Case guide

Bard pelvic mesh: identify the product and case

Bard’s pelvic repair case group appears in the court’s closed-group report. That history does not identify your implant or set a payout.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202614 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Prepare the mesh name, reason for repair and route used.
  • List symptoms, later care and the dates you know.
  • Bring any old claim or deal papers; ask a lawyer about your route.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Joseph R. Goodwin · United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · United States District Judge who entered the historical Ethicon Wave 12 order

Finding: The May 2019 order returned identified inactive cases to a working schedule after reported deals had not promptly concluded. It sets those cases’ steps, not a personal payout or current new-claim rule.

Ethicon MDL2327 Pretrial Order337, entered May1,2019 (opens in a new tab) · May 1, 2019 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What does the public court report say about Bard mesh?
The report lists Bard’s pelvic repair group, numbered 2187. It gives 2020 as the year the group ended. This is not your case result. [9]
How do I find out whether my implant was Bard?
Ask for the operation note and product information. Ask the surgeon if the chart is unclear. Do not choose a brand based on symptoms. [2]
Does the 2019 stop-sale action identify every Bard claim?
No. That action covered the remaining vaginal POP products. The record named two other makers at that point. It does not resolve a Bard patient’s claim. [1]
What care questions should I ask after an old implant?
Tell the clinician about mesh before later care. Report ongoing pain, bleeding or unusual fluid. Ask what your exam shows. [2]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • These historical records do not identify your implant or prove individual harm.
  • A court group’s status does not supply your personal payment or filing date.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Bard’s pelvic repair case group appears in the court’s closed-group report. That history does not identify your implant or set a payout. Start with the chart.

What does the public court report say about Bard mesh?

The report lists Bard’s pelvic repair group, numbered 2187. It gives 2020 as the year the group ended. This is not your case result.

The official report is for case groups ended through September 30, 2025. It lists Bard separately from other pelvic mesh manufacturers. Its rows do not tell you which product was implanted, whether a personal case settled or how much a patient received.

How do I find out whether my implant was Bard?

Ask for the operation note and product information. Ask the surgeon if the chart is unclear. Do not choose a brand based on symptoms.

FDA advises asking the provider whether mesh was used and requesting available labeling. Check whether the procedure treated prolapse, urine leakage or both. A recalled brand name from an advertisement is not a substitute for the actual surgical record.

Does the 2019 stop-sale action identify every Bard claim?

No. That action covered the remaining vaginal POP products. The record named two other makers at that point. It does not resolve a Bard patient’s claim.

FDA’s April 2019 entry identifies Boston Scientific and Coloplast applications for the remaining products. The agency distinguishes vaginal POP mesh, abdominal repairs and urinary slings. Match the correct indication and route before applying an action to an older Bard implant.

What care questions should I ask after an old implant?

Tell the clinician about mesh before later care. Report ongoing pain, bleeding or unusual fluid. Ask what your exam shows.

FDA’s patient pages recommend routine follow-up if you are well and satisfied. When symptoms occur, discuss individual care options. These general pages do not provide a Bard-specific diagnosis or a rule that everyone should have mesh removed.

Does a Bard settlement figure establish my payment?

A company figure does not tell you your share. Ask for the actual offer and agreement. The terminated report is not a payment grid.

A case count and a total for agreed payments may measure different things and cannot simply be divided into a personal promise. Request the fee and expense agreement too. No Bard payout average or current firm acceptance rule has been established from the records cited here.

Which Bard papers should I take to a lawyer?

Bring product and procedure records. Include any filed-case notice, offer or prior lawyer. Ask which court and time rule apply.

Keep brand identity, medical findings and legal status as separate questions. The Ethicon order illustrates case-specific preparation; it does not govern every Bard claimant. Ask your lawyer to check the actual Bard case record rather than using the group’s closure year for your deadline.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. FDA mesh activities: POP stop-sale and later reviewsFDA mesh activities: POP stop-sale and later reviews · regulator
  2. FDA patient information: pelvic organ prolapseFDA patient information: pelvic organ prolapse · regulator
  3. FDA patient information: stress urinary incontinenceFDA patient information: stress urinary incontinence · regulator
  4. FDA guidance: vaginal versus abdominal prolapse meshFDA guidance: vaginal versus abdominal prolapse mesh · regulator
  5. FDA review: mini-slings for stress urinary incontinenceFDA review: mini-slings for stress urinary incontinence · regulator
  6. PROSPECT original four- and six-year randomized follow-upPROSPECT original four- and six-year randomized follow-up · study
  7. Ethicon MDL2327 Pretrial Order337, entered May1,2019Ethicon MDL2327 Pretrial Order337, entered May1,2019 · court
  8. Southern District of West Virginia: Ethicon MDL2327 public archiveSouthern District of West Virginia: Ethicon MDL2327 public archive · court
  9. JPML cumulative terminated litigations through September30,2025JPML cumulative terminated litigations through September30,2025 · court
  10. New Jersey courts: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare dated orders indexNew Jersey courts: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare dated orders index · court
  11. ABA Model Rule1.5: feesABA Model Rule1.5: fees
  12. HHS individual access to health informationHHS individual access to health information · regulator
  13. SDNY: how long to file a complaintSDNY: how long to file a complaint · court
  14. US Courts: civil casesUS Courts: civil cases · court

Checked against 14 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026