Settlement guide

IVC filter claims: what do payment records show?

The April 2021 Bard order mentions settled cases. Its opening case-status section does not give a personal payout grid.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 20269 sources

This may apply to you if

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • For a check, gather the filter brand/model and implant date if known.
  • Describe the harm and later care in your own words.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

David G. Campbell · United States District Court for the District of Arizona · United States district judge signing the cited order

Finding: TheApril 26, 2021 Bard order ended centralized proceedings and contemplated further litigation in other courts for specified cases. It did not terminate every manufacturer's individual claim.

Campbell: Bard amended final remand/transfer orderDoc22042 (opens in a new tab) · Apr 26, 2021 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

54 United States study sites; first-author affiliation Indiana University · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · 2023

PRESERVE: Outcomes at 12 months

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
1429 consenting participants; 1421 received filters.
Finding:
Prespecified safety and effectiveness goals were met, with adverse events also recorded, including a death during attempted retrieval.
Main limitation
Prospective nonrandomized study, varied follow-up and many removed filters; no randomized untreated comparison or lifetime model-specific risk estimate. Original author abstract read; full paper and funding/conflicts not reviewed.

Read the source: PRESERVE: Outcomes at 12 months (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Has an IVC filter settlement been announced in these records?
The Bard order describes some settled cases. Its opening status section has no payment plan for all filter patients or makers. [7]
What amounts does the cited order announce?
No one has announced a personal payout grid in the opening case-status section reviewed here. It does not give an estimate for your claim. [7]
What affects how much a person might receive?
Ask a lawyer how the actual harm, proof and legal issues affect any offer. A device name or symptom alone does not set a payment. [7]
What fees and expenses could come off a payment?
Get the fee and expense terms in writing. The model rule is not this provider’s agreement. It does not promise that contact is free. [1]

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

The April 2021 Bard order mentions settled cases. Its opening case-status section does not give a personal payout grid. Ask what applies to your device before using an online range.

Has an IVC filter settlement been announced in these records?

The Bard order describes some settled cases. Its opening status section has no payment plan for all filter patients or makers.

The order also says other cases were dismissed or would be sent to other courts. Different outcomes are not proof that your claim has settled. Confirm any actual agreement and who it binds.

What amounts does the cited order announce?

No one has announced a personal payout grid in the opening case-status section reviewed here. It does not give an estimate for your claim.

A report that some cases settled does not show what every person receives. Ask for the actual agreement or official payment terms that apply to your case. An online average cannot replace that record.

What affects how much a person might receive?

Ask a lawyer how the actual harm, proof and legal issues affect any offer. A device name or symptom alone does not set a payment.

A prospective filter study reported both benefits and adverse events. It was not a damages table or proof of personal causation. Keep your own diagnoses, procedure findings and losses distinct from its group results.

What fees and expenses could come off a payment?

Get the fee and expense terms in writing. The model rule is not this provider’s agreement. It does not promise that contact is free.

Ask about percentages, expense deductions and whether costs could be owed after a loss. Ask which other deductions need review under the actual agreement and law. Do not infer a take-home amount from a gross headline.

When could money arrive?

The cited order does not set a payment date for every patient. Ask which filed case, offer or agreement supplies the relevant timing.

A filter-removal decision is separate from payment administration. FDA guidance is clinical, not a financial schedule. Do not arrange retrieval on the assumption that it creates a payment right or faster award.

Should I trust online ranges when I check a claim?

Ask for a primary source and its scope before using a number. Prepare your care records and ask for a personal law and deadline review.

Request missing covered records through the provider, with exceptions noted. Ask the lawyer to compare any stated payment rule with your actual device and agreement. A legal contact request is not proof that a settlement includes you.

What happens when I check a claim?

Ask who will review the device, care records and legal facts. Ask what is missing and read the terms before sharing reports or hiring a firm.

Bring any actual offer, agreement or case notice for the lawyer to assess. Ask whether a stated program includes your device and claim, rather than assuming that a past settlement covers you.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Johnson: PRESERVE12-month outcomes, original author abstractJohnson: PRESERVE12-month outcomes, original author abstract · study
  5. FDA: authorization of laser filter-removal deviceFDA: authorization of laser filter-removal device · regulator
  6. FDA: Option ELITE recallZ-0589-2026FDA: Option ELITE recallZ-0589-2026 · regulator
  7. Campbell: Bard amended final remand/transfer orderDoc22042Campbell: Bard amended final remand/transfer orderDoc22042 · court
  8. JPML: Cook filter transfer orderJPML: Cook filter transfer order · court
  9. Johnson et al.: original PRESERVE abstract and metadataJohnson et al.: original PRESERVE abstract and metadata · study

Checked against 9 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026