Injury guide
A doctor must diagnose cancer behind the nose. Keep care and device records, and ask what a claim needs without assuming the device caused it.
Updated Oct 4, 202612 sources
See If You Qualify
Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes
Updated Oct 4, 202612 sources
This may apply to you if
These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.
Grégoire Justeau · Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Angers University Hospital, France · First-listed author of the original CPAP cancer cohort
Finding: The 4,447-person cohort found no increased overall cancer incidence among Philips users compared with other brands. Its observational design and follow-up cannot exclude every risk or decide an individual cause.
Justeau original CPAP cancer cohort, 2022 (opens in a new tab) · Jul 14, 2022 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Joy Flowers Conti · United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania · Senior United States District Judge
Finding: The January 16, 2026 opinion grants remand of the Graham case to Kentucky state court. It records past settlements and a January 31, 2025 private injury-settlement registration date; it does not decide personal medical cause or injury compensation.
Graham court opinion, January 16, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · Jan 16, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort Study Group; Angers University Hospital, France · European Respiratory Journal · 2022
Read the source: Cancer risk in adherent users of polyurethane foam-containing CPAP devices for sleep apnoea (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
Food and Drug Administration · 2024
Read the source: FDA review of Philips foam testing; not a patient outcome study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026
The process
You answer a few questions
About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.
A lawyer looks at it
A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.
The firm decides and gets in touch
If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.
It is cancer in tissue behind the nose, in the upper throat. The diagnosis needs a doctor’s assessment.
NCI calls this area the nasopharynx. Its patient guide describes a head-and-neck cancer, not a finding that CPAP caused the disease. Ask for the exact diagnosis and site in writing. Keep device notes separate so a general recall does not replace the clinical explanation of what was found.
A neck lump, hearing changes or nosebleeds need a check. They can have causes other than this cancer.
NCI also describes ear pain, a sore throat and a stuffy nose among possible signs. Tell the clinician when symptoms began and about device use. Do not diagnose cancer from a recall notice or wait for a legal decision before asking about the symptoms.
Doctors may use an exam, a scope, scans and tissue tests. The care plan depends on the cancer, your health and preferences.
A biopsy removes cells or tissue for cancer checks under a microscope. NCI describes care options such as radiation and drugs, with plans led by a team familiar with this cancer. Ask what the findings mean and what alternatives fit; this page does not choose a regimen or predict a cure.
The study compared Philips and other device users. It found no higher overall cancer rate for Philips users. It cannot decide every risk or one person’s cause.
The study followed 4,447 patients, with 1,648 Philips users and 2,799 other-device users. It was not a trial that assigned devices. Its design and follow-up may miss certain risks; two authors disclosed Philips lecture fees outside the study. FDA’s separate foam guidance still describes potential risks rather than diagnosing your cancer.
Ask a lawyer to check the diagnosis, actual device and law. A diagnosis alone does not mean a firm or program will take the claim.
A civil case reviews harm and responsibility. Ask which product records and dates matter and disclose any earlier claim or release. The court’s historical private injury-program discussion is not a universal rule for every cancer patient; get the actual agreement if that program is part of the review.
Keep health, model and serial records. Talk to the provider before changing device use or treatment.
FDA says some patients face more risk from stopping a recalled device than continuing it. For CPAP or BiPAP, do not add a filter, remove foam or use ozone or UV cleaners. Ask about covered health-record copies and written legal fees and expenses, without treating record gathering as representation.
The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.
Register your interestChecked against 10 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated
How we make moneyPeople's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026