State litigation guide · Nevada

Hernia Mesh (Davol/C.R. Bard) Lawsuit in Nevada

Time limits apply in Nevada. Find out if you still qualify.

Free Case Review

Check your eligibility — free

Answer 2-3 quick questions to review your potential case.

People's Justice Research TeamUpdated June 11, 2026Fact-checked

Verified against court and regulatory records · No upfront fees · Your information is never sold

Statute of limitations — Nevada

NRS § 11.190(3) provides a 3-year limitations period for product liability personal injury actions in Nevada. The discovery rule applies — for hernia mesh claimants, the period runs from when the plaintiff knew or should have known their complications were mesh-related. No statute of repose applies to Nevada product liability claims. Nevada's concentrated population in Clark County (Las Vegas) and Washoe County (Reno) means most mesh cases originate in those districts before transfer to MDL 2846 in S.D. Ohio.

3 years from discovery of mesh-related injury and causation

Nevada data

Exposure in Nevada

Estimated annual hernia repair surgeries in Nevada, driven by Las Vegas's large population and hospitality workforce with elevated manual labor hernia risk

~18,000

Source: Nevada Hospital Association surgical utilization data

Estimated hernia mesh settlement range for Nevada claimants based on MDL 2846 comparable cases and Clark County economic baselines

$130,000–$200,000

Source: MDL 2846 plaintiff registry and Nevada venue analysis

Medical resources

Clinics & Specialists in Nevada

University Medical Center of Southern Nevada — Trauma & Surgical Services

Renown Regional Medical Center — Surgical Specialties, Reno

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

12 QUESTIONS

Hernia mesh litigation is a mass tort action against manufacturers of defective synthetic mesh implants used in hernia repair surgery. The primary defendants are Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard (now part of Becton Dickinson), Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson), Atrium Medical, and Covidien (now part of Medtronic). These companies manufactured polypropylene and composite mesh devices that have been associated with serious complications including mesh migration, adhesion, infection, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction. Thousands of patients have filed claims in MDL 2846 in the Southern District of Ohio and in state court coordinations.

Keep reading