Preparing your case review…
Written By
People's Justice Legal Research Team

Ethicon, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, manufactured the most widely implanted transvaginal mesh products in the United States. Its Gynecare TVT (mid-urethral sling for SUI), Prolift (POP repair system), and Prosima devices were marketed aggressively to gynecologists and urogynecologists despite known risks of erosion, contraction, and organ perforation. Internal company documents revealed in litigation showed Ethicon knew of complication rates but continued marketing the devices without adequate warnings.

MDL 2327, the Ethicon mesh MDL before Judge Goodwin in West Virginia, became the largest single mesh MDL with over 48,000 cases at its peak. Bellwether trials produced verdicts ranging from $1.75 million to $80 million. The eventual global settlement exceeded $775 million for POP mesh claims. SUI mesh litigation under MDL 2327 continues with ongoing remands to home districts for trial.

If you were implanted with any Ethicon mesh product — including Gynecare TVT, TVT-O, TVT Secur, Abbrevo, Prolift, Prolift+M, or Prosima — and experienced complications, you may still have an active claim. Contact People's Justice for a free, confidential case evaluation.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes — in most cases. The discovery rule means the filing deadline does not start until you knew or reasonably should have known that your mesh device caused your injuries. Many women were implanted between 2008 and 2015 but only recently connected their chronic pain, erosion, or revision surgery to their mesh. Courts have consistently applied the discovery rule in mesh cases. Even if your implant was over a decade ago, you may still have an open window. Contact a mesh attorney immediately for a free case evaluation.
Case timelines vary significantly. Cases resolved through MDL global settlements were typically paid within 1–3 years of enrollment. Individual state court cases or remaining MDL remands may resolve through settlement within 12–24 months, or take 3–5 years if they proceed to trial. Given that most large MDLs have resolved, new cases today are more likely to proceed through individual litigation channels. Your attorney will provide a realistic timeline based on your specific case facts and jurisdiction.
Yes — an important distinction. Mesh used for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair placed transvaginally was ordered off the market by the FDA in 2019. Mesh used for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) — mid-urethral slings like Ethicon's TVT and TVT-O — remains on the market and is still being implanted. However, SUI mesh has its own documented complications and active litigation. Both POP mesh and SUI mesh injuries can form the basis of a lawsuit, but the regulatory and legal landscape differs somewhat between the two.
No. While the major federal MDLs were consolidated in the Southern District of West Virginia, you do not need to travel there. If your case is filed in federal court, pretrial proceedings may be coordinated, but trials occur in your home district. Many cases are also filed in state courts in the plaintiff's home state. You will likely never need to travel to West Virginia for your case.
The main defendants are Johnson & Johnson / Ethicon (Gynecare TVT, Prolift, Prosima), C.R. Bard / Becton Dickinson (Align, Avaulta, Ajust), Boston Scientific (Advantage, Obtryx, Uphold), and Endo International / AMS (MiniArc, Elevate, Perigee). Coloplast and Neomedic have also faced litigation. All have paid significant settlements. Ethicon cases historically command higher individual settlement values.
Settlement values vary widely based on injury severity. Women with mesh erosion managed without surgery have settled in the $50,000–$200,000 range. Cases requiring one revision surgery typically settle between $175,000 and $500,000. Cases involving multiple surgeries, permanent sexual dysfunction, or organ damage have settled or been awarded $400,000 to over $80 million at trial. The average payout across global MDL settlements ranged from approximately $38,750 to $62,667 per claimant depending on the defendant.
The FDA has taken its most decisive action against transvaginal mesh used for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In April 2019, the FDA ordered all manufacturers to immediately stop selling and distributing POP mesh, stating manufacturers could not demonstrate the devices were safe and effective. The FDA had previously issued major safety warnings in 2008 and 2011, noting complications were 'not rare.' Mesh used for stress urinary incontinence (mid-urethral slings) remains on the market under heightened scrutiny.
Qualifying injuries include mesh erosion or exposure (mesh poking through vaginal tissue), chronic pelvic pain lasting more than 6 months, dyspareunia (painful intercourse), mesh contraction causing vaginal shortening, urinary retention or urgency, bladder or bowel perforation by mesh, recurrent infections, and the need for revision or removal surgery. Sexual dysfunction, nerve damage, and psychological harm from these physical injuries also support claims.
An MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) is a federal court procedure that consolidates thousands of similar lawsuits before one judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. Six transvaginal mesh MDLs were consolidated before Judge Joseph Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia. Most of these MDLs resolved through global settlements. If you file today, your case may be assigned directly to federal court in your home district or handled through state court, depending on which defendant and which products are involved. An experienced mesh attorney will advise on the best filing strategy.
Yes. The cost of mesh removal or revision surgery — including surgical fees, hospital charges, anesthesia, and recovery care — is compensable as economic damages in a mesh lawsuit. Because full mesh removal is often impossible without catastrophic tissue damage, many women require multiple partial removal procedures over years. All documented medical expenses related to mesh complications and treatment are recoverable. Future medical costs, including anticipated revision surgeries, can also be claimed.
It depends on the terms of your prior settlement. Many global MDL settlements required plaintiffs to sign broad releases covering all claims against a specific defendant. However, if your prior settlement was with one defendant (e.g., AMS) and you have claims against a different manufacturer (e.g., Ethicon), you may be able to file a separate action. If your prior settlement covered only some claims or products, additional claims may remain. An attorney should review your settlement agreement before you assume your rights are exhausted.
Key evidence includes: (1) medical records documenting your mesh implantation procedure, including the device name, lot number, and manufacturer; (2) surgical reports from any revision or removal procedures; (3) imaging studies (MRI, ultrasound) showing mesh erosion or position; (4) records from your treating gynecologist, urogynecologist, or pelvic floor specialist; (5) pharmacy records for pain medications or antibiotics; (6) documentation of lost wages if employment was affected. Your attorney will help you gather these records. The device label or sticker placed in your chart at implantation is particularly valuable.
Related Topics

Related Pages

C.R. Bard, now part of Becton Dickinson, settled over 3,000 mesh cases for more than $184 million. Its Avaulta, Align, and Ajust mesh products were subjects of MDL 2187, the first major mesh MDL consolidated in West Virginia. Bard's per-case average was approximately $61,333.

Learn more

Boston Scientific settled more than 3,000 transvaginal mesh cases for over $188 million, with an average payout of approximately $62,667 — among the highest per-case averages in the mesh litigation. The company's Advantage, Obtryx, Uphold, Pinnacle, and Solyx mesh products are the primary subjects of these claims.

Learn more

There is no single filing deadline — each state has its own statute of limitations, typically 2–3 years. But the discovery rule means the clock starts when you knew or should have known mesh caused your injuries — not when you were implanted. Women implanted a decade ago may still have active claims.

Learn more

The most critical piece of evidence in a mesh lawsuit is the device identification label — a sticker placed in your surgical chart at implantation identifying the manufacturer, device name, and lot number. Combined with records of your complications and treatment, this evidence forms the foundation of your case.

Learn more

The FDA issued its first mesh safety warning in 2008, escalated to an urgent safety communication in 2011 calling complications 'not rare,' and in April 2019 ordered all manufacturers to stop selling transvaginal POP mesh — the most powerful action the FDA can take. This timeline of FDA action is central evidence in every mesh lawsuit.

Learn more

Mesh used to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP) transvaginally was ordered off the market by the FDA in April 2019 — the clearest possible regulatory confirmation that these devices were unsafe. Women implanted with POP mesh who experienced erosion, pelvic pain, revision surgery, or sexual dysfunction may qualify for significant compensation.

Learn more

You may qualify for a transvaginal mesh lawsuit if you had mesh implanted for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and experienced complications including erosion, chronic pain, revision surgery, sexual dysfunction, or organ damage. You do not need to have had a diagnosis of 'mesh erosion' — any documented complication may be sufficient.

Learn more

Full transvaginal mesh removal is rarely achievable — the mesh integrates with surrounding tissue, and attempts at complete removal risk damage to the bladder, bowel, and nerves. Most women require multiple partial removal procedures over years, each with its own risks and costs. Every mesh removal surgery is fully compensable as part of a transvaginal mesh lawsuit.

Learn more

Having one or more revision surgeries to address mesh complications significantly increases the value of a transvaginal mesh lawsuit. Each revision surgery represents documented proof of injury severity, additional medical costs, and ongoing harm. The need for revision surgery also often satisfies statute of limitations concerns through the discovery rule.

Learn more

Global MDL settlements averaged $38,750 to $62,667 per claimant depending on the defendant. Individual cases based on injury severity have settled from $50,000 to over $80 million at verdict. Factors including number of revision surgeries, permanent dysfunction, and defendant significantly affect individual case value.

Learn more

Transvaginal mesh complications include erosion through vaginal tissue, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia (painful intercourse), mesh contraction, urinary problems, and organ perforation. Many women do not connect their ongoing symptoms to their mesh implant until years later — and may still be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Learn more
Parent Case

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit

Surgical mesh implanted transvaginally to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence caused widespread injuries including erosion, chronic pelvic pain, and the need for revision surgery. Six MDLs were consolidated before Judge Joseph Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia. Major manufacturers paid over $1.9 billion in global settlements. Individual cases remain active, especially for women who recently connected their symptoms to their mesh implant.

View full case overview