Who qualifies

PFAS in Drinking Water: Check Your Options

Worried about PFAS in your water? Start with your own supply’s test results.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202623 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Gather reports for your water source and the dates you used it.
  • Keep diagnosis, treatment and authorized care records.
  • Ask which exposure proof, legal rules and personal time limit apply.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Publisher of proposed rule guidance

Finding: The May 2026 proposal would allow eligible public water systems to request more compliance time while retaining PFOA and PFOS limits. A proposal is distinct from a final rule.

EPA proposed PFOA/PFOS compliance extension (opens in a new tab) · Jul 23, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · Publisher of PFAS clinical information

Finding: Exposure history can guide a clinical discussion. PFAS blood results do not predict future illness or supply a treatment plan.

ATSDR PFAS information for clinicians (opens in a new tab) · Jul 7, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · 2026

ATSDR summary of PFAS clinical evidence and testing limits

Design:
Agency review
Participants:
Not applicable: agency clinical evidence summary, not one enrolled patient cohort
Finding:
Certain health effects have potential PFAS associations; history and usual clinical care guide assessment.
Main limitation
Agency overview is not a new experiment or a finding about the cause of one person’s illness.

Read the source: ATSDR summary of PFAS clinical evidence and testing limits (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Who may qualify for a water-related claim check?
Ask for a review tied to your water source and dates. A town name alone is not enough. Keep any notice for the supply you used. [4]
What does not qualify as proof of illness?
A high water result is not a diagnosis. A PFAS blood test does not predict your health. Talk with your doctor about your own concerns. [5]
What if I use a private well?
EPA does not regulate private wells. Ask your state agency about tests. Before buying a filter, check which chemicals it reduces and how to maintain it. [4]
What records should I gather?
Save water tests, notices and address dates. Add health records if you have a health concern. Ask what else a reviewer needs. [4]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A PFAS blood test cannot predict future health problems or give a treatment plan.
  • The 3M public-water-system settlement is not a personal injury payout schedule.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

The criteria attorneys check

  1. 01

    Gather reports for your water source and the dates you used it.

  2. 02

    Keep diagnosis, treatment and authorized care records.

  3. 03

    Ask which exposure proof, legal rules and personal time limit apply.

Worried about PFAS in your water? Start with your own supply’s test results. A public water system and a private well have different rules and next steps.

What does not qualify as proof of illness?

A high water result is not a diagnosis. A PFAS blood test does not predict your health. Talk with your doctor about your own concerns.

ATSDR advises using exposure history and usual standards of care. A measured level can inform questions about reducing exposure, but it cannot supply a treatment plan. Keep environmental tests separate from clinical reports so neither is mistaken for the other.

What if I use a private well?

EPA does not regulate private wells. Ask your state agency about tests. Before buying a filter, check which chemicals it reduces and how to maintain it.

A state-certified lab can help with drinking-water testing using appropriate methods. Not every filter reduces PFAS, and a reduction claim does not guarantee the water meets a federal public-system limit. Keep records of testing and any filter installed, including its model and service dates.

What records should I gather?

Save water tests, notices and address dates. Add health records if you have a health concern. Ask what else a reviewer needs.

Request your provider’s own results instead of assuming one sample covers every address or year. If your medical files are missing, covered providers generally allow copies with exceptions and permitted charges. A record of gaps is more useful than a guessed exposure timeline.

Is a water-rule deadline my filing deadline?

A water-rule date is not a personal filing date. EPA’s page still describes a proposed change. Ask a lawyer which time limit applies to your claim.

The May 2026 proposal would allow eligible systems to request more compliance time for PFOA and PFOS; it is not an automatic personal lawsuit extension. It does not mean your water is contaminated or that waiting for a rule change protects a claim. Keep regulatory notices and personal legal dates distinct.

What happens after I ask for a water claim check?

Ask which route is being checked and who will handle it. Read the fee and expense terms. Keep working with your water provider and care team.

The 3M settlement concerns defined public water systems, rather than a personal payment for each household. If you seek individual legal help, ask about fees, expenses and costs if there is no recovery. Verify how health and water records will be received before sending them.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. EPA PFAS drinking-water regulationEPA PFAS drinking-water regulation · regulator
  2. EPA proposed PFOA/PFOS compliance extensionEPA proposed PFOA/PFOS compliance extension · regulator
  3. EPA proposed PFAS rescission ruleEPA proposed PFAS rescission rule · regulator
  4. EPA PFAS in private wellsEPA PFAS in private wells · regulator
  5. ATSDR PFAS information for cliniciansATSDR PFAS information for clinicians · regulator
  6. ATSDR testing for PFASATSDR testing for PFAS · regulator
  7. IARC PFOA/PFOS evaluation Q&AIARC PFOA/PFOS evaluation Q&A
  8. Shearer and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinomaShearer and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinoma · study
  9. Rhee and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinoma in Multiethnic CohortRhee and colleagues: PFAS and renal cell carcinoma in Multiethnic Cohort · study
  10. Gergel 3M public water systems final approval orderGergel 3M public water systems final approval order · court
  11. Court-authorized 3M water-system settlement FAQCourt-authorized 3M water-system settlement FAQ · court
  12. ABA Model Rule 1.5 feesABA Model Rule 1.5 fees
  13. HHS your medical recordsHHS your medical records · regulator
  14. SDNY how long do I have to file?SDNY how long do I have to file? · court
  15. EPA Issues $3.125M Consent Decree Against WTG Gas Processingecho.epa.gov · Jun 21, 2026 · regulator
  16. Study Finds PFAS in Kidney Tissue Linked to Doubled Transplant Risk; EPA Issues $1.2M Finepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Jul 9, 2026 · study
  17. Personal-injury track status: by Case Management Order No. 35 (Aug. 15, 2025), Judge Richard M. Gergel vacated the bellwether trial set for October 20, 2025, and all related dates in CMO 26-I, citing a large number of unfiled cases, and opened a 21-day Filing Facilitation Window for personal-injury cases alleging one of the six listed injuries (kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, liver cancer and thyroid cancer). The JPML reported 15,264 actions pending in MDL 2873 on October 1, 2026; that count covers all actions in the MDL.scd.uscourts.gov · Aug 15, 2025 · court
  18. Judge Gergel (D.S.C., AFFF MDL-2873) granted final approval of 3M's public water supplier settlement: $10.3B pre-tax present value, up to $12.5B nominal, paid over 13 years starting Q3 2024, covering U.S. public water suppliers that have detected or may detect PFAS. Verified via 3M's official press release.investors.3m.com · Mar 29, 2024
  19. Chemours, DuPont and Corteva announced a $1.185B settlement fund resolving PFAS drinking-water claims of a defined class of U.S. public water systems (Chemours ~$592M, DuPont ~$400M, Corteva ~$193M), subject to D.S.C. court approval in AFFF MDL-2873; excludes state/federally owned systems and most lower Cape Fear Basin systems. Verified via DuPont's official press release. (Final court approval followed in Feb 2024 per SEC filings — approval date not independently fetched.)dupont.com · Jun 2, 2023
  20. EPA Levies $1.26M Federal Penalty Against Hasa, Inc.echo.epa.gov · Jul 4, 2026 · regulator
  21. EPA Enforcement Record Shows $541,110 Penalty Tied to AMVAC Facilityecho.epa.gov · Jul 24, 2026 · regulator
  22. EPA Issues $995,000 Penalty Against Brenntag Great Lakesecho.epa.gov · Aug 2, 2026 · regulator
  23. EPA Lists $930,000 Penalty Against Colgate-Palmoliveecho.epa.gov · Sep 10, 2026 · regulator

Checked against 18 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026