State litigation guide · New Hampshire

Hernia Mesh (Davol/C.R. Bard) Lawsuit in New Hampshire

Time limits apply in New Hampshire. Find out if you still qualify.

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated June 11, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Statute of limitations — New Hampshire

RSA 508:4 provides a 3-year limitations period for personal injury actions in New Hampshire, including product liability claims. The discovery rule applies, tolling the period until the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should discover the mesh-related injury and causation. No statute of repose applies to New Hampshire product liability claims. Many New Hampshire claimants receive specialized mesh revision care at Boston hospitals and file in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire before transfer to MDL 2846.

3 years from discovery of mesh-related injury and causation

New Hampshire data

Exposure in New Hampshire

Estimated annual hernia repair surgeries in New Hampshire, with Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Catholic Medical Center among the highest-volume providers

~5,100

Source: New Hampshire Hospital Association surgical utilization data

New Hampshire claimants benefit from proximity to Boston's world-class hernia revision surgery centers at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston access

Source: Geographic proximity analysis

Medical resources

Clinics & Specialists in New Hampshire

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center — Section of General Surgery

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Hernia mesh litigation is a mass tort action against manufacturers of defective synthetic mesh implants used in hernia repair surgery. The primary defendants are Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard (now part of Becton Dickinson), Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson), Atrium Medical, and Covidien (now part of Medtronic). These companies manufactured polypropylene and composite mesh devices that have been associated with serious complications including mesh migration, adhesion, infection, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction. Thousands of patients have filed claims in MDL 2846 in the Southern District of Ohio and in state court coordinations.

Keep reading