Who qualifies
A purchase dispute and a gaming-injury claim need different proof. Ask which issue is being checked before treating a refund as damages.
Updated Oct 4, 20269 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 20269 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
World Health Organization · Publisher of clinical classification guidance
Finding: WHO describes gaming disorder as loss of control, games taking over daily life, and continued play despite harm. Its October 22, 2020 guidance says diagnosis also requires serious harm to daily functioning.
WHO questions and answers on gaming disorder (opens in a new tab) · Oct 22, 2020 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Karen K. Caldwell · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Chair of the Panel listed in this order
Finding: The Panel’s December 10, 2025 order refused to group the gateway-game claims in one federal court. The order concerns case grouping, not a finding that a game caused a child’s harm.
Gateway-game order denying transfer (opens in a new tab) · Dec 10, 2025 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
World Health Organization · 2020
Read the source: WHO guidance on gaming disorder (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Not covered by this case
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
A claim needs the purchase and law checked. FTC’s Fortnite page describes one unwanted-purchase program. It is not a rule for every game or new claimant.
Identify the transaction, account and concern before asking about a remedy. Explain whether the question is a charge you did not want, a product description or alleged health harm. Do not assume those questions share one deadline or claim process.
The FTC staff report describes randomly assigned virtual items. It does not find every product illegal. The product and law need their own check.
Keep the offer description and receipt if you have them. Ask whether the reward was random, known in advance or earned without a separate charge. Do not apply a headline about another country’s law without checking the actual jurisdiction.
WHO’s care guide is separate from FTC’s refund program. Neither proves a company caused harm to your child. Ask a provider and lawyer to address their own questions.
Organize purchase records and care concerns separately. Ask before sharing health records for a billing dispute. This page does not supply a treatment recommendation, diagnosis or game-specific acceptance rule.
Start with receipts, the offer and any dispute response. A civil claim explains harm and what the person seeks. Ask which facts are needed for your question.
Ask the lawyer to distinguish the purchase design from the legal basis for a claim. Keep transaction records and care concerns separate. Ask what further facts are needed before choosing a proposed next step.
List purchases and claimed harm apart. Ask which claim and time rule fit; a refund does not cover every loss.
Ask if the lawyer would check spending, health harm or another claim. Read the work and costs before treating these as one case.
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Ask a law firm to review your caseLoot boxes have not yet been definitively classified as gambling under U.S. federal law, but the legal landscape is evolving rapidly. The core legal question is whether loot box rewards constitute “prizes” under state gambling statutes. Belgium has already banned loot boxes as gambling, the Netherlands fined EA €10 million for FIFA loot boxes, and the British Columbia Supreme Court certified a class action finding that loot-box-as-gambling claims raise triable issues. In the U.S., multiple states have introduced legislation to regulate or ban loot boxes in games marketed to children. The Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act at the federal level would prohibit loot boxes and pay-to-win mechanics. Research showing that loot box spending is correlated with problem gambling in adolescents strengthens the case for legal classification.
Not from the WHO source alone. It defines gaming disorder as a health condition and does not address loot box disclosure rules. Check the game records and the law that applies before drawing a legal conclusion.
Source: WHO: Gaming disorder · as of Oct 7, 2026
Not from the WHO source alone. It defines gaming disorder as a health condition and does not decide legal eligibility, refunds, or deadlines. A lawyer can compare purchases, consent facts, and state law.
Source: WHO: Gaming disorder · as of Oct 7, 2026
Mobile games like Raid: Shadow Legends and numerous others also employ aggressive gacha and loot box systems. The common thread is the use of variable-ratio reinforcement with low odds and high psychological impact.
Checked against 9 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026