Case guide

Abuse in a bishop interview: records to keep

Note the meeting, dates and reports you recall. A Church role alone does not decide fault, privacy or your time to file.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202610 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Ask a lawyer about sexual abuse by a person linked to the LDS Church.
  • Explain the place, years and your age when the abuse happened.
  • Describe the person’s role and any reports or responses you remember.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Karen K. Caldwell · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Chair of the panel issuing the April 3, 2025 order

Finding: The panel denied the request to group the listed LDS abuse cases. It said individual reports of abuse and the responses to those reports would be important facts in each case.

Order Denying Transfer, LDS sexual abuse litigation, April 3, 2025 (opens in a new tab) · Apr 3, 2025 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2025

What the LDS grouping order reviewed

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
Listed civil actions and their varied allegations; no enrolled patients.
Finding:
The panel refused the listed grouping request and said individual reports and responses would matter.
Main limitation
A court coordination review does not establish abuse, fault, a clinical diagnosis or current case status.

Read the source: What the LDS grouping order reviewed (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What should I note about the interview?
Start with the place, date and role you remember. Mark what is uncertain. A civil claim needs its own account of harm and responsibility. [8]
Does a bishop’s role decide the legal claim?
The LDS order describes varied roles and relationships. It does not find every Church leader liable. Ask how the person’s role affects the claim you want checked. [1]
How should I record a later report?
List whom you told and the response you recall. The panel said those facts would differ across cases. Keep an existing reply without adding words you do not remember. [1]
What should I ask before sharing details?
Ask who will receive your account and what must be reported. RAINN’s support guidance has privacy exceptions. Its terms do not promise this site keeps every detail private. [5]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A policy, role or published allegation does not prove your claim.
  • No personal deadline, firm acceptance, payment or privacy guarantee is given.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

What should I note about the interview?

Start with the place, date and role you remember. Mark what is uncertain. A civil claim needs its own account of harm and responsibility.

Use the title the person used at the time, rather than guessing a legal job title. Note whether someone arranged the meeting or was nearby. Keep any invitation or message that helps explain the setting.

How should I record a later report?

List whom you told and the response you recall. The panel said those facts would differ across cases. Keep an existing reply without adding words you do not remember.

A short factual note is enough to begin a discussion. Ask whether the lawyer needs a fuller statement later and how to give it safely. There is no reason to send graphic material to test an online form.

What should I ask before sharing details?

Ask who will receive your account and what must be reported. RAINN’s support guidance has privacy exceptions. Its terms do not promise this site keeps every detail private.

Use a safe contact method and tell the recipient how you can be reached. Ask whether messages, mail or callbacks might be visible to someone unsafe. Request an explanation before agreeing to share a full file.

How should I hand off interview notes?

Give the lawyer the place, role and dates you know. Ask which gaps matter before trying to fill them yourself.

Scientific evidence for this case

LDS Church Abuse · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · 2023Cross-sectional

Institutional Betrayal and Clergy Sexual Abuse: Impact on Disclosure, Reporting, and Psychological Outcomes

Survivors who experienced institutional betrayal (e.g., Church concealment of abuse, victim-blaming by leaders) had PTSD symptom severity scores 2.3x higher than survivors who did not experience institutional betrayal

LDS Church Abuse · Journal of Trauma and Dissociation · 2022Cross-sectional

Religious Institutional Abuse: Long-Term Psychological Outcomes in Adult Survivors

Clergy abuse survivors showed elevated complex PTSD rates (78%) compared to other sexual abuse survivors (45%)

LDS Church Abuse · Child Abuse & Neglect · 2018Cross-sectional

Mandated Reporter Compliance in Religious Institutions: A National Survey

41% of surveyed religious leaders were unaware of their mandatory reporting obligations in their state

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest