Case guide

Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Implant Cases: Is Yours Part of It?

The Boston Scientific case groups lawsuits over its spinal cord stimulators. See which models lawsuits name and what the court has done so far.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Does this case involve physical injury, a medical diagnosis, or significant financial loss? *

Updated Oct 5, 202636 sources

This may apply to you if

  • You have or had a Boston Scientific, Abbott or Nevro spinal cord stimulator.
  • You had a problem such as shocks, burns, a lead that moved, nerve injury or loss of pain relief.
  • You can get records that show the device and your care.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Josephine L. Staton · U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · U.S. District Judge presiding over MDL 3181

Finding: Pretrial Order No. 1 set the first scheduling conference, stayed outstanding discovery and required all parties and their counsel to preserve evidence that may be relevant until they agree on a preservation plan.

C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 1 (June 23, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Jun 23, 2026 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Publisher of the Infinion CX lead recall notice

Finding: The agency called the recall of unused Infinion CX leads the most serious type and said the action does not affect implanted devices. It shared Boston Scientific’s advice that no monitoring beyond routine follow-up is needed.

FDA recall notice: Boston Scientific Infinion CX lead (opens in a new tab) · Sep 3, 2026 · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The evidence and its limits

U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2026

Spinal Cord Stimulator Recall: Boston Scientific Removes Infinion CX Lead

Design:
Agency review
Participants:
Not a study: a recall of unused Infinion CX lead kits, with company-reported injury counts.
Finding:
Boston Scientific reported 1,081 serious injuries and no deaths linked to stress at the lead anchor site as of May 27, 2026.
Main limitation
Company-reported counts in a recall notice; they do not show how often the problem happens or what caused any one person’s injury.

Read the source: Spinal Cord Stimulator Recall: Boston Scientific Removes Infinion CX Lead (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 5, 2026

The short answer

Which Boston Scientific devices are part of the case?
The case groups lawsuits from people who say a Boston Scientific implant hurt them. The panel’s order lists no models. In the lawsuits we read, people say they had one of four models, such as the WaveWriter Alpha. [1]
How do I find out if my stimulator is a Boston Scientific device?
Check your implant card, or ask the doctor who placed it for the maker and model. Also ask for the UDI, the device’s ID code. The FDA has asked doctors to share these details. [6]
Am I part of the case if I have not filed a lawsuit?
No. The group is made up of lawsuits that people have already filed. Having a Boston Scientific device does not add you to it. A lawyer can tell you whether and where a new case could be filed. [17]
Where does the Boston Scientific case stand now?
It is still early. The two sides have not yet begun swapping evidence. The court orders we read set no trial date and announce no payments. [18]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This page cannot tell you whether your own device was faulty or caused an injury.
  • It does not list every Boston Scientific model or part number.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Which Boston Scientific devices are part of the case?

The case groups lawsuits from people who say a Boston Scientific implant hurt them. The panel’s order lists no models. In the lawsuits we read, people say they had one of four models, such as the WaveWriter Alpha.

The companies sued are Boston Scientific Corp. and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. Each person in the group says they had one of its stimulators placed and were hurt. The device makers argued that each case involved different devices and injuries. The panel did not agree and grouped the cases.

The model names come from individual lawsuits, so they are claims, not a court list. In one lawsuit, the person says they had a WaveWriter Alpha. In others, people say they had a Spectra WaveWriter, a Precision Spectra or a Precision Montage MRI. The lawsuits also name older models, such as the Precision Plus.

These lawsuits say the newer models trace back to one FDA approval. That approval, number P030017, covered the Precision system in April 2004. The lawsuits say later models came through add-on approvals, called supplements.

How do I find out if my stimulator is a Boston Scientific device?

Check your implant card, or ask the doctor who placed it for the maker and model. Also ask for the UDI, the device’s ID code. The FDA has asked doctors to share these details.

A UDI has two parts. One part names the maker and the model. The other part gives the lot or serial number of your device.

You can look up the model part in AccessGUDID, a public FDA and National Library of Medicine database. It holds device details, not facts about patients. Older implants may not be listed, so your records still matter.

Am I part of the case if I have not filed a lawsuit?

No. The group is made up of lawsuits that people have already filed. Having a Boston Scientific device does not add you to it. A lawyer can tell you whether and where a new case could be filed.

Since August 18, 2026, a new Boston Scientific case can be filed straight into the federal court in central California. Each complaint must be for one person. The company agreed that filing there counts as if the case had been filed in a proper court that day.

Cases filed in other federal courts can also join. The panel can move them in with a conditional transfer order. Its first such order in this case, on June 16, 2026, added six cases.

When the shared pretrial work ends, federal law sends each transferred case back to the court where it started, unless it has already ended.

Where does the Boston Scientific case stand now?

It is still early. The two sides have not yet begun swapping evidence. The court orders we read set no trial date and announce no payments.

Judge Josephine L. Staton runs the case in Los Angeles. In June 2026 she paused outstanding discovery and told all sides to keep evidence that may matter. In August 2026 she named lawyers to lead the people who sued.

On September 30, 2026, the parties told the court there were 59 cases and 72 people in the group. A federal panel report dated October 1 listed 41 pending cases. The two counts come from different reports, so they do not match.

The people who sued must file one main complaint by October 23, 2026. Boston Scientific can ask the judge to dismiss it by November 20, 2026. A status hearing was set for October 7, 2026.

Claims against the FDA now move on their own track. A combined complaint against the agency is also due October 23, 2026. A hearing on any request to dismiss it will be held no earlier than February 5, 2027.

Is the Infinion CX lead recall part of the case?

Not in the court papers we read. The recall pulled unused Infinion CX leads from the shelf. It does not cover leads already implanted. If you have one, ask your doctor about it.

FDA called this recall the most serious type. Boston Scientific said stress where the lead is anchored may break the lead or cause odd electrical readings. That can mean weak relief or another surgery. As of May 27, 2026, Boston Scientific had reported 1,081 serious injuries and no deaths tied to the issue.

Boston Scientific’s letter to its customers, shown in FDA’s notice, says no extra checkups are needed beyond usual follow-up visits. If you are worried about your leads, talk to your doctor before you change or turn off your device.

FDA lists other Boston Scientific stimulator recalls too. Two recent ones were a less serious type, called Class 2. In 2024, some WaveWriter Alpha units could reset while charging and briefly stop working. A software update was made available. In 2026, 43 Clik X anchors from one lot were recalled because they might not be sterile.

What does the court say about saving removed devices?

Nothing final yet. The people suing and Boston Scientific told the court that devices are being removed while the case goes on. They said they will soon start work on an order to save removed devices.

Until then, the judge’s first order tells the parties and their lawyers to keep evidence that may matter. If your surgeon plans to fix or take out any part, our page on revision and removal records explains which papers show what happened.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. JPML transfer order, MDL 3181, June 5, 2026JPML transfer order, MDL 3181, June 5, 2026 · court
  2. JPML transfer order, MDL 3194, October 2, 2026JPML transfer order, MDL 3194, October 2, 2026 · court
  3. JPML transfer order, MDL 3195, October 2, 2026JPML transfer order, MDL 3195, October 2, 2026 · court
  4. JPML pending MDL report by actions, October 1, 2026JPML pending MDL report by actions, October 1, 2026 · court
  5. JPML pending MDL report by MDL number, October 1, 2026JPML pending MDL report by MDL number, October 1, 2026 · court
  6. FDA letter to health care providers on spinal cord stimulators, 2020 (FDA archive)FDA letter to health care providers on spinal cord stimulators, 2020 (FDA archive) · regulator
  7. FDA recall notice: Boston Scientific Infinion CX leadFDA recall notice: Boston Scientific Infinion CX lead · regulator
  8. FDA: What is a medical device recall?FDA: What is a medical device recall? · regulator
  9. FDA: Premarket approval (PMA)FDA: Premarket approval (PMA) · regulator
  10. Riegel v. Medtronic, 552 U.S. 312 (2008)Riegel v. Medtronic, 552 U.S. 312 (2008) · regulator
  11. Traeger et al., Cochrane review, 2023Traeger et al., Cochrane review, 2023 · study
  12. Dhruva et al., JAMA Neurology, 2023Dhruva et al., JAMA Neurology, 2023 · study
  13. Eldabe et al., Pain Medicine, 2016Eldabe et al., Pain Medicine, 2016 · study
  14. HHS: Your medical recordsHHS: Your medical records · regulator
  15. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  16. S.D.N.Y.: How long do I have to file?S.D.N.Y.: How long do I have to file? · court
  17. C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 4: direct filing (Aug. 18, 2026)
  18. MDL 3181 joint status report (Sept. 30, 2026)
  19. Wilson v. Boston Scientific, complaint (C.D. Cal.)Wilson v. Boston Scientific, complaint (C.D. Cal.) · court
  20. Miyagi v. Boston Scientific, complaint (N.D. Ill.)Miyagi v. Boston Scientific, complaint (N.D. Ill.) · court
  21. Clark v. Boston Scientific, complaint (C.D. Cal.)Clark v. Boston Scientific, complaint (C.D. Cal.) · court
  22. Williams v. Boston Scientific, complaint (W.D. Mo.)Williams v. Boston Scientific, complaint (W.D. Mo.) · court
  23. Bozichovich v. Boston Scientific, complaint (C.D. Cal.)Bozichovich v. Boston Scientific, complaint (C.D. Cal.) · court
  24. FDA premarket approval P030017: Precision SCS systemFDA premarket approval P030017: Precision SCS system · regulator
  25. FDA: UDI basicsFDA: UDI basics · regulator
  26. NLM: About AccessGUDIDNLM: About AccessGUDID · regulator
  27. JPML: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (multidistrict litigation)JPML: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (multidistrict litigation) · court
  28. JPML Panel Rules (effective Feb. 19, 2026)JPML Panel Rules (effective Feb. 19, 2026) · court
  29. JPML conditional transfer order CTO-1, MDL 3181 (June 16, 2026)JPML conditional transfer order CTO-1, MDL 3181 (June 16, 2026) · court
  30. C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 1 (June 23, 2026)C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 1 (June 23, 2026) · court
  31. C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 2 (Aug. 13, 2026)C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 2 (Aug. 13, 2026) · court
  32. C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 3 (Aug. 18, 2026)C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 3 (Aug. 18, 2026) · court
  33. C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 5: claims against the FDA (Sept. 23, 2026)C.D. Cal., MDL 3181 Pretrial Order No. 5: claims against the FDA (Sept. 23, 2026) · court
  34. FDA recall record Z-2879-2026: Infinion CX leadsFDA recall record Z-2879-2026: Infinion CX leads · regulator
  35. FDA recall record Z-2617-2024: WaveWriter Alpha IPG kitsFDA recall record Z-2617-2024: WaveWriter Alpha IPG kits · regulator
  36. FDA recall record Z-2404-2026: Clik X anchorFDA recall record Z-2404-2026: Clik X anchor · regulator

Checked against 35 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 5, 2026