Case guide

CPAP Claims and Money: Gross, Net and Proof Questions

Ask what the claim seeks and what any offer covers. Check fees, costs and proof terms one by one.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202611 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Identify the actual Philips model and your dates of use.
  • Bring the diagnosis and treatment records for an individual legal check.
  • Tell the lawyer about any replacement, earlier registration or agreement.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Grégoire Justeau · Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Angers University Hospital, France · First-listed author of the original CPAP cancer cohort

Finding: The 4,447-person cohort found no increased overall cancer incidence among Philips users compared with other brands. Its observational design and follow-up cannot exclude every risk or decide an individual cause.

Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022 (opens in a new tab) · Jul 14, 2022 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Joy Flowers Conti · United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania · Senior United States District Judge

Finding: The January 16, 2026 opinion grants remand of the Graham case to Kentucky state court. It records past settlements and a January 31, 2025 private injury-settlement registration date; it does not decide personal medical cause or injury compensation.

Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · Jan 16, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort Study Group; Angers University Hospital, France · European Respiratory Journal · 2022

Cancer risk in adherent users of polyurethane foam-containing CPAP devices for sleep apnoea

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
4,447 patients, including 1,648 Philips and 2,799 other-device users
Finding:
No association with increased overall cancer incidence was found over a median 7.2-year follow-up.
Main limitation
Observational design, possible unmeasured factors and limited ability to detect certain cancers. Two authors disclosed Philips lecture honoraria outside the study. This does not establish individual cause or all-model safety.

Read the source: Cancer risk in adherent users of polyurethane foam-containing CPAP devices for sleep apnoea (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What does a civil claim ask the court to do?
It seeks relief for alleged harm and responsibility. Asking for money is not the same as being awarded or paid it. [2]
What does a recalled device establish about my claim?
It identifies a device-safety question, not a payment. The actual harm and parties still need review. [6]
How does a named settlement change the questions?
Ask for that agreement’s conditions, offer and release. Do not assume all CPAP programs cover the same loss. [9]
How should I compare gross and net amounts?
Ask what the offer is before deductions and what you keep after them. Read the actual legal fees and case-cost terms. [5]

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Ask what the claim seeks and what any offer covers. Check fees, costs and proof terms one by one. This page does not estimate what you could get.

What does a civil claim ask the court to do?

It seeks relief for alleged harm and responsibility. Asking for money is not the same as being awarded or paid it.

The federal court guide describes complaints stating the harm, why a defendant is responsible and the relief sought. Keep the actual claim and requested relief distinct from a concluded agreement. This page does not estimate damages for pain, bills or work loss without the governing law, proof and personal facts.

What does a recalled device establish about my claim?

It identifies a device-safety question, not a payment. The actual harm and parties still need review.

FDA’s recall guidance describes potential foam risks in certain Philips machines. The French observational cohort found no higher overall cancer rate for Philips users, with design and follow-up limits and disclosed outside-study lecture fees for two authors. Neither source fixes personal legal responsibility or a recovery because someone used a recalled model.

How does a named settlement change the questions?

Ask for that agreement’s conditions, offer and release. Do not assume all CPAP programs cover the same loss.

The January 2026 Graham ruling distinguishes a private injury deal from group deals for financial loss and health monitoring. That old account is not an offer to every user. Ask which program and proof terms fit. Check what prior deals mean and whether a sum describes a total fund or your own claim.

How should I compare gross and net amounts?

Ask what the offer is before deductions and what you keep after them. Read the actual legal fees and case-cost terms.

The ABA model rule describes a written recovery-based fee agreement, expense deductions and possible losing-case expenses. That model does not certify every state or this firm’s terms. Ask the lawyer to explain each charge, excluded work and any other deduction in the proposed offer rather than assuming a headline number is the amount you receive.

Which records make the review more useful?

Keep device, health, billing and prior claim papers with dates. Ask which gaps matter to proof and timing.

HHS guidance describes covered medical and billing-record access, with exceptions and possible copying charges. Ask who may request or receive missing copies. Bring the actual model and use history and seek a personal filing-limit check; a general program date or another claimant’s paperwork does not calculate your deadline.

What happens after I ask about a claim or offer?

Ask who will assess it and explain the next step. Confirm representation and written terms before relying on an intake.

A review request is not a court complaint or a payment decision. Ask about the actual firm’s work, fees, expenses and record permissions, and keep the replies. No claim discussion here certifies acceptance, a current program payment, medical cause or an outcome for your family.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. HHS: Your Medical RecordsHHS: Your Medical Records · regulator
  2. Federal courts: civil casesFederal courts: civil cases · court
  3. ABA: fees paid from a successful claimABA: fees paid from a successful claim
  4. SDNY: filing time limitsSDNY: filing time limits · court
  5. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  6. FDA recalled Philips device patient guidanceFDA recalled Philips device patient guidance · regulator
  7. FDA foam testing summaryFDA foam testing summary · regulator
  8. Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022 · study
  9. Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026 · court
  10. Philips announced (Apr 29, 2024) a $1.1 billion total resolution of US Respironics personal-injury and medical-monitoring litigation; the official court settlement site confirms $1.075 billion for personal-injury claims in MDL 3014 and Massachusetts state court (~58,000 registrants; injuries diagnosed by Apr 29, 2024 qualify). A January 16, 2026 court opinion says payments were anticipated in early 2026; no admission of liability.respironicspisettlement.com · Apr 29, 2024
  11. Philips announced resolution of the US economic-loss class litigation in MDL 3014 (Sept 7, 2023 press release): predefined cash awards by device type, extended warranties, and a return bonus; Philips' release cites a EUR 575 million Q1 2023 provision and explicitly excludes personal injury and medical monitoring claims. The commonly cited $479 million settlement figure is from secondary press coverage (Drugwatch), not Philips' own release — flagged accordingly.usa.philips.com · Sep 7, 2023

Checked against 9 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026