20, 2025, and all related dates in CMO 26-I, citing a large number of unfiled cases, and opened a 21-day Filing Facilitation Window for personal-injury cases alleging one of the six listed injuries (kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, liver cancer and thyroid cancer). The JPML reported 15,264 actions pending in MDL 2873 on October 1, 2026; that count covers all actions in the MDL.scd.uscourts.gov · Aug 15, 2025 · court
  18. Judge Gergel (D.S.C., AFFF MDL-2873) granted final approval of 3M's public water supplier settlement: $10.3B pre-tax present value, up to $12.5B nominal, paid over 13 years starting Q3 2024, covering U.S. public water suppliers that have detected or may detect PFAS. Verified via 3M's official press release.investors.3m.com · Mar 29, 2024
  19. Chemours, DuPont and Corteva announced a $1.185B settlement fund resolving PFAS drinking-water claims of a defined class of U.S. public water systems (Chemours ~$592M, DuPont ~$400M, Corteva ~$193M), subject to D.S.C. court approval in AFFF MDL-2873; excludes state/federally owned systems and most lower Cape Fear Basin systems. Verified via DuPont's official press release. (Final court approval followed in Feb 2024 per SEC filings — approval date not independently fetched.)dupont.com · Jun 2, 2023
  20. EPA Levies $1.26M Federal Penalty Against Hasa, Inc.echo.epa.gov · Jul 4, 2026 · regulator
  21. EPA Enforcement Record Shows $541,110 Penalty Tied to AMVAC Facilityecho.epa.gov · Jul 24, 2026 · regulator
  22. EPA Issues $995,000 Penalty Against Brenntag Great Lakesecho.epa.gov · Aug 2, 2026 · regulator
  23. EPA Lists $930,000 Penalty Against Colgate-Palmoliveecho.epa.gov · Sep 10, 2026 · regulator

Checked against 19 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026