Case guide
Keep device, health and prior claim records with their dates. Ask which missing proof matters; records alone do not decide cause, acceptance or payment.
Updated Oct 4, 202611 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 202611 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
Grégoire Justeau · Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Angers University Hospital, France · First-listed author of the original CPAP cancer cohort
Finding: The 4,447-person cohort found no increased overall cancer incidence among Philips users compared with other brands. Its observational design and follow-up cannot exclude every risk or decide an individual cause.
Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022 (opens in a new tab) · Jul 14, 2022 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Joy Flowers Conti · United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania · Senior United States District Judge
Finding: The January 16, 2026 opinion grants remand of the Graham case to Kentucky state court. It records past settlements and a January 31, 2025 private injury-settlement registration date; it does not decide personal medical cause or injury compensation.
Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · Jan 16, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort Study Group; Angers University Hospital, France · European Respiratory Journal · 2022
Read the source: Cancer risk in adherent users of polyurethane foam-containing CPAP devices for sleep apnoea (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
Keep the model and serial number and old device records. Save use dates, notices and later machine records.
FDA directs people to the serial number and recall information and notes that suppliers can help identify a recalled device. Put each document with its source and date. Mark gaps rather than guessing that a family name or a purchase period proves recall status for every machine.
Keep the actual diagnosis, care notes and bills. Ask providers for missing covered copies and access terms.
HHS guidance describes access to medical and billing records with exceptions, such as separate psychotherapy notes, and possible copying charges. Ask what authorization someone helping you needs. A record file establishes what was documented; it does not let this page diagnose illness or prove the device caused it.
Talk to the provider about the actual device and symptoms. Do not remove foam or add a CPAP or BiPAP filter to create proof.
FDA warns that those changes may affect function or exposure and advises against ozone or UV cleaning. Discuss the care plan before changing use; stopping can be riskier for some patients. Keep existing photos or notices with their dates instead of using a claim checklist as repair instructions.
FDA describes potential risks, and a French study found no higher overall cancer rate. Neither decides one person’s cause.
The 4,447-person observational cohort compared Philips and other users over a median 7.2 years. Its design may miss certain risks, and two authors disclosed outside-study Philips lecture fees. Give clinicians and counsel the actual health and product records so the review can consider both findings and limits rather than treating a warning as a verdict.
Keep earlier claims, releases and registration papers. Ask what law and filing dates need review.
The January 2026 Graham opinion discusses a past private injury program with its own registration date and terms. Those facts do not create one deadline or acceptance rule for every user. Tell the lawyer what was signed, which records are missing and which diagnosis or use dates need prompt checking.
Ask who will review the file and what action comes next. Confirm written fees and case-cost terms before agreeing.
Ask who may receive the records, what work the agreement covers and how expenses are handled if there is no recovery. Keep a copy of requests and replies. Asking for a review here is not filing court papers, acceptance by a firm or certification that the assembled file meets a program’s proof rules.
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Register your interestChecked against 9 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026