Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold
The Rapidly Changing Landscape of Sexual Assault SOLs
The #MeToo movement and sustained legislative advocacy have produced a wave of state statutes extending civil limitations periods for sexual assault. Between 2017 and 2025, more than 35 states significantly extended their civil sexual assault SOLs. The direction is consistently toward longer periods — recognizing that trauma causes delayed disclosure, that institutional defendants have superior resources to litigate stale claims, and that justice for survivors should not be defeated by technicalities.
Key state deadlines as of 2026 include: California — 10 years from assault or 3 years from discovery, whichever is later (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340.16); New York — 20 years from assault for claims against individuals and institutions (CPLR § 214-j as amended); Texas — 5 years from assault (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.0045); Florida — 7 years from assault or from the date the survivor knew or should have known of the injury (Fla. Stat. § 95.11); Illinois — 20 years from date of discovery of injury; Washington — 3 years from discovery; Massachusetts — 35 years from assault for claims under its expanded SOL.
Tolling Doctrines That May Extend Your Deadline
Even in states with shorter SOLs, tolling doctrines may extend the filing window. Minority tolling suspends the SOL until the survivor turns 18 — meaning minors assaulted in rideshare vehicles have the standard adult SOL period beginning at age 18. The discovery rule starts the clock when the survivor knew or reasonably should have known that their harm was caused by another's negligence — relevant when trauma-driven repression delayed the survivor's understanding of their legal rights. Fraudulent concealment tolling may apply where Uber or Lyft actively concealed the driver's prior history or misrepresented their response to the assault report.
The critical message for every survivor is this: do not assume your time has passed without speaking to an attorney. The SOL landscape is complex, state-specific, and changing. An attorney who specializes in rideshare sexual assault can assess the exact deadline applicable to your situation and advise whether any tolling doctrines might extend your window. This analysis is provided at no cost and with complete confidentiality.
Key data
Data & Statistics
35+ states have extended civil sexual assault SOLs since 2017
RAINN State Law Database (2025)
California: 10 years from assault — one of the most generous SOLs in the nation
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340.16
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Dive deeper
Related Guides
- Uber Sexual Assault LawsuitUber faces consolidated multi-district litigation in the Northern District of California (MDL No. 3084) involving thousands of sexual assault claims from passengers. The cases allege that Uber's inadequate driver background checks, failure to remove drivers with prior complaints, and insufficient in-app safety measures enabled assaults that a more responsible platform would have prevented.
- Campus Rideshare Sexual AssaultCollege students are among the most frequent rideshare users and face elevated risk of rideshare assault, particularly during late-night bar hours. Campus assaults may involve Title IX considerations if any university nexus exists, and minor plaintiffs have extended time to file civil claims due to SOL tolling until age 18.
- SANE Exam: Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner EvidenceA sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) exam is the gold standard for documenting physical evidence of sexual assault. SANE exams are available at no cost to survivors at most hospital emergency departments and rape crisis centers, and the evidence collected can support both criminal prosecution and civil litigation — but you do not need a SANE exam to pursue a civil claim.
- PTSD and Psychiatric Injury as Compensable DamagesPost-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, and other psychiatric injuries caused by rideshare sexual assault are fully compensable as non-economic damages in civil litigation. Psychiatric injury is often the largest component of damages in assault cases — and it can be documented, quantified, and presented to juries through treating clinicians and forensic psychology experts.
- Rideshare Assault Claims Involving MinorsWhen a minor is assaulted during a rideshare trip, their parent or guardian can file a civil claim on their behalf, and the statute of limitations is tolled (suspended) until the child turns 18. This means more time is available to file, but consulting an attorney as soon as possible is still important to preserve evidence and understand the child's rights.
- Reporting Rideshare Sexual AssaultReporting a rideshare assault is entirely your decision. You are not required to report to Uber, Lyft, or law enforcement to pursue a civil claim. Understanding your reporting options — and what each pathway involves — can help you make an informed decision that feels right for you.
- Rideshare Assault MDL Status in 2026As of early 2026, both the Uber and Lyft sexual assault MDLs are in active pre-trial proceedings in the Northern District of California. Discovery is ongoing, bellwether trial selections are underway, and global settlement discussions are reported to be in progress. Joining the MDL now — while proceedings are active — provides access to the benefits of consolidated discovery and positions your case favorably for any global resolution.
- Lyft Sexual Assault LawsuitLyft faces its own multi-district litigation for sexual assault claims, consolidated separately from Uber's MDL in the Northern District of California. Lyft's smaller market share produces proportionally comparable assault allegations, with similar claims of inadequate background checks, failure to remove dangerous drivers, and insufficient passenger safety infrastructure.
- Rideshare Driver Background ChecksUber and Lyft driver background checks use name-based database searches that miss criminal records under aliases, from states with limited reporting, and from international jurisdictions. This is structurally weaker than fingerprint-based checks required of taxi drivers, school employees, and healthcare workers in most states — and that structural gap is at the center of most rideshare assault lawsuits.
- Uber Safety Report Data: What the Numbers Really MeanUber's 2022 U.S. Safety Report disclosed 3,824 sexual assault incidents across 2019 and 2020 — but this figure represents only assaults reported directly to Uber by passengers. With sexual assault reporting rates as low as 1 in 5, the true number of Uber assaults may be many times higher. The report was released only after years of litigation pressure and does not include Uber Eats delivery incidents.
- Rideshare Assault Evidence: What Records ExistRideshare companies maintain extensive digital records for every completed trip including GPS route data, timestamps, driver identity, vehicle information, and complaint histories. Through litigation discovery, your attorney can compel Uber or Lyft to produce these records, which often form critical evidence in sexual assault civil cases.
- Anonymous Filing in Rideshare Sexual Assault CasesMany survivors of rideshare sexual assault can pursue civil claims while protecting their identity through pseudonymous filing (Jane Doe or John Doe), protective orders limiting access to identifying information, and confidential settlement agreements. Protecting your privacy is a priority that experienced rideshare assault attorneys are equipped to fight for in every jurisdiction.
- Trauma-Informed Legal Process for SurvivorsPursuing a civil rideshare assault claim does not have to re-traumatize you. Attorneys who specialize in this area of law understand trauma responses, work at your pace, coordinate with your mental health providers, and advocate for procedural protections that minimize the burden on survivors throughout the legal process.
- Criminal vs. Civil Cases: How They InteractCriminal prosecution and civil litigation are entirely separate legal proceedings with different purposes, different standards of proof, and different outcomes. You can pursue a civil claim against Uber, Lyft, and the driver regardless of whether a criminal case exists, is ongoing, or resulted in acquittal. Civil claims are about compensation for your harm; criminal cases are about punishment and public accountability.
The full investigation